Strange and unprecedented
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Arent they online anyways? I saw them posted earlier.
If you can find them again, I’d like to see them. If they were online, why would she need to take a copy home to study?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21112660-wi-v-kyle-rittenhouse-jury-instructions
All i can find now are the jury questions, not the instructions. Either i was mistakenly thinking of that, or i cant find the instructions anymore.
That'll be the Karen looking for a technicality to give Kyle a guilty verdict.
Probably going to consult with a Killary lawyer
Hung jury. :-(
Sounds like we have a Karen on the Jury, and the other 11 can't change her mind. The longer this goes, the more i'm thinking hung jury.
Lawfag here, this was very unusual, at least for my home jurisdiction. I don't know about Wisconsin, but jurors are NOT allowed to conduct their own research on the LAW. The jury is to determine which facts are true based on the evidence presented at the trial. Any questions the jury has about the law (which is what jury instructions are) MUST be asked to the judge. Most times a jury foreperson would write down a question, give it to the Marshal or Sheriff in charge of the jury, who gives it to the judge. The judge calls the attorneys involved into chambers, tells them there is a question(s), then calls all parties into the courtroom, calls in the jury, then answers the questions in the courtroom and on the record. Short answer: jury decides facts, the judge determines the appropriate law for the case. This may be reversible error on the part of this judge, but I hope it does not go that far.
Kyle must be in mental anguish.