Yeah, don't vote for who you feel the best candidate is but vote for this candidate so they can beat the other candidate because so jcab and crew will be happy.
I get a lot is on the line here, but this line of thought shouldn't continue on the future, we need to get rid of the two party pendulum, only thing worse is one party dominance.
Provide for me your list of Trump endorsed, America-First candidates that have run on a 3rd party ticket. Go ahead, I'm waiting. I understand that this is larger than political parties but reality is that we stand a way better chance of transforming the GOP from within to be America's Party than we do trying to break them up by using a 3rd party.
Now then, Gary Johnson's pecker is getting cold, you'd better get back to work.
I am voting with you, but I'm just saying generalizing people into two party buckets as we have got us to where we are.
Trump stands for principles and values, republicans don't. If prefer to see Trump endorse people across parties with those values than corral everyone into a single party that over time leads right back to where we are.
Freedom and Liberty. The idea of a free election doesn't work if you believe everyone should only vote for the candidate who can win instead of who represents YOUR values. Could also be said as OUR.
I get my take is idealistic but so was our founding.
I agree. Candidates should be elected on an individual basis instead of party affiliation. The parties of today are just a destraction to con us into believing we have a choice when most politicians are all on the same uniparty team. I can even say that those who forsake their beliefs and morals to "go with what the party wants" make it even worse. However, when a candidate really means what they say and plans to carry out the ideas they claim to support (like Trump did) then voting for "that party" in that instance makes perfect sense. This was one of those cases. Some people still don't get it that not all Republicans are part of the problem. A few slim few democrats are not part of the problem. They need to do a better job of figuring out what team they are on because it hurts all of us.
Well, if they didn't pump 18% more votes into a county with 100% reported votes in order to flip it, then we would be good.
screen shots exist AUDIT
Or those inbreds that always have to go vote 3rd party because they think they actually have a chance in hell of winning just use their damn heads....
Yeah, don't vote for who you feel the best candidate is but vote for this candidate so they can beat the other candidate because so jcab and crew will be happy.
I get a lot is on the line here, but this line of thought shouldn't continue on the future, we need to get rid of the two party pendulum, only thing worse is one party dominance.
Provide for me your list of Trump endorsed, America-First candidates that have run on a 3rd party ticket. Go ahead, I'm waiting. I understand that this is larger than political parties but reality is that we stand a way better chance of transforming the GOP from within to be America's Party than we do trying to break them up by using a 3rd party.
Now then, Gary Johnson's pecker is getting cold, you'd better get back to work.
I am voting with you, but I'm just saying generalizing people into two party buckets as we have got us to where we are.
Trump stands for principles and values, republicans don't. If prefer to see Trump endorse people across parties with those values than corral everyone into a single party that over time leads right back to where we are.
Freedom and Liberty. The idea of a free election doesn't work if you believe everyone should only vote for the candidate who can win instead of who represents YOUR values. Could also be said as OUR.
I get my take is idealistic but so was our founding.
Better yet how about no parties?
I agree. Candidates should be elected on an individual basis instead of party affiliation. The parties of today are just a destraction to con us into believing we have a choice when most politicians are all on the same uniparty team. I can even say that those who forsake their beliefs and morals to "go with what the party wants" make it even worse. However, when a candidate really means what they say and plans to carry out the ideas they claim to support (like Trump did) then voting for "that party" in that instance makes perfect sense. This was one of those cases. Some people still don't get it that not all Republicans are part of the problem. A few slim few democrats are not part of the problem. They need to do a better job of figuring out what team they are on because it hurts all of us.
is your modeling with or without the fraud?
That modeling is about as good as recounting the votes. They need a full forensic audit.
They prefer the term "fortification" over fraud.
kek