Ok Frens, this may be way off but I was thinking about the Tonga volcano disaster and there’s an article about a British woman who was killed in the tsunami. She was apparently working for an animal charity and died trying to rescue dogs. That made me think back to the Afghanistan evacuation and there was a media storm in the UK about a guy who ran an animal charity in Afghanistan who apparently caused a ruckus about getting an evacuation flight out for “his people” and the animals when other folks were unable to do so. There was a furore about how he was able to pull strings to get the flight. At the time it struck me as odd how there was such a focus on animals when people where in danger and then now there is this article about how this woman died trying to save dogs. The report from her brother seems odd, not much about her but comments about how most of the infrastructure on the island is on the surface and has been swept away (does that mean what’s below surface level is ok?) and a comment about how the “damage will become apparent in the coming days”. A comms cable has been cut and will take 4 weeks to repair is also mentioned. I was wondering if this could be dog comms again or a sort - are the “animal” charities involved in “livestock” management and this could be a damage report? Could the Afghan evac have been for “animals” have been code for moving kids or drugs or other merchandise? https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/husband-brit-killed-tonga-tsunami-25985807

I just strikes me as odd & got my almonds activated