I just got hit with this BS tonight about a conference call tm morning following up with her exemption. They’re digging in deep to her religious exemption, they’re going to ask her in-depth info about what she knows and why. Could you guys drop some links below relating to the following:
Vaers data spreadsheet
CDC cutting ties with PCR test
Inventor of PCR test saying not to use it
Bible verses relating to the beast and not taking unnecessary risks to endanger your well being
I’m only crowdsourcing this because time is of the essence! Thanks for your help I appreciate any feedback.
She ain’t taking that shit and if she loses her job then so be it. We are fighting this tooth and nail. (I guess she should have listened to me during all my frustrated rants over the past year because she would have this shit memorized 😁
It is better to get away from such an employer, but if you really want an answer on how she can keep her job:
"The COVID vaccines conflict with my sincerely-held religious beliefs."
Repeat that for every question. It satisfies the legal language requirement to qualify for an exemption. Anything beyond that opens the door for them to argue against your religious beliefs.
This. No means no. One does not need to explain a religious stance. It is a right that they cannot take away.
Additionally, you can make it clear that you are not "requesting" religious exemption; you're declaring it.
This line of questioning opens them up to a discrimination case. Take notes and go see a lawyer.
In legal terms, you have to request "reasonable accommodation" be made. The company can determine no reasonable course for accommodation is possible. For example, a wheelchair-bound person can have their request for an elevator denied if the elevator would bankrupt the company. There is no burden like that for COVID which doesn't also exist for vaccinated, but they will still try to find a loophole to avoid accommodating people.
Hold on. ... an employer now is trying to become judge and jury on matters of faith?
And this is what you guys are going to accept as an ok position?
turn the issue around: if they feel they are athorized to mandate anything, let them proof according to the Koch Postulates:
Since there is no proof of this, all they have is that the vaxx IS MODE OF TRANSMISSION FOR THE VIRUS.
Growing from a disease of compliance without knowledge.
And if they want to continue, let them fire your wife. Then sue the hell out of them, including their persons.
I appreciate the response, I’m in agreement with you. As I said if she loses her job… then so be it. It’s going to hurt a little. But she’s not compromising with weekly testing, jabs, etc. the company will do what the company will do no matter what amount of information and legal threats are tossed in their direction. She’s very smart and is getting everything in writing including follow up questions.
There is little recourse CURRENTLY for mid-level employees of a massive corporation. Part of our mutual feeling is that it might be best for us (for her to be terminated) because we have an 11 month old and her job is stressing our marriage and we don’t want it to affect her ability to be a mother.
I’m looking at it as a blessing in disguise because it’s forcing a decision which is why we are just exhausting all options and responses to compile evidence for a future class-action or individual civil suit.
Interested to hear your feedback
That sure sounds like an advantageous position. Kudos for obtaining everything in writing.
An indeed, it is better to first move pieces around before the final battle, but you know already that it will be positive for you both. By the looks of it: the right choice.
Love the way you are approaching it!
Thanks brotha!
INVOKE religious exemption. not is your right. Watch Peggy Hall's video on it ( 20 min) on YouTube
It may cause neurodegenerative diseases https://nationalfile.com/report-pfizer-vaccine-confirmed-to-cause-neurodegenerative-diseases/
Data show that deaths are rising post-vaccination http://archive.today/M9WIB
It's not effective. - The Lancet https://archive.is/J1NJa
Tinventor of mRNA vaccines believes that they are causing variants https://mobile.twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1420408910268223489 https://archive.is/P1UXm
CDC: vaccine no longer prevents transmission (it never did!) https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/08/06/cdc_director_vaccines_no_longer_prevent_you_from_spreading_covid.html
Huge resource of vaccine data and links http://archive.today/mWELR
"Researchers claim that an effective and approved SARS vaccine takes three to five years to produce." (2011) http://archive.today/OnQM3
Here's the WHO adverse event database. Use search term "covid-19 vaccine" http://vigiaccess.org/
And there's this thing that I lifted from this website.
Question: Were the PCR/antigen tests created with, or tested on, aborted fetal tissue at any point in their development or initial use?
Answer: Yes. Aborted fetal tissue was used via derivative/secondary testing. Anyone who has submitted religious accommodations (RAs) about aborted fetal tissue CAN use their pending (or existing) RA as a way to not get the weekly tests done. There is plenty more info out there than the below links, but these demonstrate that all of the below products are tainted.
Rhetorical question: Is it worse to murder a baby and then eat it directly, or to cook it into something and then eat that? Or are they the same?
I won't use Tamiflu (Oseltamivir) because it was developed using aborted fetal cell lines... so... why would I use PCR/antigen tests that were tested on Tamiflu (Oseltamivir) during their respective production processes to ensure they work?
Derivative testing applies. Secondary testing is still testing using cells. It doesn't matter how far removed it seems.
The below tests were all developed in reliance on aborted fetal tissue. InBios Smart Detect SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR Kit https://www.fda.gov/media/136786/download Page 4 It used HEK-293 cells in buffer.
Tamiflu (Oseltamivir) was literally developed by using MRC-5, etc, cells. page 12 (page 13 of the actual PDF file): https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/99/21087_Tamiflu_micror_admincorres.pdf
The following PCR/Antigen tests were developed via testing on Tamiflu (Oseltamivir): QuickVue At-Home https://www.fda.gov/media/146312/download Page 12 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
InteliSwab https://www.fda.gov/media/149911/download Page 9 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
BinaxNow https://www.fda.gov/media/141570/download Page 13 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
Simoa SARS-CoV-2 N Protein Antigen Test https://www.fda.gov/media/144929/download Page 8 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Test SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Self-Test (InBios) https://www.fda.gov/media/148353/download Page 13 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
Celltrion DiaTrust COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Celltrion DiaTrust COVID-19 Ag Home Test https://www.fda.gov/media/147694/download Page 12 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
QIAreach SARS-CoV-2 Antigen https://www.fda.gov/media/151383/download Page 46 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Ag https://www.fda.gov/media/147311/download Page 7 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
ellume.lab COVID Antigen Test https://www.fda.gov/media/150687/download Page 8 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
GenBody COVID-19 Ag https://www.fda.gov/media/150788/download Page 11 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
Nano-Check COVID-19 Antigen Test https://www.fda.gov/media/154718/download Page 6 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Reagent Pack https://www.fda.gov/media/145073/download Page 13 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
INDICAID COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test https://www.fda.gov/media/151215/download Page 21 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test https://www.lumiradx.com/assets/pdfs/covid-19-antigen-test/sars-cov-2-antigen-product-insert/sars-cov-2-ag-test-strip-product-insert-eua.pdf?v=6 Page 2 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
NIDS COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Kit https://www.fda.gov/media/152464/download Page 14 Says it was tested on Tamiflu
SPERA COVID-19 Ag Test insert https://www.fda.gov/media/153096/download Page 17 Says it was tested on Tamiflu
Flowflex COVID-19 Antigen Home Test https://www.fda.gov/media/152698/download Page 2 Says it was tested on Tamiflu
Status COVID-19/Flu A&B https://www.fda.gov/media/145697/download Page 24 Says it was tested on Oseltamivir
BD Veritor At-Home COVID-19 Test https://www.fda.gov/media/151761/download Page 18 Says it was tested on Tamiflu
iHealth COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test https://www.fda.gov/media/153923/download Page 16 Says it was tested on Tamiflu
CareStart COVID-19 Antigen Home Test CareStart COVID-19 Antigen test https://www.fda.gov/media/151248/download Page 15 Says it was tested on Tamiflu
Thanks so much for the effort in this comment, you’re a true autist ;) I appreciate the love
You're welcome. I've been hoarding info since March 2020. I'm still not satisfied with the quality and depth of content, but I'm glad I was able to post something useful.
Read this and follow up article:
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-coffee-and-covid-monday-october-4e1
Thanks for the sauce
pCR info --- https://fort-russ.com/2021/11/the-who-confirms-that-the-covid-19-pcr-test-is-flawed-estimates-of-positive-cases-are-meaningless-the-lockdown-has-no-scientific-basis/
Kary Mullins video rE: pcr testing. (he died before Covid 19 so he didn't directly discuss covid.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXm9kAhNj-4
Personally, I think religious exemption is unnecessary as your inalienable rights are guaranteed by the Constitution, but it seems you've already proposed that as her out, so I wish you good luck and even if she does lose her job, there are plenty more out there right now. Good luck.