Anon gazes into the Red October abyss, which gazes back at Anon…🧐
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
On the one hand, these do sound like a suspicious gathering of "coincidences." But then again, on the old "infinite number of monkey typing on an infinite number of typewriters and one will come up with a Shakespeare sonnet" idea, over a long period of time such things might indeed happen. But it is curious, isn't it?
No number of monkeys typing forever will ever write Shakespeare. A sonnet is a product of conscious expression not random occurrence. Pseudointellectual bs.
You miss the point; it's a mathematical supposition, not reproducible in real life. Since an infinite amount of monkeys, and an infinite amount of typewriters, and an infinite length of time are all impossible to replicate, math comes to this supposition by logic. https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/17152/given-an-infinite-number-of-monkeys-and-an-infinite-amount-of-time-would-one-of
From that link: "The answer is yes, With infinite time and all of the infinite monkeys will produce hamlet and every other works infinitely many times."
But you miss the larger implication. While I admitted that, yes the "coincidences" do seem a bit odd, on the other hand, in all of time and space such coincidences might be possible.
It’s a stupid and false mathematical supposition
Sigh... if you say so.
I almost didn't comment the first time because I knew there was a chance you would post this stupid shit. It's not new. Or true. It is you who miss the larger implication. The universe isn't random. Most of us didn't evolve from monkeys. You see things that are obviously connected, like all of the things mentioned above. These are the parts that are known publicly. The other 90% is yet to be reveled... and you "admit" "in all of time and space such coincidences might be possible"...Yikes! my dude. Grease the hamster wheel.
Well having different opinions among us is what separates us from the liberals, AND the monkeys.
If you want to actually get onto the math then you will realize that there is actually a higher probability of monkeys with typewriters coming up with a particular Shakespearean play than there is of this scenario that we are discussing being completely a coincidence. But it actually did happen. Which proves it's not a coincidence. Which is actually obvious if you don't have your head up your ass. If you want to argue about the math then try and prove me wrong. We don't even need to turn it into a religious of philosophical argument either because it's actually quantifiable.
The main coincidence is the woman with the Murmansk history getting into the tight little world of Hollywood, where her chances of being next to someone connected to the movie would suddenly increase and then it would look like a lot of coincidences.
....which is not a coincidence at all, it sounds more like a mission she carried out. Planned probably?
So who put her on this mission?