Oh dear...
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
How is it any different then petrol/diesel based cars? Far easier for a citizen to get their own source of electricity then for them to manufacture their own fuel. (Crude oil > cracking tower > catalysts, refining and additives) as opposed to solar/wind for individual use, small transformer, possiblly battery and a compatible charger. I suppose biodiesel is an option but even that requires a compatible/speacilised engine
So you have your own solar or wind and set it up to charge your vehicle. That will get you what 300 miles? 150 miles then back home. Citizens are not to be limited to that range.
We already have the infrastructure for gasoline and diesel. We do not have the infrastructure for all vehicles to require electric charging. Of course fuel pumps run on electricity, but a station could I suppose run those pumps on a generator, given that they have the fuel.
Sad we even have to contemplate the powers to be might shut off our means of transportation . . .
Fuel supply chain is a constant need. Fuel becomes defunct after about 3 months. Without constant drilling and refining we w Ont be able to supply enough. Government needs to put one stop in the fears and petroleum is dead to the citizens. I'd prefer petroleum in a perfect society, but in one where gov can and will clamp down on me, I want one I can fuel myself and preferably cut back on all the useless tech that just tracks you and makes your car hackable.
In the day [18th century for sure], even city dwellers had a cow and a horse in the back of their town lot. [There were common pastures]. We may all need to take up the Amish lifestyle. There aren't enough horses, though . . . unless all preppers get a horse and the demand steps up the supply . . .