790
Comments (116)
sorted by:
142
M-I-vet 142 points ago +142 / -0

Yes it does. The EUA can only by issued when there are no known safe, effective treatments for an illness. That is why they had to deny any treatments existed, censor any info about treatments, and then create "clinical trials" literally designed to fail to try to discredit those treatments... otherwise, no hundreds of billions from the injections, no plandemic, no vaxx passports, social credit system, etc.

All of those actions have been documented, and will be used in the eventual Nuremberg-style trials to be held. The NEW additional courthouse just built at Gitmo should answer the question of where those trials are likely to be held.

57
Lonegunman65 57 points ago +57 / -0

This👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻!

30
CQVFEFE 30 points ago +30 / -0

Yes it does.

Meaning all testing, mandates, vaccinations, everything must cease immediately, today, NOW.

Not some time years from now when we have Nuremberg 2.0. People are having their lives ruined NOW.

17
M-I-vet 17 points ago +19 / -2

Or what? Are you going to write them a sternly worded letter?

Dr. Malone said it best in his interview with Joe Rogan recently... the government is lawless. They are breaking so many laws and regulations with impunity, while the corrupt MSM covers for them... and the sheeple continue to sleepwalk their way through all of it.

This is WAR, and the corrupt illegitimate government is a puppet of the enemy. Also, this is a world war. It is not just about the US, or the stolen 2020 election. It is much bigger than that. Good vs. Evil, world wide.

I believe this is one aspect of the phrase "the military is the only way". The whole world is basically counting on the devolved segment of the US military to fight back against the DS, and win.

9
Varangian 9 points ago +9 / -0
  1. What percentage of American colonists actively participated in the revolution that started our republic?

  2. What percentage of military engagements did the continental army win?

  3. What percentage of us will it require actively engaging in politics on a local level to tip the scales?

My answer to all the above is 10%.

God Bless America. Amen.

I try to bear in mind; He works through us and with us. I’m all in, and know everyone here is equally committed to restoration of the republic. 100%.

3
Dontstopbelieving 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ve seen estimates of 3-6% of the colonists revolted.

2
CQVFEFE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or what? Are you going to write them a sternly worded letter?

Do you have any idea why you're attacking the messenger, just for saying the plandemic bullshit needs to stop now? You and I agree point by point on everything you wrote after that weird intro.

Maybe try decaf.

3
ThirstyLibertyTree 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can we just start calling these the Guantanamo Trials already?

2
BasedCitizen 2 points ago +2 / -0

...eventual Nuremberg-style trials..."

This should be our litmus test for candidates going forward.

0
magapult 0 points ago +2 / -2

What you and u/SgtPepper29 are missing is that vaccines aren't labeled as treatments or "curatives" - i.e. they aren't things you treat someone with after they've fallen ill, as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are (see: picture). Any physician in the world can explain you that.

Instead, vaccines fall under the label of prophylactic - i.e. they prevent or lessen the effects of a future infection. There are very few exceptions and edge cases (when a vaccine is a treatment rather than a prophylatic) such as some specific cancers.

8
TruthSeeker_6 8 points ago +8 / -0

But the NIH released a paper back in 2005 (I think) which showed that hydroxy was an effective prophylactic as well as treatment.

4
LurkingRook 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hydroxychloroquine is both a prophylactic and a treatment, just in different doses and concentrations (and accompanied by zinc and a couple other things).

2
Dontstopbelieving 2 points ago +2 / -0

HCQ was also described as a vaccine

6
LetsGoFishing 6 points ago +6 / -0

You seem to be missing the point, which is that the unapproved and untested mrna injections were given an EUA under the false premise that there were no known adequate treatments available, which these documents show were known since at least April 2020 (though we know Fauchi knew about HCQ as a prophylactic and treatment for SARS for at least 15 years), and these newly released documents are not only calling them treatments, but curatives in all stages.

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.

Furthermore, there are dozens of current observational data and randomized clinical studies showing both HCQ and IVM are highly effiencient prophylaxes as well as treatments, and, yet, the FDA has recently issued an EUA for mrna injections for 5+ year-olds under the same false premise of "no adequate treatments ( warning direct pdf link to FDA EUA from Jan 3, 2020).

The EUAs can not stand in the face of documented proof of three known "curatuves" in April 2020, known at least several months before the EUA-application was filed by Pfizer/BioNtech on Nov 20, 2020. . An added bonus is "the robust data" they submitted showed a 95% efficacy in preventing transmission.

Another detail I have not seen mentioned, but believe will be legally important in the future, is that this document states IVM "modulate(s) the immune response", which is considered a "vaccine" under the definition which was revised to include mrna injections.

5
SgtPepper29 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ivermectin was just stated to do the same thing by DARPA. With that being said, you do not need an experimental product to do what these proven medications are doing.

2
Thothbag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, gonna go with what rand says to fauci every time he wants to bring up the definition/s "you changed those definitions as a lawyer speak way to circumvent your punishment" It is a vaccine, that is how it is marketed if they are marketing it wrong then that is fraud, if they change the definition without proper cause or through illegitimate means then the change did not happen

44
OkieBowhunter 44 points ago +44 / -0

Think about the implications here... They knew it worked back in 2020 and likely before then... It's still being attacked by the MSM and ignored by Fauci.

A working, safe, proven treatment.

This will not end well.

39
Munchaussen 39 points ago +39 / -0

Fauci knew it worked in 2005.

14
OkieBowhunter 14 points ago +14 / -0

True!

7
OldSchool2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Came here to post the same. Fauci and NIH published their findings, which are now harder to find, thanks goolag. Nuremberg 2.0 ->Impalement for the guilty - partial sponsorship by Frank's redhot sauce, we put that shit on everything, including impalement spears.

8
russiah 8 points ago +8 / -0

Local doctors and medical professionals are all in it, mine included.

5
CQVFEFE 5 points ago +5 / -0

This will not end well.

We'll see.

Meanwhile, Ms. "Because you'd be in jail" a/k/a "If that fucking bastard wins, we'll all swing from nooses!" a/k/a "Crime Against Children" a/k/a fancy-free subject of Q1 is dancing through life with an apple-cheeked grin on her face, basically out there running for [Vice] President.

32
Hannahmac37 32 points ago +32 / -0

wondering if we'll have a case using this and the dates on my texts when my aunt (deceased now) was fighting to get out of the hospital and I was telling my other aunt to ask for ivermectin or hydroxychloriquine (August 2021) ... the doctor that oversaw her needs to lose his damn license!

28
Qasar 28 points ago +28 / -0

This complicit doctor needs to lose more than his license.

18
PhDinNY 18 points ago +18 / -0

I believe that the pharmaceutical companies were smart enough to shield themselves from class-action lawsuits over the covid shots, but I don't think individual doctors will be able to avoid individual lawsuits over dead relatives who died because doctors prevented KNOWN treatments from being used.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
ItsAFreeCountry 3 points ago +3 / -0

Btw, ivm is eua approved for C19 treatment now

1
Bully_Solution 1 point ago +1 / -0

Btw, ivm is eua approved for C19 treatment now

Sauce?

2
ItsAFreeCountry 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn i saw it here but didnt archive. Ill try to find it

spez: been looking for an hour, knew I should have archived it when I saw it! There was a woman who posted on here not long ago that credited this site for showing her where in the EUA document Ivermectin was specifically ok'd, she printed it and showed it to the doc when making her case, which she succeeded at. It will eat at me until I remember exactly where I saw it and when I find it I promise I will update this comment. I also remember seeing it on a video and the producer said to archive it before it get's buried. My bad.

2
USA_mama 2 points ago +2 / -0

It use to be listed as a treatment. I remember Dr Adris saying in an interview that he saved a copy of it from the CDC website before they took it down (because people were red pilling doctors). Couldn't find it on mobile but I do have this Twitter link to a partial screenshot from back then. https://mobile.twitter.com/hannahbayman/status/1270012755026870274

1
Th4rd_R3ich 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think I saw somewhere that it was the WHO who had it listed as an approved treatment.

2
Thothbag 2 points ago +2 / -0

But that's like if I do something illegal and claim ignorance the police will still arrest and charge me... ignorance is not getting you out of trouble

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Thothbag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hippocratic oath is enough They refused to give informed consent Due diligence of information There is plenty you can go after. Also I dont remember fda or cdc getting appropriate authority to make any of these 'mandates' they are only there are suggestion machines unless given the authority which again I dont remember them getting, could be wrong

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Thothbag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, Due diligence and professional development is a must. Kind hearted doesn't exempt you from legal repercussions

6
TheJake 6 points ago +6 / -0

CARES Act grants hospitals and staff immunity if they follow CDC guidelines. AKA genocide protocol.

2
Thothbag 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is where the military get involved, because then it isn't civilian trial, different punishments and laws if tried by military, no?

3
TheJake 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, becomes RICO criminal conspiracy to commit an act of domestic terrorism, sedition,etc.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
NOTWOKE 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good luck. Keep fighting. That's all we can do. Sorry about your boy. It's criminal what they're doing.

2
propertyofUniverse 2 points ago +2 / -0

It may change all at once when someone gets success. Then the law firms will suddenly want your business.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
propertyofUniverse 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are doing really well!

2
polish_snausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Praying for you. I'm so sorry

25
10122046 25 points ago +25 / -0

💥Sticky this💥

16
Europa 16 points ago +16 / -0

Why Yes it does, yes it does.

That’s why [they] suppressed it, lied about it, twisted DJTs words into “drinking bleach” and mocked it as horse paste.

While I would wager many of the faux elites, politicians, and mockingbird media were themselves taking it. REGULARLY.

I’m sure our world class brilliant autists can find their RX history when the Nuremberg trials are set to go.

In fact…I am counting on it.

8
Munchaussen 8 points ago +8 / -0

Was Trump referring to Chlorine Dioxide by chance?

5
TheJake 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think so

13
inquimous 13 points ago +13 / -0

The people playing with words and saying there is no FDA-approved treatment had only a shriveled fig leaf to cover their crimes in the first place.

11
PepeSee 11 points ago +11 / -0

HIPAA means we shouldn't have to disclose vaccine status either, yet here we are

15
M-I-vet 15 points ago +15 / -0

That is indeed a problem for spineless sheep that automatically do whatever they are told to do.

In contrast, when my employer HR recently asked for my vaxx status, I responded that my medical info is private. That was my only response to their "requirement".

They replied that I either had to get injected by Dec. 31st, or file for an exemption. I responded that I would not comply with any mandate. That was the last I heard from HR.

Dec. 31st came and went... and in the first week of Jan. they extended my contract for the entire year of 2022 (senior tech position). It was all a bluff, and I called them on it. This is true for many businesses, but not all.

If they had followed through, I had everything documented for an eventual lawsuit against them for medical coercion. In addition, I have almost a year of cash in the bank, and will be able to find a different job fairly easily if it ever comes to that.

The secret is to not live paycheck-to-paycheck. Minimize debt, live within your means, and build up a cushion of savings. At that point you are free to stand your ground against the petty tyrants at most businesses.

3
Dardar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same situation for our daughter in college. She stood her ground, never revealed her status, never complied with the mandates and never gave any info. Miraculously she was given an exemption. What a fucking clown show 🤡

3
ZerroDefex 3 points ago +3 / -0

I said no when asked 3 times and when I thought they were calling me into a meeting to fire me instead it was to give me another raise as apparently they can't afford to lose me right now.

-4
PepeSee -4 points ago +1 / -5

Why do people on here feel like everything is a Teaching Moment?

Thanks bud I got it covered.

5
AdAstra_PerAspera 5 points ago +6 / -1

Can you contribute less to the discussion? LOL

-1
PepeSee -1 points ago +2 / -3

You first LOL

5
AdAstra_PerAspera 5 points ago +5 / -0

Im out here tard herding!

It aint much, but its honest work.

2
PepeSee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Way easier than cats

7
Make_It_So 7 points ago +7 / -0

YES, It certainly does. This really should end it.

6
Blonde77 6 points ago +6 / -0

Been saying the same for a year, Fren. Nobody in my family wants to listen.

It's like they've all taken on a caveman stance. Shot good. Must get shot. Shot shot shot. "THEY" say (who is They btw?) shot good. Msm amazing. Yes you can still get it but not as bad. Shot good. Fauci a God.

So grateful for you guys.

5
SgtPepper29 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I feel like the problem this past year is that the MSM has muddied the water so much on this issue. Its a very controversial topic. With the release from our own military acknowledging the effectiveness on just these two well established treatments (and we're learning about much, much more) it would seem a new can of worms has been opened. Clearly Pfizer, Moderna, J&J and other big pharma do NOT want this because it will cut a hole in their pockets, but even a left leaning pussy should be able to see the value in this information. I won't get my hopes up, but this is absolutely massive.

5
watchmanonthewall 5 points ago +5 / -0

What are you saying? Don't be ridiculous, there's money to be made here.

4
Crunchy_Bites 4 points ago +4 / -0

It does and thus the war on using them.

4
ATLAS_ONE 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think Peter McCullough mentioned in the JRE podcast that it shouldn't because vaccines are a preventative and Ivermectin and HCQ are treatments. Therefore they technically shouldn't overlap. I may have misinterpreted his statement.

6
Dardar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ivermectin works as a preventative.

6
SgtPepper29 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Per DARPA, it works throughout the entirety of the infection.

1
magapult 1 point ago +2 / -1

the OP and other commenters in this thread don't seem to grasp the difference between a "preventative" (something that lessens or entirely prevents the effect of a future infection) and a "treatment" (something you use to treat someone who's already ill).

By the looks of these comments it's pointless trying to explain, the mob will just downvote you.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
DoMagnum 4 points ago +4 / -0

E uthanize

U nwitting

A mericans

3
NotoriousBIG 3 points ago +3 / -0

It not only negates it, it shows that the EUA was entered into in bad faith, indicating a type of fraud. This is similar to the FISA warrant against Trump and associates, where the FBI knowingly committed fraud to obtain a warrant.

The problem however is a bit deeper. We are not dealing simply with an issue of conflicting opinions, where the evidence could go either way. We are dealing with an institutional crisis in American and global institutions. In the most general form, this is referred to as LAWLESSNESS. Those in power have decided to coordinate efforts to achieve a preordained outcome (i.e., global government as can only be achieved by destroying the US).

So, any understanding that a particular revelation as in the present case would result in a substantive change in favor of freedom is to miss the point almost entirely. We are no longer free. Unless Patriots (Donald Trump led military) pull this off, we are in for a very very long haul, with almost complete loss of rights. Not to be bleak, but rather objective and to the point.

3
JulesW 3 points ago +3 / -0

The FDA has already given approval though, so even though we are currently getting the old EUA formulation, it wouldn’t take long to shift gears and start labeling the Comirnaty if they really needed to. The fucking FDA is a problem. When you add the corrupt CDC and NIH it makes it almost impossible to fight them from a medical professional standpoint. Big pharma owns them all, including the major medical journals, so we are fucked until something major happens to take this cartel down.

3
kkuff 3 points ago +3 / -0

In my opinion, that is exactly why those treatments were squashed. Can't have an effective treatment out there AND have EUA for vaccine; it's one or the other. So, get some big name medical people to talk bad about the treatments and the EUA remains.

Follow the money.

3
special1ntere5t 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the main point that will sink them. Their deliberate denigration of these therapies and denial of access to them will prove their fraud which will break their liability exemptions.

3
numina18 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. The EUA is now illegal, I guess.

3
tiffany46 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. The EUA is fraudulent

2
Oldgal_frdup 2 points ago +2 / -0

I heard there were some doctors prescribing Ivermectin and then the pharmacy saying no. So when one corporation said yes another corporation said no. If I was a practicing doctor, I would start to cover my ass.

2
polish_snausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

And cancel the state of emergency in NY. Our Governor is off the rails with power.

2
bukkakelord59 2 points ago +2 / -0

no because you are a racist!!!

2
MileHiLife 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need original sauce without the header blurred, will come in handy to show doctors, pharmacies, lawyers, fam, sheep, etc. We are the storm, and we're pissed af

2
Onesideeye 2 points ago +2 / -0

The EUA isn't void because they and fauci refuse to publicly say that it works for covid. They say there is no science to back it up and everyone else is the "moron". And their words are "LAW" and the doctors and real scientists proving it works, are dangerous conspiracy nuts, spreading "misinformation". SARS-cov1 doesn't have a treatment, cure or vaccine and it just disappeared...... they won't make that mistake again. Sars-cov1 lasted from 2002-2004 and this one will go for as long as they can

3
SgtPepper29 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I feel like with this latest information we do NOT need their acknowledgement.

2
funwithguitars 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is by far the most under-rated statement of the day. Brilliant.

2
ElectronicSlurm69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oooh, that's a bingo!

2
LurkingRook 2 points ago +2 / -0

Frens — did you see this letter from a top Israeli physician/immunologist BLASTING the hubris-fueled elites for what they’ve done to our world? https://swprs.org/professor-ehud-qimron-ministry-of-health-its-time-to-admit-failure/

2
livingmybestlife 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel terrible for the families of people who died because they were denied ivermectin and hydrocloriquin. they only claimed these drugs to be dangerous so they could push a vaccine. Knew this from the very beginning. I also feel sorry for all the people who bought into this crap and vaxed themselves and their families. And angry for people who felt for whatever reason they were forced into the vaccine. I pray that there are few long term side effects. I hope everyone involved pays with their lives. I believe this justifies capital punishment. Not sure if it was about money or depopulation, or both. Doesn't matter.

1
Advhawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes it does that is all

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
oco0p4pio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this anything more than a General sharing his opinion in a document that was so irrelevant it didn't even received classification markings?

1
LurkingRook 1 point ago +1 / -0

The source of this (paper’s letterhead) has been blurred. Please — Where is this from — and what date? Thx.

1
Brickyard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes.

1
americafirst1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the second time in the plandemic this revelation has come to light. Both releases of Fauci emails. First one literally turned out to nothing, as another commenter has said "So what?" They are acting lawlessly. Knowingly. Don't expect this to end anything. In fact, if any of you are bored, go argue with Dr Mike Simpson about this topic on Instagram. He's former GB but will argue and block if you speak about IVM or this topic whatsoever. He hates FLCCC in my opinion. Blocked me for talking about Operation Lockstep & SPARS2024

1
IveHadAllsICanStand 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes.

1
libtards_r_stoopid 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes.

1
therobots 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck yeah, it does... Hoping that a very smart lawyer pulls out the myriad of SCIENTIFIC (real science) peer-reviewed double-blind published studies for SCOTUS.

1
GOPnoMore_MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

yet we still can't get this shit Rx by our doc and from our local pharmacy.

Is AllDayChemist legit?

https://www.alldaychemist.com/hcqs-or-oxcq-200-mg.html

https://www.alldaychemist.com/ivermectin-12mg-austro.html

1
oco0p4pio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, works fine. They ship in a container that has very general markings on it.

1
GOPnoMore_MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

where from? I am skeptical of actually receiving what i'm buying. Seems prime for scamming the "covid deniers"

1
oco0p4pio 1 point ago +1 / -0

I genuinely don't remember, the packaging went in the garbage weeks ago. It was some LLC or fulfilment facility located in the US. One of the northern states. However, I can almost guarantee you they are just buying it from Indiamart and marking it up. I received 6mg tablets that were manufactured in India.

1
Mister_Winston 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe this is another reason Trump advocated the vaccines. The more people who got vaxxed, the more plaintiffs to class action lawsuits to bring down these companies.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Kektrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Also , though they didn’t give fda approval to any available gene therapy, the media claims they did (the fda did for a legally distinct substance called comirnaty which is not available until 2023), so by their reasoning, the eua should be ended. I question all vaccines now, but calling rna gene therapy a vaccine is playing their game.

1
OneNationUnderGod176 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes

1
cdnthought 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes

1
BettyBlue76 1 point ago +1 / -0

YES

1
BlazingBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. That’s why they fight against it.

1
DoMagnum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ofcourse not, they have not killed enough yet.

1
R3tro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically yes… you now have ammunition , govt ammunition, to take any employer, school, etc… to court and win

1
Delphi373 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why they weren’t permitted.

0
we_let_this_happen 0 points ago +1 / -1

shhh. We arent supposed to know. Actually thats a fairly old conspiracy theory... now proven several times in several countries

0
GoingCamaro 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well sure if you forget to factor in the clown world variable.