So you didn’t even look at the video? Ahh okay, no evidence for the otherside.
Again, NASA, the army, the navy, the Soviet’s, all believe in a “flat, non-rotating earth”.
All one can do is offer you a red suppository, you have decided to take the easy to swallow blue pill. Programming at early stages is very effective, hence why the schools are so important. Your attacking this red suppository, as the left attacks the right.
You remind me of “my cousin vinny”, instead of hearing the defense present it’s case, you only listened to the prosecution, and the defendants sound guilty as sin. But you and I know that wasn’t the end of the story.
Lastly, using 3rd century bc to say the earth is round…. the Bible, beginning of time, and ALL the ancients believed what NASA, army, navy, CIA, and soviets believed, in a flat non-rotating earth.
Geophysical? At what height do you start to see the curvature of the earth? Really no point in debating you, as you cannot defend the heliocentric model, as you assumed it to be truth based on what your schoolbooks told you growing up. I can tel you a lot of the numbers in the geophysics that NASA tells us involve 666. Coincidence?
I/DeathRayDesigner is an obvious shill. Of course shim did not watch the material but has a a lot of words against it (they are likely paid by word). Please don't waste your time on this obvious shill. Shim made a point to stalk mine as well. I am always interested in your posts and input. I feel we are on a very similar wavelength. This shill got me angry and please don't let it do it to you. Block and report the obvious shill. Curious why shim is so interested in derail8ng this particular thread. You are a good dude, don't let this looserbshill affect you.
Our lost/reset history is fascinating, no shil(s)l will be able to obstruct this research. God Bless!
Since all these people have been involved with long-range ballistic missiles and orbital flight, they most definitely do not believe in a "flat non-rotating earth." That is an approximation valid only where the distances reduce the flight path to a parabola and the time of flight is too short for earth rotation to be significant. Think being in your living room. Is the floor flat? Is the room rotating? (Actually, it is rotating, at about 0.0007 RPM, but try to notice it.) One of my favorite orbital mechanics texts is the one they use at the Air Force Academy.
If you have a case, it can be presented in a few sentences. It is not a subtle concept. You don't need 5 hours. I've seen these videos. All they amount to are recitations of the inability to understand certain phenomena---or to just have a fundamental misunderstanding. In all this, I think I am the only one who is offering information and explanation. If you want to prove the existing photographic evidence is bunk, offer your own photographic evidence. Ah, but you don't have any. And all you can do is complain about limitations. Funny that we understood the spherical earth from the 3rd century B.C. without any fancy science, and now that we are in the 21st century, you can't do anything but make videos about misunderstandings. Why not point out phenomena that can ONLY be explained by a flat earth? You can't. On that point, you are impotent.
Since when did the Bible believe in a flat, non-rotating earth? I've read it 3 or 4 times, paying attention each time. It only speaks of the territory of Israel (and Babylon). The Book of Job refers to the earth being hung in space from the northern wastes. Sure sounds like a dangling ball capable of rotating about the poles. In any case, that is what it is, as God has give us eyes to see and a mind to understand. If we are faithful to God, we believe what He gives us to see. Even Jesus commanded Thomas to see for himself.
At a height of, say, a thousand kilometers, it should be possible to see the whole earth as a round object (though maybe only a small fraction of the whole; greater altitude allows a greater picture). We see aircraft passing over the horizon from ground level, every day. It is hard to tell what you mean by "curvature of the earth." I have never spoken of it in connection with the lateral view of the horizon (though that does become more visibly curved with higher altitude). But it does arise from objects that pass over the horizon and are lost from view. In any case, we have flown around the earth and orbited around it, facts which you cannot disprove, so you need to get used to them.
NASA - https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf Page 12, many many more examples... But remember, we must take into account the Coriolis effect, haha, especially with the earth rotating at 1037mph, and orbiting the sun at 66,600 mph. 666! Many many many more government documents on "flat non-rotating earth".
This guy has a serious case of cognitive dissonance. I just argued with him for a week and he gave up when I told him to look up the definition of horizon and tell me where it mentions anything about earth curve. He thinks the moon missions were real lmao.
Yes. That's the way it is with all exposures of reality. It doesn't take much. And you can't do it. Give me the photograph taken from the Empire State Building of the Eiffel Tower. Show me the photograph of the coast of Africa taken from the coast of Florida. Show me the photograph of Mt. Rainier taken from Hawaii. All it takes is a good telescope and a camera, if you are right---but you don't have any such proofs. They would be pathetically easy to accomplish, but you just don't have them, do you? You ought to think about that.
I also thought of something we haven't discussed: seismic determination of the structure of the Earth. We have a crust, beneath which is a mantle, under which is a core, divided into liquid and solid portions. We derive this picture from sound waves that travel throughout the inner earth to all regions of the world, so the data is compared and integrated. No flat earth results from all this.
We also haven't talked about the fact that it is impossible to accurately present large areas of the Earth on flat maps, because of the distortions resulting from flattening the spherical trigonometry into plane trigonometry. All the map projection systems are approximations, some better than others (the best being polyhedral projections). Why would this be the case, if the geometry is flat to begin with?
So you didn’t even look at the video? Ahh okay, no evidence for the otherside.
Again, NASA, the army, the navy, the Soviet’s, all believe in a “flat, non-rotating earth”. All one can do is offer you a red suppository, you have decided to take the easy to swallow blue pill. Programming at early stages is very effective, hence why the schools are so important. Your attacking this red suppository, as the left attacks the right.
You remind me of “my cousin vinny”, instead of hearing the defense present it’s case, you only listened to the prosecution, and the defendants sound guilty as sin. But you and I know that wasn’t the end of the story.
Lastly, using 3rd century bc to say the earth is round…. the Bible, beginning of time, and ALL the ancients believed what NASA, army, navy, CIA, and soviets believed, in a flat non-rotating earth.
Geophysical? At what height do you start to see the curvature of the earth? Really no point in debating you, as you cannot defend the heliocentric model, as you assumed it to be truth based on what your schoolbooks told you growing up. I can tel you a lot of the numbers in the geophysics that NASA tells us involve 666. Coincidence?
I/DeathRayDesigner is an obvious shill. Of course shim did not watch the material but has a a lot of words against it (they are likely paid by word). Please don't waste your time on this obvious shill. Shim made a point to stalk mine as well. I am always interested in your posts and input. I feel we are on a very similar wavelength. This shill got me angry and please don't let it do it to you. Block and report the obvious shill. Curious why shim is so interested in derail8ng this particular thread. You are a good dude, don't let this looserbshill affect you.
Our lost/reset history is fascinating, no shil(s)l will be able to obstruct this research. God Bless!
Since all these people have been involved with long-range ballistic missiles and orbital flight, they most definitely do not believe in a "flat non-rotating earth." That is an approximation valid only where the distances reduce the flight path to a parabola and the time of flight is too short for earth rotation to be significant. Think being in your living room. Is the floor flat? Is the room rotating? (Actually, it is rotating, at about 0.0007 RPM, but try to notice it.) One of my favorite orbital mechanics texts is the one they use at the Air Force Academy.
If you have a case, it can be presented in a few sentences. It is not a subtle concept. You don't need 5 hours. I've seen these videos. All they amount to are recitations of the inability to understand certain phenomena---or to just have a fundamental misunderstanding. In all this, I think I am the only one who is offering information and explanation. If you want to prove the existing photographic evidence is bunk, offer your own photographic evidence. Ah, but you don't have any. And all you can do is complain about limitations. Funny that we understood the spherical earth from the 3rd century B.C. without any fancy science, and now that we are in the 21st century, you can't do anything but make videos about misunderstandings. Why not point out phenomena that can ONLY be explained by a flat earth? You can't. On that point, you are impotent.
Since when did the Bible believe in a flat, non-rotating earth? I've read it 3 or 4 times, paying attention each time. It only speaks of the territory of Israel (and Babylon). The Book of Job refers to the earth being hung in space from the northern wastes. Sure sounds like a dangling ball capable of rotating about the poles. In any case, that is what it is, as God has give us eyes to see and a mind to understand. If we are faithful to God, we believe what He gives us to see. Even Jesus commanded Thomas to see for himself.
At a height of, say, a thousand kilometers, it should be possible to see the whole earth as a round object (though maybe only a small fraction of the whole; greater altitude allows a greater picture). We see aircraft passing over the horizon from ground level, every day. It is hard to tell what you mean by "curvature of the earth." I have never spoken of it in connection with the lateral view of the horizon (though that does become more visibly curved with higher altitude). But it does arise from objects that pass over the horizon and are lost from view. In any case, we have flown around the earth and orbited around it, facts which you cannot disprove, so you need to get used to them.
Operation Fish Bowl - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkujMTSFr9o
NASA - https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf Page 12, many many more examples... But remember, we must take into account the Coriolis effect, haha, especially with the earth rotating at 1037mph, and orbiting the sun at 66,600 mph. 666! Many many many more government documents on "flat non-rotating earth".
What photographic evidence do you have that the earth is round? NASA CGI? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiYACfj94cc weather balloon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVupWWeroYc nuke hotspot vs sun hot spot
Gravity in space: https://t.me/covidemotions/2468 https://t.me/covidemotions/2599
Birds on mars: https://mars.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00688/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_458574869EDR_F0390444NCAM00295M_.JPG zoom in on the dot...
Bible verses: https://biblicalcosmologybook.blogspot.com/p/1500-flat-earth-verses.html
Amature Rocket into space: https://t.me/Nasa_Hoax/155 This link provides commentary https://t.me/Nasa_Hoax/10836
When something falls out of the horizon, just pick up a camera and zoom in, comes right back into view.
Develope a case in a few sentences versus a lifetime of brainwashing? Good luck with that.
This guy has a serious case of cognitive dissonance. I just argued with him for a week and he gave up when I told him to look up the definition of horizon and tell me where it mentions anything about earth curve. He thinks the moon missions were real lmao.
It is a shill, and a terrible one also.
Yes. That's the way it is with all exposures of reality. It doesn't take much. And you can't do it. Give me the photograph taken from the Empire State Building of the Eiffel Tower. Show me the photograph of the coast of Africa taken from the coast of Florida. Show me the photograph of Mt. Rainier taken from Hawaii. All it takes is a good telescope and a camera, if you are right---but you don't have any such proofs. They would be pathetically easy to accomplish, but you just don't have them, do you? You ought to think about that.
I also thought of something we haven't discussed: seismic determination of the structure of the Earth. We have a crust, beneath which is a mantle, under which is a core, divided into liquid and solid portions. We derive this picture from sound waves that travel throughout the inner earth to all regions of the world, so the data is compared and integrated. No flat earth results from all this.
We also haven't talked about the fact that it is impossible to accurately present large areas of the Earth on flat maps, because of the distortions resulting from flattening the spherical trigonometry into plane trigonometry. All the map projection systems are approximations, some better than others (the best being polyhedral projections). Why would this be the case, if the geometry is flat to begin with?
Atmosphere/air quality affects your viewing distance… need to think harder.
It’s alright to ignore all evidence presented to you. Cheers, blue pill wins.
Not going any more time with a shill.