INTRODUCING! The official GAW Holiday "Kid's Table!" Who's sitting there this holiday season? All the little children who aren't big enough to sit at the adult's table, yet! 😁
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (150)
sorted by:
It all depends whether the vax is the death shot. If it is the death shot, I don't care what side Trump is on, he is killing people. If it isn't the death shot he can play all the 4 d chess he wants good for him.
So what if it is and he didn't know?
Personally, as long as he is against mandates and champions freedom of choice, I don't care. i didn't take medical advice from celebrities before, and i am not going to suddenly start now.
Yeah, we don't take advice from celebrities but when Joe Rogan, Aaaron Rogers and Tom Brady appear to be on our side we sure push the info. It is nice to have someone in your corner.
I agree with you to an extent, but if it is the death shot and he wants credit for it, it doesn't matter if he didn't know, IMO. De Blasio can say he didn't know as he coerces his city to get the jab.
So far nobody in the US has been physically forced to take the jab, only coerced.
That is true. My theory is that the shot itself is not the death shot. I arrived at the hypothesis in part because Trump encourages a personal choice to receive it, and that he had a large part in the rushing forth of this shot in a trial basis. Trump has shown no other evidence of nefererious purposes, so I will trust him on this one also. I also note that most of my circle has gotten it (not me, I don't need it), and nothing has happened to any of them. Now, I do believe that there is a whole lot of nefarious activity around the vaccination program in that the Globalists hope to use a vaccine mandate and public pressure to establish an infrastructure for control and future delivery of kill shots or controlling nanotech, as well as "papers".
Makes sense, I am hopeful it is not the death shot, I have many friends and family that have taken it.
We agree, if it is not the death shot, the biggest issue with it is the way globalists are using it to control the herd.
I lean toward it is not the death shot, but not fully convinced at this point. I do find it strange how many soccer players have dropped on the field of play. But, we haven't seen it in US professional sports, so we will see.
I think we are seeing experimental levels of side effects as might occur with many medical human trials, coupled with a huge number of human trial "participants". Human trials occur in the thousands. This experimental vaccine has a human trial in the hundreds of millions worldwide.
How do you explain the explosion in vaccine related deaths and health issues? Do you just think all of these doctors are wrong about the danger of the vaccine? Curious.
This was never about the "death" shot. A side effect is of course a generally less healthy public (and some amount of deaths that would have never previously been accept for a "vaccine") but they were never going to mass exterminate people. Rather, they poison every single aspect of our lives: food, water, entertainment, medicine, etc. until everyone is suffering from multiple chronic health conditions.
The depopulation agenda is pushed more so by making motherhood unappealing to women and making having kids prohibitively expensive and that's working like a charm considering the basically the entire western world has birth rates below replacement level at this point.
What this is really about is the social control through fear, coercion, and restriction on movement. Since he doesn't speak out about this issue, I no longer support him.
I hope you are right. I lean toward your thinking,but leave open the ADE potential of the shot.
I feel they are pushing it so forcefully, b/c if 90%+ take it, they can institute the vax passport nationwide and push for more and more control of the people.
There is gonna be ADE and appears to already be hundreds of thousands of deaths. But the main purpose is the passports.
Except the motherhood unattractive argument is null..women are becoming mothers younger and younger even if they are low iq, low info, immature people.
Have you seen mom tiktok? The traffic YouTubers get when announcing pregnancy and doing mommy vlog content? The money instagrammers make with pregnancy/motherhood content? The rising of "breeding fetishes" and expansion of preggo porn? Hell, there's a preggoporn Reddit board that gets more submissions than gonewIld
Motherhood is not discouraged and social media is the new weapon of the baby industry.
When we were born, strollers were $20 and you did formula or breast fed
Now we have $1500 strollers, $500 milk pumpers, and full on luxury designer clothes for babies.
Your metric is social media, porn, and consumerism. My metric is birth rates. Which do you think actually matters when it comes to projecting future population size?
what I mean is even libtard media is glorifying it
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/apr/11/growing-up-fast-why-parenting-in-your-20s-is-the-new-punk
I think you will see the trends shifting heavily in reverse very soob
Are you informed about Agenda 2030?
Obviously.