Aubrey apparently believes she has right the to employee's personal medical information. The correct interpretation is this: Aubrey is evil AND stupid. She's also misinformed, but that's a minor detail.
threatening people into compliance is not evil. it is the basis of our entire justice system.
All of your ideas about the world are terrible.
Laws aren't threats, they're boundaries most people agree upon because it's for the good of everybody. Breaking them puts other people in danger so there are punishments for it.
I don't murder people because there's a law against it; it's morally and ethically wrong. There should be a punishment in place for transgressing that, which is why there is.
Some phony-baloney plandemic with a controversial "vaccine" doesn't give Aubrey the moral right or justification to threaten people with uncovering their medical records into compliance. She doesn't have that authority and there are laws in place specifically to prevent people from using information like that against employees. And this isn't the plague so "severity of threat" doesn't supersede law.
Stop justifying morally bankrupt threats with false equivalencies to how actual laws of justice work.
This right here is why we're in this situation. You try to be politically correct and give benefit of doubt while they actively fuck us in the ass. Stand up for yourself and others who can't defend themselves. Tell these people to shove it and we can rent this bullshit.
people like you are part of the problem. there is no grey area. you dont get to claim ignorance. if you're pushing this shot you're evil. whether thats out of ignorance or not, youre on the hook for supporting genocide. theres no way to wiggle out of that your logic does not stand.
Not sure why you're being downvoted. I'd say intent is a huge part of it all. Sheep blindly follow those they deem as experts. Blind, sure, stupid, absolutely, a pain in the ass, of course but evil, probably not. I think it's overreach to try to threaten to gain access to medical records though.
No sir. Malice is what implies intent. Evil is denoted by a lack of remorse for the consequences of one's actions.
A person with narcolepsy who falls asleep behind the wheel of a car and veers onto the sidewalk and kills a pedestrian, but is cleared of the charges, however bears no remorse because they view humanity as a parasite-- that person is evil.
Even if you did something without intent and it hurts someone, that does not render you evil. For accidents do happen and people forgive each other--specifically because of it being unintentional and the result of randomized chaos in the universe.
To be evil means to be aware of harm one did (whether accidentally or not) and yet feel no remorse for the consequences of their actions.
Kyle Rittenhouse acted to defend his life, and in doing so he took human lives. Although he intended to shoot those men to protect himself, and while not knowing they would die, he was aware that by shooting them the possibility was substantial.
And yet, even knowing he was forced to make such a difficult decision in choosing to defend his life at the cost of theirs, Kyle still showed great remorse at the consequences of his actions.
If Kyle did not feel remorse, and instead rejoiced in the situation and relished the possibility of future opportunities to lawfully shoot humans, then Kyle would be considered evil.
Aubrey apparently believes she has right the to employee's personal medical information. The correct interpretation is this: Aubrey is evil AND stupid. She's also misinformed, but that's a minor detail.
A person can be both.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Intent has absolutely nothing to do with whether you are evil or not.
Threatening people to get them to do what you want is evil.
This is why female managers suck.
She has no power so she uses force.
All of your ideas about the world are terrible.
Laws aren't threats, they're boundaries most people agree upon because it's for the good of everybody. Breaking them puts other people in danger so there are punishments for it.
I don't murder people because there's a law against it; it's morally and ethically wrong. There should be a punishment in place for transgressing that, which is why there is.
Some phony-baloney plandemic with a controversial "vaccine" doesn't give Aubrey the moral right or justification to threaten people with uncovering their medical records into compliance. She doesn't have that authority and there are laws in place specifically to prevent people from using information like that against employees. And this isn't the plague so "severity of threat" doesn't supersede law.
Stop justifying morally bankrupt threats with false equivalencies to how actual laws of justice work.
youre wrong. take the downvotes and criticism as a sign to reevaluate your retarded line of reasoning.
Are you laying pipe in Aubrey?
Our justice system is based on mutual respect.
I agree to follow those laws.
This bitch decided to make herself the law so she can get everyone to do what SHE wants.
She's evil. And you're evil for encouraging it.
Now that's some grade-A insane Leftist thinking right there.
"Oh, I didn't mean to murder all of those people! I just wanted to set the building on fire!"
"Oh, I didn't mean to steal all of these clothes, I just didn't have any money for them and wanted them."
"Oh, I didn't want to kill those people, I just wanted to rob a bank!"
Do you even think about the words you use to share your ideas?
People who are dangerously stupid, are evil. Evil does NOT define intent because people can be insane.
By their fruits you shall know them.
For lack of wisdom my people die.
This right here is why we're in this situation. You try to be politically correct and give benefit of doubt while they actively fuck us in the ass. Stand up for yourself and others who can't defend themselves. Tell these people to shove it and we can rent this bullshit.
I literally got a ban for this! Must be a full moon or something; gaw's gone savage. sshh, don't tell anybody its me.
My comment got deleted? What the hell is going on in this thread. I've said MUCH spicier shit.
people like you are part of the problem. there is no grey area. you dont get to claim ignorance. if you're pushing this shot you're evil. whether thats out of ignorance or not, youre on the hook for supporting genocide. theres no way to wiggle out of that your logic does not stand.
Not sure why you're being downvoted. I'd say intent is a huge part of it all. Sheep blindly follow those they deem as experts. Blind, sure, stupid, absolutely, a pain in the ass, of course but evil, probably not. I think it's overreach to try to threaten to gain access to medical records though.
No sir. Malice is what implies intent. Evil is denoted by a lack of remorse for the consequences of one's actions.
A person with narcolepsy who falls asleep behind the wheel of a car and veers onto the sidewalk and kills a pedestrian, but is cleared of the charges, however bears no remorse because they view humanity as a parasite-- that person is evil.
Even if you did something without intent and it hurts someone, that does not render you evil. For accidents do happen and people forgive each other--specifically because of it being unintentional and the result of randomized chaos in the universe.
To be evil means to be aware of harm one did (whether accidentally or not) and yet feel no remorse for the consequences of their actions.
Kyle Rittenhouse acted to defend his life, and in doing so he took human lives. Although he intended to shoot those men to protect himself, and while not knowing they would die, he was aware that by shooting them the possibility was substantial.
And yet, even knowing he was forced to make such a difficult decision in choosing to defend his life at the cost of theirs, Kyle still showed great remorse at the consequences of his actions.
If Kyle did not feel remorse, and instead rejoiced in the situation and relished the possibility of future opportunities to lawfully shoot humans, then Kyle would be considered evil.