Hijacking:
I commented on this before. Read through case info.
Appears to be mentally unstable person filing. Very strange stuff, but didn’t see anything substantial. No details at all that would corroborate.
I think this one is sad and a mental issue. A possible cash grab. But again I say still needs to be addressed by authorities as criminal not civil.
I read through most of the filing the first time it made its rounds, and I dont think anything there proves mental instability. A person who has been abused really severely by these pedo monsters would sound like an unstable person when they make their accusations. That does not mean it is false or they are unstable. The accusations they make clearly shows some element of mind control (not MK-ultra kind of thing, but rather gaslighting/manipulation kind of thing).
The reason why it was dismissed is, I am guessing, she did not have hard evidence to back up such serious claims. Perhaps they filed it prematurely, maybe after Maxwell's case it would be much different. Either way, I am keeping my mind open as we have barely scratched the surface until now.
Fair.
In fact that was close to my first thoughts - the reason for dismissal was a failure to follow through. There were address issues as well.
Additionally, there was a claim of multi-generational abuse, the filers child and grand children if I recall correctly.
This is a different case - a civil case that was dismissed last year:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/3/latham-v-the-1953-trust/
Bubble I think you now have to assume the role of your name. The "fact checker" that brings the bad news and bursts the posts bubble lol.
Hijacking: I commented on this before. Read through case info.
Appears to be mentally unstable person filing. Very strange stuff, but didn’t see anything substantial. No details at all that would corroborate.
I think this one is sad and a mental issue. A possible cash grab. But again I say still needs to be addressed by authorities as criminal not civil.
I read through most of the filing the first time it made its rounds, and I dont think anything there proves mental instability. A person who has been abused really severely by these pedo monsters would sound like an unstable person when they make their accusations. That does not mean it is false or they are unstable. The accusations they make clearly shows some element of mind control (not MK-ultra kind of thing, but rather gaslighting/manipulation kind of thing).
The reason why it was dismissed is, I am guessing, she did not have hard evidence to back up such serious claims. Perhaps they filed it prematurely, maybe after Maxwell's case it would be much different. Either way, I am keeping my mind open as we have barely scratched the surface until now.
Fair. In fact that was close to my first thoughts - the reason for dismissal was a failure to follow through. There were address issues as well. Additionally, there was a claim of multi-generational abuse, the filers child and grand children if I recall correctly.
Btw, cool name! You waited for a year but your name is not in vain :)
sorrryyy :(
<chuckle>
Yeah, I mean, what's up with purkiss? Dude, he is posting some pretty whack stuff these days.
I get you. Agreed.
Yes, that's true. Worth looking at.
But if its been up for more than a year, I doubt it is going to "disappear soon".