49
Comments (43)
sorted by:
14
SuckaFree 14 points ago +15 / -1

What she does with her private time is up to her. However, I agree with the decision. Not with the way she was doxxed, but we can't have it one way. Our side has successfully protested against the infiltration of transgenderism, the use of LGBT "Pride" memorabilia, Drag Queen "story hour," etc in our schools. We've also successfully protested for the removal of people in our schools who have done the same thing as this woman.

As a parent, I don't care if it's a "private" endeavor. I don't want people associating with my daughter who feel it's ok to sell your body for money. I don't want my daughter exposed to the kinks that get people off, or exposed to the people who perpetuate it, even if they do it in a private setting. This woman is a part of an industry that preys on girls and women, and our schools and govts have NO BUSINESS associating with anyone from that "community."

-5
muhqtardtho -5 points ago +2 / -7

That's just false. People in the porn industry who work for bigger companies can be considered 'trafficking victims' if they've been coerced but having an OF is literally the definition of being an independent contractor. You can have your opinion on who should and shouldn't be in charge of children but the idea that being on OF somehow means you're part of an industry that preys on women and girls is asinine. Its actually the one avenue that does empower women to be their own ceo instead of having to go down the casting couch route where they must perform for their agents and producers in order to get paid work.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

The entire porn industry and promiscuity is pushed by Jews to annihilate good society and raise slaves instead.

Stop being an animal and start being human.

-1
AusStormWatcher -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sir, I believe I found your hate Mathew 24:9 The nation is like a mighty lion; When it is sleeping, no one dares wake it. Whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, And whoever curses Israel will be cursed.” Mathew 7:3 And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? John 8:7 “When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, ‘Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.’” Also I do believe I am seeing you downvoting all of my comments on this thread without reading them.

1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm starting to think you're a Jew.

You insist on putting words in my mouth and feelings in my heart that do not reflect reality.

Modern day Israel IS NOT Biblical Israel. Modern Jews are not Biblical Jews, they are worshippers of Satan according to none other than Jesus Christ.

All you're doing is making excuses for not just your sins but your active encouragement to sin.

You are possessed by a demon and walking towards hell. No amount of falsely citing scripture will save you from your fate if you don't stop.

0
Aditon 0 points ago +1 / -1

They are not directly or intentionally worshipping Satan, nor do most of their worshipping efforts go to Satan.

I agree with you the Synagogue of Satan is alive and well, certainly making moves all over the world, especially in Israel.

But you have to think about the normal people that live in that country. The women, children, and meek people who live their lives and try to worship Yahweh as they were taught. They are caught in a matrix of lies, much like the west is with the Deep State/Cabal and the Mockingbird Media. If they only knew the truth, they would come to Yeshua as fast as possible.

2
AusStormWatcher 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please STUDY the bible: Even wikipedia knows! Synagogue of Satan In the letters to the early Christian churches of Smyrna and Philadelphia in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9, reference is made to a synagogue of Satan, in each case referring to a group persecuting the church "who say they are Jews and are not".Wikipedia

0
Aditon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Okay thanks for pointing that out, I’ll have to research that more.

0
Aditon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Israel is the body of Christ now. The "nation" of Israel stole the name "Israel" from the body of Christ, as a ploy to appear like the biblical group that deserves to live there. It's a facade.

I have no opinion about whether the nation of Israel is legit or not, nor do I give a fuck. At this point if families, women and children, generations of people have put roots down, anyone that wants them to leave is going to have to kill a lot of innocent people and I'm against that. I don't hate Jews, I'm Christian, love them, and consider them like cousins. Cousins that just don't get it yet. They are so close to the truth, they just need to be freed. But they aren't "Israel" from the bible. They are just Israel like Mexico is Mexico.

11
EUssr 11 points ago +12 / -1

A mom should not have an OnlyFans. No woman should. Only selfish and narcissistic whores do.

Real women know that having any obscene material of themselves would ruin the childhood of their kid or future kids. Hence they will never do it for that reason.

And no decent man would ever get near a whore that exposes herself like that.

Tolerating such repulsive degeneracy is what got us down this slippery drop to begin with.

4
MAGAngelo 4 points ago +4 / -0

To those who disagree/downvote.....

TRUTH HURTS

10
Hannahmac584 10 points ago +11 / -1

having an OnlyFans account and "what happens in private" , kind of contradictory... If she's stripping inside of her home for her husband, none of my business.. BUT, OnlyFans is NOT done in privacy... so there's that...

5
OGpat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nah, I don’t want a lesbian e-whore assisting with my kids education or green haired SJW libtards. They can all pound sand. Homeschooling is the way right now.

4
PompeiusMagnus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait, I thought showing your coochie to the internet was a leftist-approved feminist act?

3
entwickelnden 3 points ago +3 / -0

nope. gtfo shill.

2
Kekshot 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's one thing to have sex with someone you like and who likes you back. And I'm not so righteous as to be able to pass judgement on anything done by consenting adults behind closed doors. What the left wants to do , is to turn all women into something lesser than prostitutes, selling their bodies not due to an addiction or the despair that leads some towards dark paths in life, but for a little rush of dopamine and some stats on a screen that actually mean nothing.

2
SoMuchWinning45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Careful, you'll trigger those that want to police what you do in your own home.

2
TheyWereCones 2 points ago +2 / -0

imagine if they knew how many students they have had with stripper moms or parents that have been paid for a "favor" wtf. this is gayer than gay

2
ProPatriaMori 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course she should be held accountable for her decisions. Why give her a pass for her degenerate lifestyle? Feeding the porn monster that consumes innocence and innocents, makes victims of children, women and men. Break the cycle or pay the price. I have no mercy for this

2
Threeballes 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think she forfeited her chance to chaperone young kids by choosing this lifestyle. She likely knew the risk she was taking.

2
ArcaneSlang 2 points ago +2 / -0

So that’s the best volunteer schools can get? Pull your kids, Pedes.

1
chickyrogue 1 point ago +1 / -0

larens beez karens

1
Notimportant2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, as a mom and grandma, I wouldn't want her anywhere near my babies. I wouldn't want a transvestite near them either. The good hearted whore in Gone With the Wind should not be around children either. Our job is to protect their innocence.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
AusStormWatcher 1 point ago +3 / -2

God did give us desire and sexuality. I do believe rome and translations have screwed up the true meaning/way we were given. I cannot preach or confirm because im adding and subtracting from the bible. I dont want to lead people astray. Humans have been given this. It is a natural desire but it needs to be used like a loaded weapon

2
6daysandrest 2 points ago +2 / -0

Song of Solomon is a beautiful scripture basically about the passion and love between a husband and wife. Chapter 2 verse 3 is pretty poetry that contradicts the prudes pushing an ascetic chastity. So long as sex is in marriage, is engaged in willingly, lovingly, and joyfully, it is a blessing.

All of Song of Solomon is pretty poetry describing passion in love and some poetry describing certain sex acts forbidden by the Catechism.

1
AusStormWatcher 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you friend, although this world is full of perversions, our image is in God. Passion and desire are parts of Love. With the caveat I put in that we have to be careful with it. Greek and Hebrew translations have been altered at their very core, the words lust and the greek pornia the meanings have been altered by Rome to suit them. Like I stated earlier I will not preach it but a quick glance at church teachings say "pornography didnt exist so it cant be specifically condemned.. BUT IT IS CONDEMNED" and so on.. it ABSOLUTELY existed from the dawn of humans up through Jesus time and up till now. A quick look at history and a check in linguistics blows the "norm" totally out of the water. And yes the Song of songs does show a passionate marriage. Also with a man with multiple wives, which was never condemned or commanded yet the church will tell you....

2
6daysandrest 2 points ago +2 / -0

I disagree with respect to the multiple wives part. That got covered in Genesis and again when Christ talked about creation and adultery. We aren't meant to have multiple wives. That said, Solomon was not damned for his philandering ways but his kingdom did suffer for it.

1
AusStormWatcher 1 point ago +1 / -0

Certainly welcome to disagree, this is the part im working out right now, I really dont want multiple wives 1 is too many lol. I have lost trust watching preachers mandate vax and masks as well as blatent lies from the bible proclaiming to be the guiders of sheep.

2
6daysandrest 2 points ago +2 / -0

With respect to preachers, trust, and lies, I'm right there with you.

A buddy of mine in the SDA (I'm not SDA, used to attend) informed me the SDA corporate church will not even allow the use of their letterhead for religious exemption letters. This, after that organization insists on tithes and offerings.

That same organization has as one of its fundamental beliefs, that one should abstain from alcohol. This despite Deuteronomy 14:26, the repeated wine offerings of the Old Testament, the wedding party at Caina, etc.

This same organization in whose hospitals abortions were performed for over 50 years and who only recently (October 2019) took an official stance on abortion.

This same organization who took over 50 years to take an official stance on homosexuality.

When it comes to hypocritical pastors who want to collect tithes but don't bother to take a moral stance on anything, yeah. I'm right there with you.

2
6daysandrest 2 points ago +2 / -0

The error in your post is not in its content but in the context that you made it. What you said is true in a certain context but in this context it comes off as supportive of promiscuity and sexual degeneracy.

It's clear to me you are making a general comment on human sexuality and the Bible with a side criticism of the Roman Catholic Church but to others it almost looks like you are endorsing or at least are excusing the actions of a degenerate woman who engaged in lesbian sexual activities for money.

Just a suggestion, consider how your poat will be perceived based on where you post it.

1
AusStormWatcher 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thats why i didnt go too much into it, its complex. And has a strange history, I also come from a place where the spirit of religion is not the spirit of Christ. It goes me>Christ>God. not me>gatekeeper (preacher or pope) arbitur if truth> Jesus>God

2
6daysandrest 2 points ago +2 / -0

But it is you->Christ->Father. It's not you->pope/pastor/Mary->Christ->Father.

We go direct to Christ and direct to the Father. The Lord's prayer shows us how.

0
EUssr 0 points ago +2 / -2

You are just rationalizing your failure to remain pure and your contribution to the degeneration and destruction of society.

1
AusStormWatcher 1 point ago +2 / -1

And you can believe that, but i dont believe you

1
EUssr 1 point ago +2 / -1

By your reasoning God is telling you to shoot up heroin.

Go get shot by your government for not taking the shot.

1
AusStormWatcher 1 point ago +1 / -0

No

0
EUssr 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes. And you better watch your mouth because you will go to hell for spouting such nonsense and turning people from God.

Purity into marriage is not up for debate. And the absolute state of society shows why.

0
AusStormWatcher 0 points ago +1 / -1

I feel sorry for you friend, please STUDY your bible. Dont be full of hate and anger. Look at the greek and hebrew meanings. Good luck friend

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

You need to stop projecting.

There is no hate in me.

And you should heed your own advice. Because my word is of the Bible. Yours is of Satan, the deceiver.

If you wish to proceed to hell, by all means, continue.

I am telling you the path that you are on so you may turn around before it's too late.

-1
aPosteriori -1 points ago +2 / -3

It isn’t private though. She posted it online.