Anon gazes into the Red October abyss, which gazes back at Anon…🧐
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (41)
sorted by:
That’s a bunch of coincidences!🧐
FWIW they interviewed a prop master on Fox that says they will sometimes have the actors shoot real bullets out of the gun (if an actual working gun) in a safe environment so the actors will be able to 'act the recoil' from shooting a projectile vs a blank. As in arm goes back down etc since opposite force vs just a noise maker. Of course those are locked away immediately and kept off site usually.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yk7K8-HnfI
Pretty Cool seeing Keanu and those guys use real ammo to learn tech / arms / acting about firing real rounds. Had just read about this and damn impressive his real skills.
I understand Brandon Lee, son of Bruce Lee, died on the set in the exact same way.
I ask myself --- "Who benefits from this tragedy?" So far the tragedy has flooded the blogosphere for 3 days now. One should wonder about this and ask -- 'Is this a big distraction?' And if so, 'From what?'
We cannot ignore this as possibly being a purposeful distraction, but from what?
If necessary, we know the Cabal will sacrifice one of their own 'flunkies' to preserve whatever they are trying to keep hidden. Is Alec Baldwin a good candidate for being thrown under the bus?
Keeping this in mind, the question becomes -- 'What are they trying to keep hidden?' What have they been censoring us on?
What is the Cabal's plan? What have we been experiencing under Biden? What has been occurring in Australia, New Zealand, UK, Germany, France, Italy, etc.? Do these crack downs in all of these countries give us a clue to the reason behind the Alec Baldwin tragedy? Again, what message does it promote? Gun control? A message to the victim's husband? Why? What is its implication for the bigger picture here?
The same guy too was on both sets.
No, he wasn't. Stop.
My bad, Gateway Pundit is sometimes hasty on their reporting...the guy was on the Crow sequel it seems but not the original (unless it got scrubbed)
Thanks, but I know that. It's similar to seeing crisis actors used again and again. To these evil bastards, it doesn't matter if its real or not. If a passenger plane was purposely blown-up to change the narrative and distract from the evil plans the Cabal is trying to set in place, they would do it. To them, it doesn't matter who is sacrificed or thrown under the bus.
Again, "Who benefits from this tragedy?" I don't see the White hats benefiting from it. Therefore, this is 'chaff' to distract from their evil plans.
Well the director was shot as well...
Also the armourer was a green haired feminazi lol her tiktoks are super cringe.
I have to say, that’s pretty F’d up.
As "juul pen guy" has put it before.....
"W○@h"
This is truly baffling.
On the one hand, these do sound like a suspicious gathering of "coincidences." But then again, on the old "infinite number of monkey typing on an infinite number of typewriters and one will come up with a Shakespeare sonnet" idea, over a long period of time such things might indeed happen. But it is curious, isn't it?
No number of monkeys typing forever will ever write Shakespeare. A sonnet is a product of conscious expression not random occurrence. Pseudointellectual bs.
You miss the point; it's a mathematical supposition, not reproducible in real life. Since an infinite amount of monkeys, and an infinite amount of typewriters, and an infinite length of time are all impossible to replicate, math comes to this supposition by logic. https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/17152/given-an-infinite-number-of-monkeys-and-an-infinite-amount-of-time-would-one-of
From that link: "The answer is yes, With infinite time and all of the infinite monkeys will produce hamlet and every other works infinitely many times."
But you miss the larger implication. While I admitted that, yes the "coincidences" do seem a bit odd, on the other hand, in all of time and space such coincidences might be possible.
It’s a stupid and false mathematical supposition
Sigh... if you say so.
Nah, I'm mature enough, and seasoned enough, that disagreements no longer bother me. I get that people can have different ideas and opinions.... it's just a pity that others don't extend that same courtesy to others. They have their own purity tests, not much different from the NPC's that we make fun of here. Better things to do with my time, fren.
I see where you going with your statement fellow Tennessean. But then I think about our creator. In one hand Christians believe in God, believe He is the creator. Then on the other, believe the big band theory, and billions of years of evolution. Cant have both. Either creation happened, or infinite time did. And like this situation, either someone created these situations, and let them play out..or chance did. I usually go with creation. I’ve come to learn that only God can explain why these amazing coincidences happen.
Of course it is. Time doesn’t automatically allow for all possibilities. Some things are impossible no matter how much time and repetition. Take your pathetic arrogant sigh somewhere else.
🤣 Silly girl.
I almost didn't comment the first time because I knew there was a chance you would post this stupid shit. It's not new. Or true. It is you who miss the larger implication. The universe isn't random. Most of us didn't evolve from monkeys. You see things that are obviously connected, like all of the things mentioned above. These are the parts that are known publicly. The other 90% is yet to be reveled... and you "admit" "in all of time and space such coincidences might be possible"...Yikes! my dude. Grease the hamster wheel.
Well having different opinions among us is what separates us from the liberals, AND the monkeys.
The "infinite monkeys" conjecture is not a difference of opinion. It is a Darwinian ant- creation God spin that illuminates dysfunctional cognition in the spinner.
the infinite monkeys will create random incoherent garbage infinitely.
...but but but...mathematically we can calculate how many Mc 1/4 pounders properly stacked it would require to turn Uranus on it's side! 1/4 pounders might create galaxies!!
I would put it in the same category of retardthink as the preposition that a mentally unstable man in a dress with a fetid mangina is in any way, shape or form a "real woman".
Darwin was a commie. Fuck him too.
https://answersingenesis.org/charles-darwin/racism/the-darwinian-foundation-of-communism/
One more Godless heathen. Probably was a kiddie fiddler too.
^^^
If you want to actually get onto the math then you will realize that there is actually a higher probability of monkeys with typewriters coming up with a particular Shakespearean play than there is of this scenario that we are discussing being completely a coincidence. But it actually did happen. Which proves it's not a coincidence. Which is actually obvious if you don't have your head up your ass. If you want to argue about the math then try and prove me wrong. We don't even need to turn it into a religious of philosophical argument either because it's actually quantifiable.
The main coincidence is the woman with the Murmansk history getting into the tight little world of Hollywood, where her chances of being next to someone connected to the movie would suddenly increase and then it would look like a lot of coincidences.
....which is not a coincidence at all, it sounds more like a mission she carried out. Planned probably?
So who put her on this mission?