The best way of sending comms is with an event actually in motion- so yes, the storm is actually happening (this is important for a comm to look natural). The numbers look like they could be important in this case, but all is subjective. I take your point, but I saw several matching details and put a thought out. No need to be aggravated by it, nor 'fake news' it. Have you read this site on comms?
I just follow this lead to be fair, I'm still learning. I'm always happy to be shown to be wrong by constructive criticism on the content of the decode.
The best way of sending comms is with an event actually in motion- so yes, the storm is actually happening (this is important for a comm to look natural). The numbers look like they could be important in this case, but all is subjective. I take your point, but I saw several matching details and put a thought out. No need to be aggravated by it, nor 'fake news' it. Have you read this site on comms?
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/blog/
I just follow this lead to be fair, I'm still learning. I'm always happy to be shown to be wrong by constructive criticism on the content of the decode.
Just my opinion. Don't take it as gospel. I don't bekeive every little thing that happens is comes as some do.