Hijacking:
I commented on this before. Read through case info.
Appears to be mentally unstable person filing. Very strange stuff, but didn’t see anything substantial. No details at all that would corroborate.
I think this one is sad and a mental issue. A possible cash grab. But again I say still needs to be addressed by authorities as criminal not civil.
I read through most of the filing the first time it made its rounds, and I dont think anything there proves mental instability. A person who has been abused really severely by these pedo monsters would sound like an unstable person when they make their accusations. That does not mean it is false or they are unstable. The accusations they make clearly shows some element of mind control (not MK-ultra kind of thing, but rather gaslighting/manipulation kind of thing).
The reason why it was dismissed is, I am guessing, she did not have hard evidence to back up such serious claims. Perhaps they filed it prematurely, maybe after Maxwell's case it would be much different. Either way, I am keeping my mind open as we have barely scratched the surface until now.
Fair.
In fact that was close to my first thoughts - the reason for dismissal was a failure to follow through. There were address issues as well.
Additionally, there was a claim of multi-generational abuse, the filers child and grand children if I recall correctly.
I'd have to say its misleading. I mean, Maxwell trial starts just now, and someone posts a court document, without clarifying this NOT from the current case?
That's either low effort or misleading, or both, in my unsolicited opinion.
How is this linked to the Maxwell case? Is this a list that also is to be included in discovery for the Maxwell case? Not wanting to be negative, just looking for clarification
This is a different case - a civil case that was dismissed last year:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/3/latham-v-the-1953-trust/
Bubble I think you now have to assume the role of your name. The "fact checker" that brings the bad news and bursts the posts bubble lol.
Hijacking: I commented on this before. Read through case info.
Appears to be mentally unstable person filing. Very strange stuff, but didn’t see anything substantial. No details at all that would corroborate.
I think this one is sad and a mental issue. A possible cash grab. But again I say still needs to be addressed by authorities as criminal not civil.
I read through most of the filing the first time it made its rounds, and I dont think anything there proves mental instability. A person who has been abused really severely by these pedo monsters would sound like an unstable person when they make their accusations. That does not mean it is false or they are unstable. The accusations they make clearly shows some element of mind control (not MK-ultra kind of thing, but rather gaslighting/manipulation kind of thing).
The reason why it was dismissed is, I am guessing, she did not have hard evidence to back up such serious claims. Perhaps they filed it prematurely, maybe after Maxwell's case it would be much different. Either way, I am keeping my mind open as we have barely scratched the surface until now.
Fair. In fact that was close to my first thoughts - the reason for dismissal was a failure to follow through. There were address issues as well. Additionally, there was a claim of multi-generational abuse, the filers child and grand children if I recall correctly.
Btw, cool name! You waited for a year but your name is not in vain :)
sorrryyy :(
I'd have to say its misleading. I mean, Maxwell trial starts just now, and someone posts a court document, without clarifying this NOT from the current case?
That's either low effort or misleading, or both, in my unsolicited opinion.
Yes I agree with you. Misleading.
<chuckle>
Yeah, I mean, what's up with purkiss? Dude, he is posting some pretty whack stuff these days.
I get you. Agreed.
Yes, that's true. Worth looking at.
But if its been up for more than a year, I doubt it is going to "disappear soon".
Rather than just saying this wont last long, take 1 more step and archive the info and post link here too.
Save before this gets removed...
https://ia801807.us.archive.org/3/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.543369/gov.uscourts.nysd.543369.2.0.pdf
How is this linked to the Maxwell case? Is this a list that also is to be included in discovery for the Maxwell case? Not wanting to be negative, just looking for clarification
Hoping they post the names of all the John and Jane Does soon!
Charlene Latham civil suit vs 1953 Trust, Weinstein, & Carter
I wonder what the real number is - when one line represents 1 -100 or an organization. I wish I was on the jury!
Rico act? Sealed indictments?
Maybe
"City of new Yok"
Typos in a document like this?
Truth of the matter is that that 700 page case will go no where.