True enough.

INFOSEC / INFOWAR absolutely leverages the misinfo.

My logic is clear - Q said “No” which to me was marching orders.

Q didn’t say something that was meant to encourage us on those lines. Maybe it was misinfo meant to keep such a simple attack on the “movement” or “goal” of the OP? As you said - we don’t know.

What I do know was Q said this in a way that even the most pragmatic could see those us of pushing the idea and then look to Q posts, directly, and say “even Q denies this.”

That to me was “leave it alone”.

In Game Theory - if this was true - shining light on it at the wrong time is heavily negative and encourages a factor not wanted.