The phrase, "all the bars would be the same height" isn't wrong per se, but could absolutely be improved upon, OP. It would be much better to rephrase that to say, "same frequency of occurrence" or something along those lines.
If, "frequency" is too big of a word for someone, they're pretty fucking stupid, plain and simple.
You represent our entire movement when you make posts like this designed to be shared. I'm not trying to hate on your post by ANY means, I just want to hold you to a high standard so that you represent us well. That means factual data presented in an intelligent yet effective way.
I totally agree with you that informational images like this need to be easily comprehensible but that doesn't mean they have to be completely dumbed down, either. There's certainly a balance, and again I just want to represent the message well. All the best, pede.
The phrase, "all the bars would be the same height" isn't wrong per se, but could absolutely be improved upon, OP. It would be much better to rephrase that to say, "same frequency of occurrence" or something along those lines.
If, "frequency" is too big of a word for someone, they're pretty fucking stupid, plain and simple.
You represent our entire movement when you make posts like this designed to be shared. I'm not trying to hate on your post by ANY means, I just want to hold you to a high standard so that you represent us well. That means factual data presented in an intelligent yet effective way.
I totally agree with you that informational images like this need to be easily comprehensible but that doesn't mean they have to be completely dumbed down, either. There's certainly a balance, and again I just want to represent the message well. All the best, pede.
That's something you defend in the comment sections of the places you post this at. Don't forget Carlin's words.