Ladies and gentlemen, the MSM via Forbes is trying to get ahead of the "DNA modification" story and they've had to "modify" their own article to boot! Our high-school biology taught us RNA can modify DNA, and we were right (conspiracy theory becomes fact while you wait)! Read the URL name of this article and then note that the actual headline has been changed:
The headline is now "Covid Vaccines Don’t Alter Your DNA – They Help Choose Cells To Strengthen Your Immune Response". Here is the first draft captured by Archive. Author Steven Salzberg tweeted at first, "Yes, the vaccine does change your DNA, but only indirectly, as I try to explain in my latest Forbes piece here," linking to an even earlier version that contains the phrase "'Changes your DNA.' Actually, it does, but not in the way they think." (Tweet 1465299579516170252 by stevensalzberg1.)
The substitution was noted by Resistance Mondiale. I haven't found the earliest version containing that offending sentence but it got my attention by coming up in the Google gloss; it appears that Salzberg demoted the sublead to the first graf and then changed the second sentence to the generic "Oh, the horrors!" However, the original sentence is still visible in his profile page (archive)!
The new article still admits CDC isn't telling the full story, but adds the new lie (i.e. redefinition), so watch the shell game carefully. The fact is that ordinary viruses, and the modRNA injection, both modify DNA in lymphocytes (a subset of white blood cells, primarily T-cells and B-cells). The original article admits the truth, "The DNA in these ... cells is ... different because of the vaccine." The revised article drops all this language and instead provides the new lie straight from the mouth of the anonymous authority: "To be more precise, as an immunologist colleague explained to me: the vaccine doesn’t change any DNA, even in your immune cells, but it causes the proliferation of certain immune cells that have have [sic] already undergone genetic rearrangement." This refers to the lymphocytes. But it's a lie; the technical name for the process is somatic hypermutation by antigen stimulation, which happens during proliferation, and yes it changes your DNA. (I'm not sure whether the power of reverse transcription to change DNA is also relevant.)
In other words, the cabal claims the injection doesn't change DNA because what it does change was originally DNA but had already been changed before by natural processes and so doesn't count as DNA. A quick check says that 80% of human cells are blood, 1% of these are white blood cells, and 18%-42% of these are lymphocytes, which are 93% B- and T-cells. This means the injection (like a natural virus) has the potential when activated to change DNA in 1 in every 400 cells in your body, hundreds of billions of lymphocytes. (Feel free to correct me.) This is marginalized in the original article as "But T-cells are just a tiny, tiny portion of your body." But the barn door is open and the cows are loose.
TLDR: The injections, like natural viruses, do modify DNA in lymphocytes, potentially up to 1 in 400 cells in the human body. This is important because all "vaccine deaths", including myocarditis, are now being tracked to lymphocyte failure by Dr. Malone. Forbes admitted "the CDC got it wrong" by neglecting this fact. However, the article was quickly changed to show the new narrative: lymphocyte DNA doesn't count as DNA anymore because those DNA strands "have have already undergone genetic rearrangement." But before last month everyone called them DNA too, and Wikipedia on "somatic hypermutation" still does.
Interestingly, the anon probably also told Steven to change T to B in the revision as more accurate, for which he explained, "It's complicated". Now this gets me thinking about how lies are covered for in general. One might briefly pretend to agree with the truth so as to substitute a new lie. The change-up is often accompanied by inexactitudes so that the change from the truth to the new lie can be defended as a correcting improvement. Thus when Steven is asked why he corrected the article the rationale is that it said T when it meant B, deflecting people away from the real reason (new poison). Further, anyone like me searching for the data might see a form of the old version (the fnord), but then is redirected to the new version with the breathless assurance that, yes, we were right all along and here's the new reason why the conspiracy theorists are still nuts. If you want to read comms into the situation, consider that Salzberg's next article was "DNA is safe to eat"! Eating his words?
B can stand for bone marrow (or bursa), and T for thymus. Now you know why Obama bought dozens of aborted fetuses so that he (his FDA) could attach their livers and thymuses to "BLT mice"; Trump abolished this. The immunity research into cytokine storms was connected to the gain of function research. Note that the title of our important related article is slightly incorrect. Correction: I meant this higher-visibility article.
Digression: Compare how the forces of evil shifted the narrative in The Last Battle by C. S. Lewis (one of them even named Shift). When the Narnians discovered that the liars (inspired by Tash, who fills in for both Satan and Muslim Allah) had counterfeited the appearance of Aslan the true king, they removed the ability to keep counterfeiting (the lionskin). The liars immediately proclaimed they themselves had discovered that a counterfeit Aslan was circulating and could not be trusted, but that they continued to host the true Aslan, to counteract the brilliant soldiery of the Narnians. The same thing happened in reality while The Book of Mormon was being written (1827-1829). When the first 116 pages of it were lost, Joseph Smith was distraught because he had claimed they were translation and he knew an enemy might compare them prejudicially to any second "translation" he might attempt. Then he said he was told by an angel that his alleged golden plates for translation actually had two variations of the same narrative, that he could just translate from the other copy instead because it was better, and that the lost manuscript would be changed by the Lord since it might have been used in an attempt to disprove the validity of his translation (this is standard CoJCoLDS admitted history). In all three of these cases, it's no longer about truth, it's about the perceived piety of some greater good than truth existing that is capable of defeating its incorruptible power. And don't get me started about Chester Arthur's rise to the presidency. Solzhenitsyn said it: "One word of truth outweighs the world."
Thanks also to a very important discovery by u/cosmicspiritwarrior of NIH description of the vaccine injection structure, which got me started on this. Please read that article to see the many things admittedly added to modRNA to make it more infective, and yet they still misleadingly call it "mRNA vaccine", another big lie.
And please disseminate the TLDR talking points far and wide, as they settle the issue of truth about DNA modification and will be more important as the Malone lymph discoveries develop!
Excellent reporting, Swampy :)