345 The Supreme Court has unequivocally stated that a “forcible injection… into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty[.]” Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229 (1990)......How many politicians and doctors and assistances are complicit? (twitter.com) posted 3 years ago by purkiss80 3 years ago by purkiss80 +345 / -0 15 comments share 15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Forcible doesn't apply to cases where one is 'coerced' into having to take it to avoid other barriers
I believe it does. People are being forced.
No, they are being coerced, they could resist, as many did (and lost their jobs over it), but didn't have the courage.
Forcible injection is to literally hold someone down and jab them.
Agreed