Since you said you were inspired to write this after our conversation, I appreciate the time you took.
I think you feel that I do not understand the general premise of your beliefs. I feel like I do, at least in some sense.
What I'm having trouble doing is translating it into a practical translation of what we're seeing. I'm having trouble making specific, verifiable predictions, rather than generalized predictions. It feels more religious than anything. Which doesn't make it wrong, but makes it faith-based rather than empirical.
You suggest that your predictions (extrapolated from Q's) will come true, and I can accept that. But what I'm trying to do is translate what we actually see into how they fit into the generalized predictions of Q's eventual victory, specifically with the vaccines.
The original conversation we had asked this question, so I guess I'll ask again and see how we can apply what you wrote.
Let's assume the Plan is going cleanly, and Donald Trump always intended to "leave" office. This was always planned and things are going to plan.
Trump knows the Cabal is planning a "forever lockdown." He knows this will fail, because the Plan guarantees it. There is no possible way the Cabal will survive the next few years, according to the Plan.
If all that is true, what is the point of forcing the vaccine? What benefit does releasing the vaccine actually offer, if the Plan guaranteed the Cabal will fall anyway? The vaccine isn't just targeting the embedded Deep State agents, it's indiscriminate.
So why is the damage being done by the vaccine a necessary part of the Plan if the Cabal was already guaranteed to fall, and never could have enforced a forever lockdown anyway, because Trump was always destined to return? What part of your post explains that?
I just have a really hard time seeing how using a massacre disguised as a medication and endorsed by both sides of the mainstream political spectrum as trustworthy is considered a good guy plan, especially since the vast majority of deaths are innocent people that the good guys are supposed to be protecting. Including vaccinated children.
Sorry, I hit a busy patch at work. I’ve read through what you wrote and started on a response but never had the chance to finish. I will update when I’m able.
Hi Zeitreise,
Since you said you were inspired to write this after our conversation, I appreciate the time you took.
I think you feel that I do not understand the general premise of your beliefs. I feel like I do, at least in some sense.
What I'm having trouble doing is translating it into a practical translation of what we're seeing. I'm having trouble making specific, verifiable predictions, rather than generalized predictions. It feels more religious than anything. Which doesn't make it wrong, but makes it faith-based rather than empirical.
You suggest that your predictions (extrapolated from Q's) will come true, and I can accept that. But what I'm trying to do is translate what we actually see into how they fit into the generalized predictions of Q's eventual victory, specifically with the vaccines.
The original conversation we had asked this question, so I guess I'll ask again and see how we can apply what you wrote.
Let's assume the Plan is going cleanly, and Donald Trump always intended to "leave" office. This was always planned and things are going to plan.
Trump knows the Cabal is planning a "forever lockdown." He knows this will fail, because the Plan guarantees it. There is no possible way the Cabal will survive the next few years, according to the Plan.
If all that is true, what is the point of forcing the vaccine? What benefit does releasing the vaccine actually offer, if the Plan guaranteed the Cabal will fall anyway? The vaccine isn't just targeting the embedded Deep State agents, it's indiscriminate.
So why is the damage being done by the vaccine a necessary part of the Plan if the Cabal was already guaranteed to fall, and never could have enforced a forever lockdown anyway, because Trump was always destined to return? What part of your post explains that?
I just have a really hard time seeing how using a massacre disguised as a medication and endorsed by both sides of the mainstream political spectrum as trustworthy is considered a good guy plan, especially since the vast majority of deaths are innocent people that the good guys are supposed to be protecting. Including vaccinated children.
Sorry, I hit a busy patch at work. I’ve read through what you wrote and started on a response but never had the chance to finish. I will update when I’m able.