So if about 150 million Americans (around 45% of population) that'd be practically 1 out 2 of those vaccinated would be experiencing an adverse event of some kind.
Would the cognitive dissonance and propoganda be strong enough for that percentage of adverse reactions to go unreported? I'd say yes.
A good 4 women I know have mentioned having "unusual or excessive menstrual bleeding" and I've noticed they were all vaccinated just a month or two prior to it occurring. Only one of them accepts believing it could've been linked to the vaccine.
I was re-reading the study again the other day and it actually says fewer than 1%. If we account for the manipulation caught and fear in reporting... your number is probably on the low side... and that doesn’t include long term effects.
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.”
Feb 26 2021 "CDC caught shaving DEATH's from VAERS System!" https://www.bitchute.com/video/IusxOn0sWL59/
And yet the left will say the vaers system isn’t verified enough to be counted as reliable.
That also works out to over 81M adverse events if they are under reported as well.
So if about 150 million Americans (around 45% of population) that'd be practically 1 out 2 of those vaccinated would be experiencing an adverse event of some kind.
Would the cognitive dissonance and propoganda be strong enough for that percentage of adverse reactions to go unreported? I'd say yes.
A good 4 women I know have mentioned having "unusual or excessive menstrual bleeding" and I've noticed they were all vaccinated just a month or two prior to it occurring. Only one of them accepts believing it could've been linked to the vaccine.
I was re-reading the study again the other day and it actually says fewer than 1%. If we account for the manipulation caught and fear in reporting... your number is probably on the low side... and that doesn’t include long term effects.
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf “Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.”
And that was before people were terrified to report their symptoms due to social stigmas. Which is being reported now from those suffering. Fear of reprisal https://patriots.win/p/13zfvWgmXZ/vax-adverse-reactions-underrepor/c/
https://patriots.win/p/13zgSLLV6U/now-they-are-censoring-vaers/c/
Feb 26 2021 "CDC caught shaving DEATH's from VAERS System!" https://www.bitchute.com/video/IusxOn0sWL59/ And yet the left will say the vaers system isn’t verified enough to be counted as reliable.