I am very concerned about everyone in WA, I saw this tyranny evolving and left my home state, and of course they decide these things after a huge storm has most of the state snowed in.
What is interesting is that they made reference to the ESHB 1551 ruling form 2020 regarding STD's- naming mostly HIV. If they can push the argument that CVD!9 is an STD then they may apply the same ruling, but thats a stretch and hardly as believable as Prince Andrew's sweat.
I am very concerned about everyone in WA, I saw this tyranny evolving and left my home state, and of course they decide these things after a huge storm has most of the state snowed in.
So whats next? You can find out what they have decided. I looked at the meeting notes, https://sboh.wa.gov/Meetings/MeetingInformation/2022/January12Online ,
Good on those who got their public comments in, see some here ----> https://sboh.wa.gov/Portals/7/Doc/Meetings/2022/Jan%2012/Tab06a-PublicComment-compressed.pdf?ver=2022-01-07-183703-883
Praying for all family friends and everyone who call WA state home!
I have not found the discussion of the above mentioned WAC however their CVD19 presentation is still pending.
Of course they try to get ahead of the dissent, by posting a clarification. you can read that here https://sboh.wa.gov/News/Articles/ID/3050/Clarifying-Online-Misinformation-about-the-Jan-12-State-Board-of-Health-Public-Meeting
What is interesting is that they made reference to the ESHB 1551 ruling form 2020 regarding STD's- naming mostly HIV. If they can push the argument that CVD!9 is an STD then they may apply the same ruling, but thats a stretch and hardly as believable as Prince Andrew's sweat.