The only times I've seen "died suddenly" (or some offshoot of it ... like "died unexpectedly") were suicides for the most part. They'd sometimes use it for heart attacks. I think there is something to this overall.
This seems to be the frequency of how often it has been searched for, not the frequency of how many times it has been used by the media. Do I have that incorrect?
The Y-axis on this graph is showing rather low numbers overall... UNLESS (!) the table is truncated somehow and the Y-axis is SUPPOSED to be in x 10, x100, or x 1,000... or something like that. So if these truly are simple raw numbers, (25 average over a 1-year delta and 100 at the end of October 2021, then these aren't very impressive numbers. Also, what is the source of the graph?
The only times I've seen "died suddenly" (or some offshoot of it ... like "died unexpectedly") were suicides for the most part. They'd sometimes use it for heart attacks. I think there is something to this overall.
What tool and/or what search term did you use to create this graph?
This seems to be the frequency of how often it has been searched for, not the frequency of how many times it has been used by the media. Do I have that incorrect?
Fair enough.
I've seen a lot of graphs with this curvature recently, none of them good news.
The Y-axis on this graph is showing rather low numbers overall... UNLESS (!) the table is truncated somehow and the Y-axis is SUPPOSED to be in x 10, x100, or x 1,000... or something like that. So if these truly are simple raw numbers, (25 average over a 1-year delta and 100 at the end of October 2021, then these aren't very impressive numbers. Also, what is the source of the graph?
Looks.like the Wyoming party has work to do. Almost half voted the other way.