Now I get it. The CIA directs and funds hollywood and that's how they orchestrated this whole scheme where they got the victim her job on set. Alec Baldwin was just the pansy this time. CIA used its agent to hand alec Baldwin the deadly pistol to take out the director. Now I get it. ... It's not Alec Baldwin's fault. He was tricked.
She was the camera operator, if he was pointing the gun at the camera then it would make sense that she would be hit. It would also make sense for the director to be hit if the bullet passed through her and hit him as the directors are often standing next to the camera operators watching how the scene is coming across on camera on an external monitor
Now I get it. The CIA directs and funds hollywood and that's how they orchestrated this whole scheme where they got the victim her job on set. Alec Baldwin was just the pansy this time. CIA used its agent to hand alec Baldwin the deadly pistol to take out the director. Now I get it. ... It's not Alec Baldwin's fault. He was tricked.
I agree with that possibility. This is a neutral question: Why would he point the gun at Halya?
She was the camera operator, if he was pointing the gun at the camera then it would make sense that she would be hit. It would also make sense for the director to be hit if the bullet passed through her and hit him as the directors are often standing next to the camera operators watching how the scene is coming across on camera on an external monitor
That's plausible. It would be great to know if they were filming or rehearsing a scene like that.
Somebody else mentioned that cameras downsight of a gun are unmanned by convention. I guess this wouldn't be the case in your suggestion