Is this the man who will conclusively prove the 2020 election fraud? πΊπΈπͺπΊπΈ
Google his name- Douglas Frank. Main stream media is attacking him everywhere.
Over the Target π―π₯π―
(media.greatawakening.win)
βοΈ OVER TARGET βοΈ
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (91)
sorted by:
I'm on the fence with him.
Pulitzer drags him really hard, claims he just ripped off Piton and Keshel, and did some attacks on his credentials, says Frank+Clements fucked up some audit proposals.
I still like Clements but quit following a lot of the different folks due to all the infighting and religious purity and other bullshit.
Equations/computers/foreign interference, until courts rule on it, is smoke and mirrors to me and requires Government to validate, including Lindell's data that Merritt said was dogshit.
We need people from as many sides as possible to tally and validate the ballots, not a computer. I do see how attacking the computers could be possible, but there's also incompetence, hardware malfunction, and a slew of other problems that exist just to add a 1 to a count, something I was taught in Kindergarten, I'm sorry that America is so goddamn inept that we can't trust our education system to do that anymore, but the solution isn't to make the system more complex.
I don't trust Pulitzer, he and Piton started the infighting. Dr. Frank offered to debate them and they caved.
Piton later apologized.
Seems Jovan is the reason behind a lot of pointless infighting. He may have good intentions, but he is incapable of working alongside others without acting juvenile. Or maybe he's straight up black-hat.