Video here: https://vernoncoleman.org/videos/final-irrefutable-proof-covid-19-pandemic-never-existed
I am tired of the lies and misconceptions that have been spread about covid-19 during the last twelve months. I’ve lost count of the number of ways that politicians and journalists have attempted to mislead the public.
One of the rustiest lies is that the number of people dying in the UK was far greater than normal last year – because of covid-19.
A hospital consultant I spoke to a couple of days ago was insistent that the higher death total proved how deadly covid-19 really is.
He was wrong, of course.
Even if the number of deaths were higher than usual it doesn’t mean that the deaths were caused by the coronavirus. Many were a result of the lockdowns and the number dying of untreated cancer, heart disease and so on.
But doctors and journalists seem to want to believe the lies because they are more digestible than the truth.
So let’s take a hard look at official statistics which prove that the whole covid-19 pandemic is a hoax.
First, the total number dying.
The UK’s Office for National Statistics reports that the mortality rate per 100,000 population was 1,016 in 2020.
And that isn’t out of the ordinary.
For example, twenty years ago, in the year 2000, the crude mortality rate per 100,000 was 1031.60. The mortality rates vary from year to year and I believe they will soar in the next few years because of the closure of hospital departments and the fact that 4.7 million Britons are on waiting lists and many of those will wait more than a year for treatment.
But, the evidence shows not only that the death rate in 2020 was not exceptional, but that the number of deaths from covid-19 was much the same as the death rates from the flu. The Government’s own figures also show that NHS hospitals have not been hectic, overcrowded or busier than ever. Indeed, the figures show that hospitals have been quieter than usual. I’ve quoted all these figures many times. The staff had plenty of time to make jolly little dance videos.
I have, since March 2020, been pointing out that the Government was officially advised that the coronavirus was no more deadly than the flu. The link to the official proof of that can be found here.
The fact checkers can’t argue with that.
Since the start of this hoax I have been saying that covid-19 is just the annual flu rebranded and better marketed.
The UK Government’s own figures prove that this is true. And I suspect that the figures around the world show the same story. Doctors everywhere have been falsifying death certificates – sometimes because they or their hospital receives a bonus for listing deaths as being caused by covid 19 rather than cancer or circulatory problems. I showed nine months ago that in the USA, the CDC has recognised that most of the deaths listed as being caused by covid-19 were in fact caused by something else.
But let me now prove to you that covid-19 is, in statistical terms, no more deadly than the annual flu. (And, incidentally, patients who have had the flu can suffer problems for months afterwards – it’s just that no one ever called it `long flu’.)
The current alleged total number of deaths from covid-19 in the UK is allegedly 127,000.
Everyone with brain tissue knows that this figure is absurdly high.
But I can prove that the death total is no more than might be expected with the flu – by using the Government’s own figures.
The official covid-19 figures are being rolled up from 2019 – and will presumably be rolled up indefinitely. It’s not the way these sort of statistics are handled. So the 127,000 covers two winters: the 2019/2020 winter and the 2020/2021 winter.
So get a single year’s covid deaths we divide the 127,000 by two.
That works out at 63,500. If the BBC fact checkers use a calculator they will eventually be able to obtain the same figure.
Now, a couple of days ago, the Office for National Statistics produced figures showing that 23% of registered coronavirus deaths were of people who died with and not of the coronavirus. I reckon that 23% is woefully low but it’s the Government figure so let’s use that for the moment.
Now if the BBC fact checkers pull out their little calculator again, they’ll find that 23% of 63,500 is 14,605.
And if they use that same calculator again they’ll find that 63,500 minus 14,605 comes to 48,895.
So there we are.
The total number of alleged covid-19 deaths per year, per season, is a maximum of 48,895 – according to the Government’s own figures.
Now that’s a tragedy, of course.
But the Government reported that the total of flu deaths for 2017-2018 came to 50,100.
That’s their total, not mine. The Daily Mail reported that the 50,100 deaths were blamed on deadly strains of flu that spread between December and March.
You will note that flu deaths are usually measured over a flu season – the winter months. The spring and summer deaths don’t get included.
So, let’s go back to the covid-19 deaths for the two recent winters: an average of 48,895.
We have to remember, of course, that there have been virtually no official flu deaths. Flu seems to have mysteriously disappeared in the time period that covid-19 has existed.
So now we have the proof that the covid-19 hoax is a hoax. A fraud. A deception. A cheat. A swindle.
The masks, the lockdowns, the social distancing and the experimental jabs were all unnecessary.
In 2017/2018 there were more deaths from the flu, the common or garden flu, than there were deaths from covid-19 in the winter seasons of either 2019/2020 or 2020/2021.
Those are official government figures.
A total of 50,100 died of the flu in the winter flu season 2017/2018.
And totals of 48,895 died of covid-19 in each of the last two years.
The fact checkers can huff and puff all day long but they won’t find a calculator that makes 48,895 bigger than 50,100.
Oh, and one final thing.
The Government’s death figures rely largely on the positive results obtained through covid-19 tests. If someone dies within 60 or 28 days of a positive test for covid-19 then, according to the Government, they died of covid-19.
Once again I’ve been arguing for what seems like decades that the figures are absurdly high because they include many false positives.
And last week The Guardian confirmed that senior government officials in the UK estimate that as few as 2 to 10% of positive results may be accurate.
So up to 98% are false positives.
So, there you have it.
The final, irrefutable proof that the covid-19 pandemic never existed.
It was a hoax. The new flu existed. The virus was there. But there was never a pandemic.
And the problem for the fact checkers around the world is that all the facts I’ve quoted come from the UK Government.
https://vernoncoleman.org/videos/final-irrefutable-proof-covid-19-pandemic-never-existed
Good numbers!
It’s has been proven in court in Alberta, I believe, and Spain that COVID was never properly isolated from a human. That shoots the tire of the bus. It also goes right along with your point. It’s just a rebranded, potentially tweeked, parasite completely unworthy of the term “pandemic.”
They have in fact isolated and documented the covid genome of different variants. It's the same as reading and saving the human genome, or the flu, or bacteria, or any other organism. There's multiple journal articles from multiple countries about isolating the virus and saving the genome. Then they do the same with people who are sick and compare the genomes. This is pretty basic biological science stuff.
From the US: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239045/
From Korea: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/
From Turkey: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32936826/
From Australia: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32237278/
Contact these guys, they offer a million bucks to whoever shows proof of isolation.
https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/788
If you trust what these government sites say and don’t have any other sources you haven’t been paying attention to anything that’s been happening
Interesting, can you point me to the facility where I can infect myself with Covid to prove HCQ or Ivermectin works?
🤦♂️
The Vero cells lines are what the virus deniers argue about. They say it’s not Realy isolated bc it’s using another cell to culture it.
But by definition virus need a host to replicate…so is it possible to find a virus without the use of another organism?
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/21/isolation-of-sars-cov-2-refuted-in-step-by-step-analysis-of-claim/
Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists Apr 21 by Jon Rappoport
by Jon Rappoport
April 21, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”
But what if the virus doesn’t exist?
People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.
“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”
I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [1], and he provided his analysis in detail.
I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [2].
First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.
The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.
They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. THAT’S THEIR KEY “EVIDENCE.” This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.
There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.
Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus” they never isolated. “We didn’t find it, we don’t know anything about it, but we sequenced it.”
Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:
STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage [in the soup in the lab]…”
KAUFMAN: “Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a virus when you add it to something else?”
STUDY: “…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”
KAUFMAN: “Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition [to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses.”
STUDY: “…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”
KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”
STUDY: “…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”
KAUFMAN: “Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”
KAUFMAN: “Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture. Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by commercially available filters (GIBCO) [3]. Finally, bacteria may be easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used, streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”
STUDY: “…We added [not isolated] 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…”
STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”
KAUFMAN: “There was no negative control experiment described. Control experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results. Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics, minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since that would not contain a virus.”
STUDY: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”
KAUFMAN: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”
—end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis—
My comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not occurring.
Dr. Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr. Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that “the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.
And finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of “the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists?
Readers who are unfamiliar with my work (over 300 articles on the subject of the “pandemic” during the past year [4]) will ask: Then why are people dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?
The answer is no.
SOURCES:
[1] https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/
[2] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
[3] https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home.html
[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/