I've talked about this quite frequently that VAERS data cannot cannot cannot be used to make these types of inferences, because VAERS data both REQUIRES reporting of cases that are unlikely to be related to the vaccine, AND cases are not in any way vetted before being posted to VAERS. It's designed as a resource for medical researchers to focus in on very specific areas, and doesn't actually prove that even a single person died from the vaccine. There could be absolutely ZERO deaths from the vaccine, and VAERS would look exactly the way it does today.

VAERS data is available to the public so that all researchers have access to it, but that doesn't mean its data is curated or usable by laypeople.

I'd encourage you to read the how-to page on the VAERS website itself to see these limitations and why the type of conclusions that people like Peters draw simply cannot be supported based on how VAERS itself says it works.

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html

A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.