Thanks. It seems that Jusitce Thomas is arguing that OSHA laws are about regulating the work environment, not the workers themselves. I found this interesting because this is consistent with the arguments made by a group in NZ, who say that by all means test the air quality, and use non-invasive saliva tests, at the company's expense. But demanding vaccination status is a non-no. They invoke the anti-slavery rule of Section 83 (section 84 in Aus) of the Health and Safety Act 2015.
Can't find a link to validate the image.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a244_hgci.pdf
Thanks. It seems that Jusitce Thomas is arguing that OSHA laws are about regulating the work environment, not the workers themselves. I found this interesting because this is consistent with the arguments made by a group in NZ, who say that by all means test the air quality, and use non-invasive saliva tests, at the company's expense. But demanding vaccination status is a non-no. They invoke the anti-slavery rule of Section 83 (section 84 in Aus) of the Health and Safety Act 2015.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/427291122254409