I keep seeing the question: Why is Trump taking credit for a vax that is killing people?
We have heard many explanations, including...
- He's in on it.
- He doesn't know the truth.
- He had to do it so we weren't locked down for 5 year.
- There are no deaths--that's all fake news from White Hats and the shots are saline (I heard this one just the other day).
- He has to sound like he still approves of it otherwise the media crushes him.
- A combination of the above.
Personally, I have always thought #5 was the most plausible explanation.
But my new thought is this: whoever smelt it, dealt it. Remember that from junior high? Same principle. Imagine if Trump came out against the vax and he highlighted the adverse effects. What would happen? He would be blamed. But by pretending to still praise it (while advocating for you to do your own research and make your own choice), he allows the blame to remain squarely on the pharmas and other bad actors. And if they try to blame him, he can say "All I did was clear the path to speed up the process... you're the ones who created poison."
He had to speed it up so they couldn't keep us locked down. And until he is back in the White House (which I still believe will happen), he must play "stupid".
Yes, people are dying and being maimed. But until Trump is in power and able to stop it, he can't do anything else except what he is doing. I have siad this before: I think his heart breaks anew each day that goes by that he is notable to stop it.
Thanks for reading. Have at it, Frens.
"All I did was clear the path to speed up the process..."
And if this was his only repeated comment, I don't think anyone would have any issues with him saying that. In fact, saying that would support the belief that he rushed them out to stop the lockdowns in a much more compelling fashion than his ongoing promotion of the jabs.
True. But, in the various interviews if he doesn't go far enough with his words, then his lack of words/support becomes the story.
Call me an eternal optimist, but I just can't see Trump being evil. Sometimes less than gentlemanly with his behavior, of course. But not evil.
I didn't say he was evil and I'm only looking at what he says. The Alabama rally was not an interview, and all he had to do there was leave the jabs out of his speech.
Good point. So, new question: what's the chance that the vax is actually good (or just saline shots)... except for a handful of batches that were hijacked by the black hats??? I don't really think that. But, anything's possible at this point.
Can you think of any reason, or have you heard any Md worth their salt say, that suppressing a person's natural immune system is a "good thing"? Leaving them vulnerable not only to different kinds of coronaviruses, but also to formerly dormant diseases in their body like cancer? Look at all the toxic effects of spike proteins coursing through all jabbed peoples' bodies, crossing the blood/brain barrier, etc. This is the fundamental function of the mRNA technology in this "vaccine". Why would we have doctors and scientists saying the only conceivable purpose for this shot is a depopulation event?
Why would the entire DS/globalist cabal be going insane trying to jab every human being, down to infants, as fast as it can, for a "disease" that has a 99.9% survival rate? There is obviously a planned and adverse effect, or spectrum of effects, and it's highly likely that we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg so far.