I simply stated promises of peace and safety aren't a good benchmark, and your reply started this entire tangent.
No, what you're doing is posting your unknowable, potentially fallible ideas on a political forum and, because your points can't stand on their own, you back them up with bible passages.
This is you:
Brokering peace in the middle east is worthless because the bible says so. Kushner bad because the bible says so.
For me it's more about you invoking God's word incorrectly to win arguments when your shoddy opinion wasn't enough to make your point.
That's a shameful use of God's word.
I don't know whether Kushner is good or bad. It's all varying degrees of certainty when there is no real way of knowing something in the fog of war. I can say Kushner was trusted by Trump and appeared to do a good job on what Trump asked him to do, so it's probable that he's ok.
That's a far cry from what you do.
You're riding Kushner's jockstrap very hard.
Here's a scripture for you, since you like them so much.
Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers. Ephesians 4:29
You weaving in and out from quoting scripture and making gay sex references to win arguments is exactly why you shouldn't be quoting scripture.
I wasn't trying to win an argument. I simply pointed out promises of peace and safety are not always a good thing and you lost it.
You claim I'm invoking God's Word incorrectly, yet you had no idea the Old Testament contains the Gospel message or that Jesus and His disciples preached the gospel long before the Resurrection.
And, yes, I'm a sinner and said you're riding Jared's jockstrap. I could have used a kinder phrase, but it's clear your pride has gotten the best of you here. You're fawning over Jared way too much if you don't even know whether he's good or bad.
In fact, remove Jared from the discussion. Anybody promising peace and safety should be treated with a healthy skepticism. That was my point, and you're too daft to get it.
you had no idea the Old Testament contains the Gospel message or that Jesus and His disciples preached the gospel long before the Resurrection
Moved goalpost from temple mount speech to "before the Resurrection"? Temple mount speech was early in the events of the New Testament and wasn't made specifically to the disciples, but to average jews of the day.
That you would feel the need to argue things so trivial to the great awkening here on a Q board, where the focus is on the great awakening and consists of people from all walks of life, even atheists, homosexuals etc., is ridiculous.
Trump hugged a gay pride flag. Trump hires gays. Would you walk up to his face and tell, "No, you can't do that, you must cater to Christians only, and not only Christians, but those who understand Old Testament blah blah"...
You're such a farce I'm inclined to believe your only purpose here is to shrink the great awakening tent so small as to be ineffective.
In other words, you're a shill.
You're fawning over Jared way too much
Not about Kushner at all.
You could pick any argument contrarian to Q, quoted an out-of-context bible verse to it in order to solidify your shoddy point and seen the same reaction from me.
No, what you're doing is posting your unknowable, potentially fallible ideas on a political forum and, because your points can't stand on their own, you back them up with bible passages.
This is you:
Completely revolting.
You're riding Kushner's jockstrap very hard.
For me it's more about you invoking God's word incorrectly to win arguments when your shoddy opinion wasn't enough to make your point.
That's a shameful use of God's word.
I don't know whether Kushner is good or bad. It's all varying degrees of certainty when there is no real way of knowing something in the fog of war. I can say Kushner was trusted by Trump and appeared to do a good job on what Trump asked him to do, so it's probable that he's ok.
That's a far cry from what you do.
Here's a scripture for you, since you like them so much.
You weaving in and out from quoting scripture and making gay sex references to win arguments is exactly why you shouldn't be quoting scripture.
I wasn't trying to win an argument. I simply pointed out promises of peace and safety are not always a good thing and you lost it.
You claim I'm invoking God's Word incorrectly, yet you had no idea the Old Testament contains the Gospel message or that Jesus and His disciples preached the gospel long before the Resurrection.
And, yes, I'm a sinner and said you're riding Jared's jockstrap. I could have used a kinder phrase, but it's clear your pride has gotten the best of you here. You're fawning over Jared way too much if you don't even know whether he's good or bad.
In fact, remove Jared from the discussion. Anybody promising peace and safety should be treated with a healthy skepticism. That was my point, and you're too daft to get it.
Moved goalpost from temple mount speech to "before the Resurrection"? Temple mount speech was early in the events of the New Testament and wasn't made specifically to the disciples, but to average jews of the day.
That you would feel the need to argue things so trivial to the great awkening here on a Q board, where the focus is on the great awakening and consists of people from all walks of life, even atheists, homosexuals etc., is ridiculous.
Trump hugged a gay pride flag. Trump hires gays. Would you walk up to his face and tell, "No, you can't do that, you must cater to Christians only, and not only Christians, but those who understand Old Testament blah blah"...
You're such a farce I'm inclined to believe your only purpose here is to shrink the great awakening tent so small as to be ineffective.
In other words, you're a shill.
Not about Kushner at all.
You could pick any argument contrarian to Q, quoted an out-of-context bible verse to it in order to solidify your shoddy point and seen the same reaction from me.