Roberts is lost to the dark side. Expect nothing from him except for betrayal of conservatism and the Constitution. I'd like to demand that he show us that part of the Constitution that specifically enumerates the right to an abortion. But he will never answer that question directly... if he answered at all it would be the most convoluted leap of logic and word salad in search of a cogent thought.
William Buckeley once said that some ideas are so ridiculous that only an intellectual could believe them. Case in point, Justice Roberts.
This is where it is easy to tell that someone is out of his depth. "His dimwit son"? GW Bush was an F-102 pilot. There is no way to be a dimwit and survive flying that plane. He wasn't a dimwit, but he was wrong in many things. You don't get to look down on his intelligence simply because he was wrong.
Roberts is lost to the dark side. Expect nothing from him except for betrayal of conservatism and the Constitution. I'd like to demand that he show us that part of the Constitution that specifically enumerates the right to an abortion. But he will never answer that question directly... if he answered at all it would be the most convoluted leap of logic and word salad in search of a cogent thought.
William Buckeley once said that some ideas are so ridiculous that only an intellectual could believe them. Case in point, Justice Roberts.
This is where it is easy to tell that someone is out of his depth. "His dimwit son"? GW Bush was an F-102 pilot. There is no way to be a dimwit and survive flying that plane. He wasn't a dimwit, but he was wrong in many things. You don't get to look down on his intelligence simply because he was wrong.