The health implications of 5G are very troubling. More countries need to follow Slovenia's lead. There may be an alternative though.
Since 5G relies on higher frequency for propagation, the higher frequency works against its ability to propagate distance-wise. Higher frequency is the inverse of distance traveled. This means much more power is required for transmission and many more booster/repeater transmitters (cells) are required. All this to make things 10 times faster. These cells are said to be required on every city block.
Keep this in mind for a moment.
Essentially, these 5G cells have become line-of-sight to each other. Can anyone tell me why Light Fidelity (LiFi) isn't considered when it travel a 100 times faster than standard Wi-Fi? Yes, Wi-Fi is not 5G, but LiFi is still steadily growing in transmission range and overcoming obstacles in transmission paths. LiFi has strengths in energy efficiency and ultra-wide bandwidth.
As it stands, 5G networks does offer an extremely high capacity for novel streaming applications. One of the most promising approaches is to embed large numbers of cooperating small cells into the macro-cell coverage area.
Alternatively, LiFi can be adopted as an alternative physical layer, offering higher data rates. Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) optical wireless is resistant to obstacles and is capable of adapting its throughput according to the current channel state information.
Check out the Spanish group of scientists that have been researching the science and investigating impacts of 5g combined with graphene oxide (which is present in a LOT of our lives) - La Quinta Columna. If you don't speak/read Spanish, Orwell.city has translations of their videos and publications.
The documented impact of wireless radiation is severe, and if you really knew, you would NEVER have the devices near your body while operating. If you allow your children to put a device on their laps, you're essentially killing their reproductive systems, among other things.
EDIT: noting this channel reposts other stuff at low resolution, so the speakers aren't associated with the channel owner.
The health implications of 5G are very troubling. More countries need to follow Slovenia's lead. There may be an alternative though.
Since 5G relies on higher frequency for propagation, the higher frequency works against its ability to propagate distance-wise. Higher frequency is the inverse of distance traveled. This means much more power is required for transmission and many more booster/repeater transmitters (cells) are required. All this to make things 10 times faster. These cells are said to be required on every city block.
Keep this in mind for a moment.
Essentially, these 5G cells have become line-of-sight to each other. Can anyone tell me why Light Fidelity (LiFi) isn't considered when it travel a 100 times faster than standard Wi-Fi? Yes, Wi-Fi is not 5G, but LiFi is still steadily growing in transmission range and overcoming obstacles in transmission paths. LiFi has strengths in energy efficiency and ultra-wide bandwidth.
As it stands, 5G networks does offer an extremely high capacity for novel streaming applications. One of the most promising approaches is to embed large numbers of cooperating small cells into the macro-cell coverage area.
Alternatively, LiFi can be adopted as an alternative physical layer, offering higher data rates. Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) optical wireless is resistant to obstacles and is capable of adapting its throughput according to the current channel state information.
https://www.velmenni.com/blog/light-communication/
IMHO, I see this technology as being so much better than 5G. The power of light. We can do this.
Ty. Now I want to look into life. Makes sense.
That's 'LIFI'...... But it will save life. And it's so much faster than 5G.
ty
oh and my mind of its own deep state phone changed the word.....I hate that so much!
Check out the Spanish group of scientists that have been researching the science and investigating impacts of 5g combined with graphene oxide (which is present in a LOT of our lives) - La Quinta Columna. If you don't speak/read Spanish, Orwell.city has translations of their videos and publications.
The documented impact of wireless radiation is severe, and if you really knew, you would NEVER have the devices near your body while operating. If you allow your children to put a device on their laps, you're essentially killing their reproductive systems, among other things.
EDIT: noting this channel reposts other stuff at low resolution, so the speakers aren't associated with the channel owner.
A 22 with a suppressor should do the trick. Ping Ping Ping... DONE!
This dipstick needs to get his thoughts together before wasting my time.
An ad hominem attack does not address the actual ideas here, only the person, and as such is considered a logical fallacy.
If you have contradictory information, please post it here, as this subject seems to be a serious one.