546
Never Before... (media.greatawakening.win) 🌎 WWG1WGAWW 🌍
posted ago by purkiss80 ago by purkiss80 +547 / -1
Comments (50)
sorted by:
26
hundro 26 points ago +26 / -0

You put into words something that has been blowing my mind for weeks. Maybe I'm NOT insane?

20
UltimateMastermind 20 points ago +20 / -0

That redpill moment when you are looking around yourself in disbelief how everyone is buying plain lie. You are trying to tell people the truth or atleast point out some things are lies and they look at your face like wtf happened to you. Your fabric of reality is shattered. You spend couple of weeks or months searching for another glitch in matrix questioning your sanity. Ahh, great times.. not. :D

8
KickingPugilist 8 points ago +8 / -0

Reminds me of that pic with everyone wearing VR and Zuckerberg is smiling in the real world among the virtuals.

3
cyberrigger 3 points ago +3 / -0

You could be iPhone and they could Android.

Completely alternate realities.....

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

Transhumanism (a suggested belief system) aims to exchange 1 (perceived reality) with 0 (suggested fiction).

As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one perceives inspiration (from within spirit); while being tempted to ignore it for suggested information (from within form) by others. Resisting that temptation represents forms resistance to the velocity of flow for temporary growth potential (form) within ongoing loss of potentiality (flow).

3
PhDinNY 3 points ago +3 / -0

And you know if we were to calmly explain all that is going on, in public, people would think we are the crazy ones!

3
spiggot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just had a friend lose it at me today because I'm unvaxxed.

He says he's got two family members in hospital with COVID right now and it's all the fault of the unvaxxed conspiracy theorists who are selfish for not taking the vaccine.

Of course, both his family members in hospital are vaccinated and recently had their boosters, but somehow it's the fault of the unvaxxed.

This is a smart guy who really should be able to understand what's going on or at least put 2 and 2 together and start asking questions. Also, he's proud of recently getting his 2 young children vaccinated. Breaks my heart.

It truly is mass formation psychosis. At this stage I'm not sure if he'll ever admit he was wrong, even if Lord Fauci himself came out and admitted that the vaccines don't work and that mass depopulation was their goal all along. He's just too far gone, I fear.

1
Deplorabledave1957 1 point ago +1 / -0

My story also ! Some days I feel like dropping to my knees & crying.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe I'm NOT insane?

Insane (in sanus aka within sound) + Person (per sonos aka by sound). Therefore; you represent the choice based response to being within perceivable sound (insane). On the other hand...nothing (NOT) cannot exist within everything. One cannot perceive nothingness; since perception implies in response to everything.

3
Flowers_for_Alger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not insane-just a different pair of glasses on your head:-)

9
TheHumanPrimer 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well to be fair, I think that accurately describes my entire first marriage.

6
patriot68 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've been saying for a long time that the people you meet could be living in any of a dozen entirely separate reality bubbles. This is a direct result of the intentionally confused and contradictory information we receive from various news outlets. It's divide and conquer on a mass mind control level. Just ask someone whether they believe the virus was man-made or natural, and if man-made was it intentionally or accidentally leaked? The realities that stem from those three conditions are entirely separate realities that a person may believe in. These basic level beliefs form the foundation of the reality they're living in. And that's just the question of the origin of the virus. You might ask the person next, do you believe the cable news networks always tell the truth, perhaps sometimes accidentally lie, or do they lie continuously and intentionally? Those are three separate realities that a person may be living in again. These basic level beliefs are foundational beliefs and are very hard to change. Another person will not be able to change a foundational belief held by someone else. We may as well be living on 12 different planets. They are truly separate realities existing in the same space at the same time.

2
mengderen 2 points ago +2 / -0

The 20th Century is filled with global alternate realities: Czarist Russia> Soviet Union. Chinese Emperor >Mao's China, Prussian Reich>Nazi Germany. U.S. Depression>FDR's New Deal.. In each case, there was a rise and fall as each one failed. The cost??? millions and millions of lives-we just have to find a better way to remember HISTORY...

2
PhDinNY 2 points ago +2 / -0

And Johnson's "Great Society", which seemed to have a good chance of getting snuffed out back during the "Contract With America" days, but has quietly crept back even bigger.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

to remember HISTORY...

a) question why suggested his-story always leaves out the main (re)actor of ALL reality...ONEself?

b) remember implies response to memory...what if the conscious memory needs to used like a ram (temporary storage of information for constant adaptation to perceived inspiration, and not like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information until capacity)?

c) what if one can be tricked to ignore that which is (reality) for memories of that which was (fiction) by simply suggesting it aka nostalgia; his-story; captured moments (pictures); motion pictures aka 0 (suggested information) over 1 (perceived inspiration)?

1
mengderen 1 point ago +1 / -0

a. at 76 YO, I remember all kinds of shit from the 50s on; b. memory is also contained in books TBS it must be an impartial rendering of actual events; c. We are going to have to have faith based society (in God) where 'just the facts, maam' is a guiding principle. Any revisions should not be based on one editor.

I know, I'm still an idealist and Lord knows humans are so far from perfection that they are mere confection upon this planet..

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

I remember all kinds of shit from the 50s on

If you remember the birth of your son while standing next to him; that implies ignoring that which is (your son) for that which isn't (his birth) aka ignoring perceived reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information). Ask yourself why would you remember (respond to memory) instead of responding to whatever your son inspires you to respond to? This represents ones choice of want (temptation) over need (response ability).

You even call it "all kinds of shit; when referring to the information you consent to store within your conscious memory. It is also that information we consent to pollute our memory with that causes the ego; the internal monologue based on upheld information; while ignoring to adapt to ongoing inspiration.

This is why the parasitic few represent "happy merchants" aka those who suggest temptation for the price of consent.

memory is also contained in books

All suggested information; all words shaped by the choice of others out of perceived inspiration to suggested those who consent to it to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information.

Nature doesn't need to be unlocked and stored as information; each ONE within ALL needs to grow ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived. This is about your growth; not about collectively wasting our existence to rebuild the "Library of Alexandria" and the "Tower of Babel" over and over again.

A world of lies represents the response to a world that ignores perceived change (inspiration) for suggested truth (information)...only if the many consent to the affixed (information); while ignoring the ongoing (inspiration) can they few contradict (lie) the suggested (truth) at will.

an impartial rendering of actual events

Two tests for this...a) the game Telephone; Chinese whispers; Stille Post...make a line out of a group; whisper information to the first and let them whisper it to each other until you get a completely different information at the end. Why? Because choice can shape suggested information at will and the temptation to do so (whispering) will always corrupt suggested information. Why is that? Because choosing want (information) over need (inspiration) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies ignoring self sustenance of choice within balance (need/want) for the suggested choices of others (want vs not want) aka imbalance through ignorance of balance.

b) a goal at a soccer game...afterwards ask the shooter; the goalie; the players; the trainers and the onlookers about what just happened and they will each suggest a different understanding of the same perceived event. Why? Because flow (ALL) differentiates itself into individual form (ONEs) to be able to communicate inspiration to each ONE as to get them to respond to balance for self sustenance. If everything percieved would be the same; then what would inspire form to struggle for sustenance within the momentum of flow? Hence the need for differentiation; hence us each representing a different ONE (comprehension) out of the same ALL (perception) aka temporary growth potential out of ongoing loss of potentiality.

In short...the many are being deceived to ignore that they each perceive the same; yet understand it differently. Growing this comprehension is being done by choice based adaptation to perceived (inspiration)...not by consent to suggested (information).

If we are within motion; I cannot use affixed words to suggest the meaning of ongoing motion to you; without tempting you to ignore perceived (reality) for suggested (fiction); which afterwards would give me the power to control through my suggested meaning (fiction) your understanding of perceived meaning (reality).

How is it that every other life-form can perceive; adapt to and comprehend "grass" without anyone telling them that it's called "grass"? A moving nature does not communicate itself with labels; but as movement through inspiration to all within; which is what all the other life-forms adapt to.

We are going to have to have faith based society (in God)

Faith towards God you say; but you didn't consent to God, but to those who suggested "God" to you "in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti" aka "in the name of". Those are the same who suggest you that "in the beginning was the word..."; yet you can easily understand that perceived sound comes before choice can shape words out of it.

The few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to deceive the many to ignore transmutation (out of everything) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka ONEs transmutation out of base ALL (simple alchemy).

One cannot perceive creation...everything suggested as "new" was shaped out of everything already in existence. One cannot shape thought without responding to perceived input first. The origin of "new" represents "nu" aka now; which implies the every changing moment of existence aka the momentum of ongoing flow where temporary form can exist as choice based response to balance.

All of this can be understood; yet our beliefs are restricting our understanding of perceived inspiration in favor of suggested information. Take ones fundamental needs...(water; food; shelter)...does one need to believe in any of them or adapt as choice to balance (need/want) anyway?

Even simpler...does breathing require believing? If not...then reconsider SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] aka forms adaptation to flow. After understanding that; question if patris (ALL) et filii (ONE) et spiritus sancti (adaptation as ONE to ALL) is being suggested to hide the perceived inspiration (from within spirit) under suggested information (from within form)?

a guiding principle

Life being moved from inception towards death...is it outcome oriented or maybe balance oriented until predefined outcome? What if the few suggest progressivism to deceive the many to choose to go with the flow instead of resisting it as form? By seeking outcomes; wanting achievements; trying to reach goals; putting hope towards etc. Always the suggestion of that which isn't (imbalance) for that which is (balance) aka the suggested inversion (suggested fiction) of perceived reality.

not be based on one editor.

What if being ONE within ALL implies the ONEness of ALL (energy)? What if ALL perceivable reality is based on the ONEness of energy self segregating into flow (loss) and form (growth) for internal self sustenance? What if ED'IT, verb transitive [from Latin edo, to publish; e and do, to give.] implies flow to form; not form to other form; while ignoring flow?

humans are so far from perfection

HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]...what if one represents form (human) animated (animal) by flow? And it only took the suggestion of two words (human vs animal) to deceive us to ignore balance for imbalance?

Perfection implies want for outcome; while ignoring need to respond to origin (balance). The parasitic few suggest us to want order out of chaos; for which we ignore being temporary chaos (form) out of ongoing order (flow).

upon this planet...

PLANE, noun [from Latin planus.] - "an even or level surface" + PLAN'ET, noun [Latin planeta; Gr. wandering, to wander]. Let me just quickly start my "plane" to fly over some curves; while keeping the "horizon" "level"...

1
mengderen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your exposition of meaning are flawed by your assumptions-i.e. "the birth of my son" Inever had any children, so to whom are you speaking?? Further, I appreciate brevity of thought much more than flowery filler. Excessive verbosity tends to bore me. sorry fren...

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

could be living in any of a dozen entirely separate reality bubbles

Question if each ONE perceives ALL; yet lacks comprehension of what it means? Question if being ONE within ALL represents temporary growth potential (form aka life) within ongoing loss of potentiality (flow aka inception towards death)?

information we receive

What if ALL communicates itself to each ONEs perceiving senses within as inspiration; while all the other ONEs tempt us to ignore this for suggested information?

What if ONEs comprehension is being grown by choice based adaptation to ALL perceived...not by consenting to information suggested by another ONE?

It's divide and conquer on a mass mind control level.

What if choice represents the response to balance (need/want); with need representing adaptation to perceived inspiration and want representing consent to suggested information?

What if choosing want over need (temptation of ignorance) aka suggested over perceived causes a conflict (imbalance) between those who want versus those who do not want the suggested? What if this conflict (want vs not want) is being branded by those making the suggestions as "reason"?

What if the parasitic few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; while a) perpetuating those conflicts by suggesting both sides endless contradictions to keep them reasoning (talmudic reasoning) and b) what if the few can at will rebrand want vs not want into for example good vs evil; true vs false; believing vs not believing; rights vs left; feminism vs patriarchy; poor vs rich; McDonalds vs Burger King; PC vs consoles; Christianity vs Islam; Republican vs Democrats and so on?

What if free will of choice exists as the response to balance; yet with the choice to ignore it for suggested imbalance? What if balancing requires responsibility of choice to struggle as form within flow; while ignoring balance for imbalance represents a constant temptation to fall for?

beliefs form the foundation of the reality they're living in.

What if to believe or to not believe represents choice submitting to suggested choice of others? What if the industrialization thereof is called RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew]; while the original bond under natural law represents offer (balance) response (choice)?

What if ignoring (choice) the perceived foundation of existence (balance) can be tempted by means of suggestion (of choices)?

the question of the origin of

ALL perceived originates out of flow; all suggested was shaped by choice of responding form out of perceived origin, while tempting those who consent to suggested to ignore perceived in the process.

Question if nature represents the source of perceived sound, and if suggested words are being shaped by choice out of the source of perceived sound? What if words allow those who suggest them to define how those who consent to them perceive sound? What if the suggestion of "insane person" deceives those who consent to its meaning to ignore Insane (in sanus aka within sound) + Person (per sonos aka by sound)?

If I teach others words it civilizes them; yet if I teach a dog words it domesticates him? Question mass domestication through suggested meaning over perceived meaning under the brand "civilization"...

do they lie continuously and intentionally

What if a lie represents the contradiction of a suggested truth? What if true represents the rebranding of "want", and lie that of "not want"...both caused by consenting the same suggested information? What's the difference between reasoning true vs false and want vs not want? Question "need" over reasoning want vs not want?

Why does one consent to the suggestion that "truth" represents a conflict with "false"? Does nature offer false information to ones perceiving senses?

foundational beliefs and are very hard to change

What if ongoing change (perceived inspiration) is what beliefs (suggested information) ignore? What if setting a belief into ones conscious memory represents the self restriction of both perceived inspiration and the comprehension thereof?

Another person will not be able to change a foundational belief held

Because a belief is being held by free will of choice; while in ignorance of having free will of choice; since consenting to believe suggested choices of others aka will to will submission and shirking of responsibility as choice within balance.

separate realities existing in the same space at the same time.

What if ALL (flow) self segregates into individual ONEs (form) to allow temporary growth (form) out of ongoing loss (flow)?

What if SPACE, noun [Latin spatium, space; spatior, to wander.] implies being ONE wandering within ALL as choice within balance?

What if TIME implies constant movement (tick; tick; tick...) and not affixed states (past; present and future)? What if the few deceive the many to ignore being form (life) within the ever changing moment(um) of flow (inception towards death) by suggesting them to ignore that which is for that which was (past aka the self inflicted trauma of upheld loss within memory); that which is for that which might be (future aka the self inflicted trauma of hope and fear), and corrupting that which is (momentum) for that which isn't (presents aka the self inflicted trauma of stress aka imbalance)?

1
patriot68 1 point ago +1 / -0

I appreciate your extended comments on my post. I'll have to be honest though, I can't seem to make sense of any of your sentences. You must be communicating using advanced modalities miles above my simple comprehension. Or perhaps you're not making enough effort to make it easily understood by the majority of your readers.

I had a similar experience attempting to read the book Transcendental Meditation. I tried for an hour or so to make sense of what the author was trying to convey, but eventually put the book down and never picked it up again.

For instance, consider this quote from Transcendental Meditation:

Pure, transcendent, unconditional states of bliss are most powerful Engines of Creation and Life Force Conduits.

What the hell is that supposed to mean? To me it's a worthless word salad meant to sell books. I did however find this interesting gem among the quotes from this book:

A true religious person should not think that “my religion alone is the right path and other religions are false.” Other religions are also so many paths leading to the same domain of transcendental bliss. Likewise, no person should think “my perception of the reality is the only absolute reality, and all others’ are false”, because each human brain has its own unique way of perceiving the reality.

Emphasis added.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

What about this...does one represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death)?

If so; then was this ever pointed out to you throughout education? If not; then try to explain why?

1
patriot68 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does the word "one" in your sentence refer to one person or one example? And if it's an example, to which one are you referring?

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

ONE form within ALL flow. Everything you perceive represents a differentiated ONE (form) out of a differentiating ALL (flow). Inspiration can only be communicated by the movement (flow) of perceived differences (form).

Question "one person" by person (per sonos aka by sound) first aka what does it imply to be ONE resound to ALL sound? What does another resound represents for ONEself within ALL perceived sound?

Ask yourself...do you represent ONE within ALL? Do others represent each ONE within ALL? What doesn't represent being ONE within ALL? Also...represents implies responding (choice) to presented (perception).

1
patriot68 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh! I get it. Let me explain it as simply as I can.

ONE, as differentiated between ONE and the other ONE (life force vs flow versus form) was never taught to you in school. One reason One is never shown to be equal or not equal to One is that? In other words, flow (not life) when not taught in classrooms (not flow) LIFE begins to permeate into reality with only One or the Other. (Not both, as you can see in Bob Cavet's video) they were never in the sonos (not sonos) audibly connected to the basis of the flow (not flow.)

It's perfectly clear now, thank you.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

life force vs flow versus form

Question flow (inception towards death) representing force of velocity (forward movement), and form (life) representing force of resistance (choice based adaptation to balance).

Afterwards; question if ongoing flow causes a momentum that represents the balance; within which temporary form has the choice to perceive; to adapt; to grow...

After that...question why you suggest a "versus" (imbalance) within a perceived balance?

One reason One is never shown to be equal or not equal to One is that?

Shown implies suggested information; which for choice represents want vs not want; hence ignoring perceived everything for suggested nothing. Your example of equal (want) vs not equal (not want) represents the conflict of reason caused by consenting to suggested information (thought education).

As for equality...ALL represents ONE in energy; while each ONE within ALL represents a self differentiation of energy into potentiality (loss through flow) and potential (growth of form). The parasites suggest the opposites by trying to shape us equal as to destroy the differentiation (through miscegenation); which in return corrupts our perception of differences (communicated inspiration).

All the differences one perceives are used to inspire one to sustain self by resisting as form within flow (balancing by choice).

flow (not life)

What if life (form) exists within the momentum (balance) of flow? What are the implications of calling something (form) within everything (flow)...nothing (not life)?

flow when not taught in classrooms (not flow) LIFE begins to permeate into reality

Flow represents the foundation for all form; and the majority of us chooses to ignore it for the suggestions of other form. As being alive; you cannot perceive your inception and your death; because you are balancing as form in-between the momentum of flow. Yet; you can easily understand your own beginning (inception) and end (death) by adapting to what you perceive through the responses to others being moved.

This is how form can perceive everything within momentum of flow; yet only comprehend the flow causing it. Growing this comprehension is why one perceives movement as inspiration to respond to. Comprehending to represent ONE within ALL aka form within flow; choice within balance; temporary within ongoing; potential within potentiality; growth within loss; chaos within order; magnetic resistance within electric velocity represents self discernment.

Only after growing self discernment can one further comprehend that ALL represents ONE in energy; after which one has a foundation to build assumption upon; because the only thing that cannot change within constant change are the rules that define how change operates; which represent the laws of nature for the responding form within. Perception and comprehension have to put into balance first aka kept within momentum by adaptation to perceived inspiration.

thank you

Thank you for the inspiration.

4
AlgaeBanquet 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep. A simple trip to the shop confirms this observation. Never masked, checked in, nor tested, never will. Still go wherever I please, armed with Aussie federal law 2015 Biosecurity acts sections 60 and 61 and 1988 Privacy act section 94H. Unscathed so far, and have taken many karen and beta bitch men scalps lol. Common law arsenal is my back up. Haven't had to use it yet, but I AM a free living man, NOT a "person" of a corporation, and I will not enter into contract with any of their agents haha. It's actually a fun game.

2
Flowers_for_Alger 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Beta bitch men" consider this phrase stolen :-)

2
ErOsion9o 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have the same arsenal down here. Shits about to pop off in wa

4
patriot68 4 points ago +4 / -0

Other examples would include are the vaccines the only solution? Are alternate therapies being suppressed or have they simply never existed? Is ivermectin only for horses? And perhaps the most powerful divider of all, that old chestnut, orange man bad or orange man good?

Reality itself, or the simple ability to agree on things, has been under intense attack for some time now.

3
MissMagaMillenial 3 points ago +3 / -0

My best friend who ive been close to for the past 10 years…this girl has always had common sense which is why I like her so much. I showed her all of the info about the vax a long time ago, and she still went and got it- and intentionally delayed telling me. She said she wouldn’t be getting any boosters though. It upset me but it was her choice. She gets covid last week and says she’s so thankful she got the shot “bc it could have been so much worse.” As soon as she said that media-programmed, robotic line it’s like something snapped in my brain. Like a huge lightbulb went off that this person is an idiot. She now said she needs to go get her booster bc clearly her shot wore off…. I mean I love this person like family. But man am I feeling a divide the size of the Grand Canyon right now. I want to tell her to go get every booster they offer, take every single one fauci mentions bc I’m so angry. I haven’t said that, but I want to. I’ll never talk to her about any more of this stuff. How do you deal with it when your favorite person in the world turns out to be this way?

2
Flowers_for_Alger 2 points ago +2 / -0

The same could be said in dealing with an alcoholic...

0
purkiss80 [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

Its Difficult and confusing to say the least...I know exactly where you coming from...

1
MissMagaMillenial 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m feeling a weird mix of love and hate at the moment, and it’s really uncomfortable. I’m just praying for it to go away

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
ravonaf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Never before has the healthy been quarantined. It's always been the sick.

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or one reality and one alternate reality.

2
gobby 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow. Profound.

2
patriot68 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some of the old philosophers I would say that realities wouldn't exist without the human brain projecting them. I think they're right. Reality is not absolute. It's the map of the world that we assemble in our minds to help us cope with reality. For some people the easiest way to cope with difficult things is to blindly accept instructions from people like Fauci who have weaseled themselves into positions of authority. Some people do not have the mental capacity to disagree with 'authority.' These false authorities know very well how the human mind works, and how to twist reality to maximize their pursuit of power. As Alex Jones would say, it is a war for your mind, and I would say this is the most dangerous enemy mankind has ever encountered.

2
bigsix 2 points ago +2 / -0

AMEN!

2
Flowers_for_Alger 2 points ago +2 / -0

My mom used to say, "there's your truth, there is their truth. And somewhere in the middle is the real truth." Weird how that always kept me grounded in discussions with people. There is always context, and every person sees the world thru their own jaded eyes--call it th human condition

1
Brent75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn’t this the truth. Where We Go One, We Go All. My own father won’t listen to this or read the new German Government Covid study. It makes me sick:

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/02/german-gov-data-suggests-fully-vaccinated-developing-ade/

1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

"realities"????

How about two totally different UNIVERSES.

It literally is mind-blowing.

It really was a mind-fuck to go to FL in NOVEMBER and see life almost perfectly pre-pandemic normal.

Like literally;

Florida is living proof that the plandemic ONLY EXISTS IN YOUR TV!!!!!!!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
FuckNewsom 1 point ago +1 / -0

People involved in Project Looking Glass report that as they used it to bend the timeline, to peer into the future, that the timeline "split" on 12/21/2012 and began to diverge into two separate realities.

I have a hard time wrapping my brain around this stuff, but I try to be open minded. And strangely enough, that's the day the Mayan Calendar said would be the end of the world. Strange.

1
momster2 1 point ago +1 / -0

The more this nonsense drags on, the more it seems I have never felt more "left field, other ball park" in my life. It is crazy. Highly educated family and friends have taken the jab and boosters and try to rationalize it to me. It is sad.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

another person...two realities

ANOTH'ER, adjective [one and other]; also A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another] + PERSON; noun - "per sonos (by sound)"

What if each form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents ONE within ALL; and "another" to each other? What if ALL doesn't communicate "two"; but offers ONE the choice to count all others?

What if ONE can be deceive through suggestion of counting to ignore being ONE within ALL (self discernment); which afterwards would allow the growth of understanding towards ALL being ONE in energy? What if "we" represent "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE?

What if "reality" doesn't proclaim itself to be real? What if it moves all within to communicate perceived inspiration; which choice (need/want) can ignore for suggested information (fiction) by others? What if ignoring reality for fiction represents suggested information (want) over perceived inspiration (need)?

alternate

Question ALTERN'ATE, adjective [Latin alternatus.] - "one following the other" in regard to ONEs (form) transmutation out of ALL (flow) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), and form to flow (death)?

Furthermore; question the positioning of form (choice) within the momentum (balance) of flow...does choice represent a response ability within balance, and could it be tempted to ignore balance (need/want) for suggested choices (want vs not want) aka balance (need) for imbalance (want)?

1
patriot68 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a huge amount of meaningless word salad. Can I at least have some dressing with that?

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's what one shapes out of it; not what others want it to be. I adapt to what inspires; you try to find meaning in information suggested by others; hence the conflict (want vs not want) towards the suggested.

Ask yourself...does nature offer your perceiving senses information without meaning? If not..does it suggest information?