Due to his earlier research with colleagues at UF, Ostrov already knew diphenhydramine was potentially effective against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The latest discovery has its roots in a routine meeting of scientists with the Global Virus Network’s COVID-19 task force. One researcher presented unpublished data on federally approved compounds that inhibit SARS-CoV-2 activity, including lactoferrin.
Like diphenhydramine, lactoferrin is available without a prescription. Ostrov thought about pairing it with diphenhydramine and ran with the idea. In lab tests on human and monkey cells, the combination was particularly potent: Individually, the two compounds each inhibited SARS-CoV-2 virus replication by about 30%. Together, they reduced virus replication by 99%.
99% reduced replication. Your natural immune system can handle the leftovers (If you still have the immune system that God gave you and not the new one that the clot-shot reprograms yours to.)
Let that sink in. 99% Antihistamine + Milk Protein
Link to the scientific paper published in the Journal; Pathogens
This does NOT prove anything.
This was an in vitro lab test on cells, not on a human.
If the substances they put on the cells were things that counteract the antibiotics that are ALWAYS put on such cells when studying "viruses" (and the antibiotics are what cause the cellular destruction that are falsely labeled "viruses"), then it would be logical if there was less cellular destruction.
I don't know if that's what happened here, but milk protein helped reduce the cellular destrution (and proteins might possibly do that). Likewise, antihistamines might also reduce the cellular breakdown in the lab.
The fact that this "scientist" is pretending to work on the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is NOT isolated in any laboratory anywhere in the world, should be clue #1 that this research is suspect.
People on the GAW that are STILL unaware of Terrain Theory vs. Germ Theory, and unware of how virologists pretend to study viruses, are WAAAAY behind in their awakening, and will be easily fooled by this type of stuff.
Okay so what solution to this madness do you recommend?
First, do not skip past the evidence and pretend it does not exist. IOW, do not ignore what I wrote. Either agree or refute it.
Second, do you see how the paper posted by OP does not prove anything?
If you don't "get it" then there is no point in going beyond that until you do, because that is necessary to understand before jumping to the subject of possible solutions.
First, i'm not skipping past evidence. i just don't know exactly what is and isn't true re: Covid. i see conflicting reports from (seemingly patriot) medical professionals all the time.
Second, yes i see how it doesn't "prove" anything, but i've also seen the same argument re: Ivermectin etc.
so that's where i am.