I ran across a video interview of a lawyer who explains a legal issue with the vaxx, which people can use against "mandates."
The interesting thing is, he is saying the exact same thing I did several months ago, but he added information about a law that I was unaware of. This makes it a much stronger argument.
The TLDR version is this:
- Pfizer stated that its vaxx trial showed that it was "95% effective" at preventing Covid
- That statement was a lie
- The true difference in the vaxx group and the placebo group was actually less than 1%, which means the "effectiveness" is actually less than 1%
- What they did was to manipulate the statistics, by taking a ratio of a ratio, rather than to simply compare the two groups
- This is the difference between "relative risk" (the 95% number) and "absolute risk" (the less than 1% real number)
- This lawyer points out that there is a law that says that when a drug maker uses a relative risk number in adverstising, it must also use the absolute risk number, which Pfizer has never done
- When a drug make fails to include the absolute risk number, they are engaged in a violation of law, called "misbranding"
- When a drug is misbranded, it is REQUIRED that the drug be REMOVED FROM THE MARKET Therefore, there is no Pfizer drug (even the EUA one) that can be available on the market, because it has been misbranded
- This is likely also the case with the others, although he does not discuss the others
[*NOTE: Even the 1% difference (absolute risk) is a lie because they used fraudulent numbers to get that, as well. They actually had more people report being sick who took the drug than those who got the placebo. There are numerous reasons why the Pfizer study had nothing at all to do with science, but this issue is the best one to use for the mandate]
So, one could ask an employer if the Pfizer drug is "acceptable" as one of the vaxx they can take. The employer is likely to say yes. Once they do that, then the response is that the Pfizer drug was misbranded due to failing to show that the absolute risk was actually less than 1%, and therefore is required to be removed from the market. The point of stating this to an employer is to put on the table the fact that this is all based on fraud and misrepresentation, which is what you want when you are fighting a legal battle.
Interview of attorney:
https://odysee.com/@sgtreport:7/Mitch-copy:f
My posts related to this issue:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJPv3MkS/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcvZXRBO/more-info-on-the-actual-pfizer-v/c/
Yes, excellent work... only problem I see is that Pfizer has never advertised this product.
Truth in Advertising applies to distributors as well as manufacturers. They’ve been strong-arming sellers of nutritional supplements for years. https://www.truthinadvertising.org/dsa-ignoring-illegal-health-claims/
I wonder if any companies identified in this study were punished in any meaningful way.
Yes, the study with the 95% claim is there for the masses to “research” and say “look it works!” The govt is advertising it as “safe and effective” on their behalf.
One last thing about the Pfizer trial. Nobody died of COVID in the control arm. Thus they cannot say it saves lives. You would need data showing that it saves lives but that data doesn’t exist.
Wow! Thanks so much for posting all the information. Excellent work!
Every vaxx dose given is, and has been, experimental. One has the unilateral and undeniable right not to participate in an experiment. Experiment that is monstrous, malicious or epic fail only strengthens right to refuse.
My tool is to say "FUCK YOU!". That usually ends that.
What they do with the stats is common in the pharma marketing. It's done by using relative vs absolute stats. E.g. 2 groups of 100, the placebo group has an disease re occurrence of 2 people, the medicated group has 1 out of 100 have a re-occurrence of the disease. They market the drug as reducing the chance of the disease coming back at 50%.
Their study actually ended up having more people die in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated... 21 dead in vaccinated group 15 dead in unvaccinated https://media.greatawakening.win/post/mfuHpyHy.png
I’ve listened to the entire thing. Kind of wanted to hear about that approval of phizer. How they approved the comirnaty injection that’s not available and all that
Shared everywhere and left you credit except one board that has such limited digit count numbers I had to cut, cut, cut.