I don't see these subpoenas as a bombshell if they are to testify before a house committee consisting of anti Trump democrats and two turncoat republicans. Testimony is shaped by questions and you will not get an honest question from anyone on this committee.
That was my first thought, too. But his is not issued by the house unselect committee. This subpoena is issued by the defense team of an oathkeeper who is currently being prosecuted by the feds for allegedly inciting violence at the Jan 6 rally. Check the article for more details. Looks like good news to me.
I know not to comment without reading the article but failed to do so this time. Thanks for doing what I should have done and bringing the information to this forum. Having now read the article, I agree with you in that this could very well be good news.
I don't see these subpoenas as a bombshell if they are to testify before a house committee consisting of anti Trump democrats and two turncoat republicans. Testimony is shaped by questions and you will not get an honest question from anyone on this committee.
That was my first thought, too. But his is not issued by the house unselect committee. This subpoena is issued by the defense team of an oathkeeper who is currently being prosecuted by the feds for allegedly inciting violence at the Jan 6 rally. Check the article for more details. Looks like good news to me.
I know not to comment without reading the article but failed to do so this time. Thanks for doing what I should have done and bringing the information to this forum. Having now read the article, I agree with you in that this could very well be good news.
It happens. At least it wasn't stuck halfway through a 45-minute video!