Yeah I'm saying you don't understand basic shit like perspective. You clearly don't watch videos because it might challenge your belief system. You're wrong about everything. And you've given me absolutely zero proof. I'm telling you things appear to disappear from the bottom up because of perspective not earth curve. You can watch a boat go "over the horizon " then zoom back in on it with a camera and bring the whole thing back into focus. Cameras can't zoom over something physically blocking your sight. If you had watched the whole video he would have showed you plenty explaining that to you and showing examples. Also the black swan photo which is a picture taken from an observer height of 1 foot and the horizon is roughly 19 miles away, it should be 3 miles from that height. Every amateur rocket not using a gopro shows a flat level horizon that rises to eye level. Impossible on a ball, because if you were up 70,000 ft the drop of the earth at the horizon should be about 150,000 feet below you. The horizon would be noticeably lower, but it always rises to eye level. There is a difference between intelligence and memorizing what you read in a Rockefeller funded textbook and I believe we are seeing that difference right now. Have a good rest of your life because clearly you're too far brainwashed to get this.
Be careful. I spent part of my profession as an optical engineer. I know about perspective, and it has nothing to do with things "disappearing." You can't zoom the mast back into view once it has passed out of view. You can't zoom an airplane back into view once it has flown past the horizon (which should be impossible, because the altitude of the airplane should always produce a positive elevation angle). I've never seen a horizon at "eye level." It would be too high. Height makes a difference, according to the Navy watch-standers who have known about its importance for hundreds of years.
You obviously don't know anything about atmospheric refraction, the thing that causes mirages. The atmosphere is refractive enough to cause the sun to appear touching the horizon when it is already below the geometric horizon. It is pronounced enough for microwaves that, at low elevation angle, it is effective to assume the Earth has an optical radius 4/3 of its geometrical radius. This means that you can, under certain atmospheric conditions, see farther than the geometric radius. But for a flat earth, there should be no seeing over any edge.
Grow up. Knowledge that the Earth is round goes back to Eratosthenes (3rd century B.C.), well before the Rockefellers. It was the thing that prompted Columbus to travel west. And Magellan to circumnavigate a spherical world. It all works, every last bit of it. Complete with evidence. Welcome to the world of intercontinental air travel and orbital space travel.
You seem to be bug-bitten about photos of the whole Earth. Just figure out how far away you have to be to get a photo of the whole Earth, and you would understand why it can't be done in low Earth orbit (but was done during the Apollo missions)---and why a whole Earth image must be pieced together out of the narrow strip maps made by photographic satellites. (How do I get a photo of your face when my only cameras are grains of rice that hover 1 mm above your skin?)
You're going to tell me I've never personally watched a ship go "over the horizon", take out my 60x spotting scope, and was able to completely bring the ship back into view? I have 15 years experience of working on the ocean. I know damn well that ships don't go over a physical horizon. You clearly have never done any actual experimentation of your own. And the picture I mention, the black swan, shows a horizon that's way too far even with your refraction. Like way too far. For the last time, the horizon has absolutely nothing to do with earth curve. Please look up the definition of horizon and tell me where it mentions earth curve. It's freaking perspective. It's how your eyes work. Ever been in a long Vegas hotel hallway and at the very end of the hallway it looks like the floor is almost touching the ceiling? Same thing but on a different scale. And if you put your head to the floor and had someone walk away, guess what, they dissappear from the feet up just like they were going over a curve, but the floor is nice and flat and level. It's pretty simple really. Math problems are only gonna get you so far, you need to do some actual experimentation based off actual observations not what you expect to see. Many long distance laser tests have shown zero curvature. Navy ships using line of sight laser targeting systems can pinpoint ships over 100 miles away. How is that possible when there should be a bulge that's 1.2 miles high between them? Like I said, military ALWAYS assumes a flat non rotating surface when firing artillery. I can pull up a presentation where the artillery guy goes over the documents stating that. It's cleverly put in the handbook but it's never used.
Yeah I'm saying you don't understand basic shit like perspective. You clearly don't watch videos because it might challenge your belief system. You're wrong about everything. And you've given me absolutely zero proof. I'm telling you things appear to disappear from the bottom up because of perspective not earth curve. You can watch a boat go "over the horizon " then zoom back in on it with a camera and bring the whole thing back into focus. Cameras can't zoom over something physically blocking your sight. If you had watched the whole video he would have showed you plenty explaining that to you and showing examples. Also the black swan photo which is a picture taken from an observer height of 1 foot and the horizon is roughly 19 miles away, it should be 3 miles from that height. Every amateur rocket not using a gopro shows a flat level horizon that rises to eye level. Impossible on a ball, because if you were up 70,000 ft the drop of the earth at the horizon should be about 150,000 feet below you. The horizon would be noticeably lower, but it always rises to eye level. There is a difference between intelligence and memorizing what you read in a Rockefeller funded textbook and I believe we are seeing that difference right now. Have a good rest of your life because clearly you're too far brainwashed to get this.
Be careful. I spent part of my profession as an optical engineer. I know about perspective, and it has nothing to do with things "disappearing." You can't zoom the mast back into view once it has passed out of view. You can't zoom an airplane back into view once it has flown past the horizon (which should be impossible, because the altitude of the airplane should always produce a positive elevation angle). I've never seen a horizon at "eye level." It would be too high. Height makes a difference, according to the Navy watch-standers who have known about its importance for hundreds of years.
You obviously don't know anything about atmospheric refraction, the thing that causes mirages. The atmosphere is refractive enough to cause the sun to appear touching the horizon when it is already below the geometric horizon. It is pronounced enough for microwaves that, at low elevation angle, it is effective to assume the Earth has an optical radius 4/3 of its geometrical radius. This means that you can, under certain atmospheric conditions, see farther than the geometric radius. But for a flat earth, there should be no seeing over any edge.
Grow up. Knowledge that the Earth is round goes back to Eratosthenes (3rd century B.C.), well before the Rockefellers. It was the thing that prompted Columbus to travel west. And Magellan to circumnavigate a spherical world. It all works, every last bit of it. Complete with evidence. Welcome to the world of intercontinental air travel and orbital space travel.
You seem to be bug-bitten about photos of the whole Earth. Just figure out how far away you have to be to get a photo of the whole Earth, and you would understand why it can't be done in low Earth orbit (but was done during the Apollo missions)---and why a whole Earth image must be pieced together out of the narrow strip maps made by photographic satellites. (How do I get a photo of your face when my only cameras are grains of rice that hover 1 mm above your skin?)
You're going to tell me I've never personally watched a ship go "over the horizon", take out my 60x spotting scope, and was able to completely bring the ship back into view? I have 15 years experience of working on the ocean. I know damn well that ships don't go over a physical horizon. You clearly have never done any actual experimentation of your own. And the picture I mention, the black swan, shows a horizon that's way too far even with your refraction. Like way too far. For the last time, the horizon has absolutely nothing to do with earth curve. Please look up the definition of horizon and tell me where it mentions earth curve. It's freaking perspective. It's how your eyes work. Ever been in a long Vegas hotel hallway and at the very end of the hallway it looks like the floor is almost touching the ceiling? Same thing but on a different scale. And if you put your head to the floor and had someone walk away, guess what, they dissappear from the feet up just like they were going over a curve, but the floor is nice and flat and level. It's pretty simple really. Math problems are only gonna get you so far, you need to do some actual experimentation based off actual observations not what you expect to see. Many long distance laser tests have shown zero curvature. Navy ships using line of sight laser targeting systems can pinpoint ships over 100 miles away. How is that possible when there should be a bulge that's 1.2 miles high between them? Like I said, military ALWAYS assumes a flat non rotating surface when firing artillery. I can pull up a presentation where the artillery guy goes over the documents stating that. It's cleverly put in the handbook but it's never used.