No, it was the original date, the case was filed in 21… prior to the case moving through the circuits. They held off on this case until SCOTUS ruled. It was a brilliant move bc it allowed the judge to use their own rulings to give merit to imminent harm of job or jab.
Always find it interesting that if it's a Trump judge they always make sure to say that.
I created a post to try to help with some of the confusion. The injunction should cover ALL federal employees.
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/141FAZqHch/x/c
November 22 deadline. Is that a typo?
No, it was the original date, the case was filed in 21… prior to the case moving through the circuits. They held off on this case until SCOTUS ruled. It was a brilliant move bc it allowed the judge to use their own rulings to give merit to imminent harm of job or jab.
Doesn’t cover the military though, right?
Does this impact the healthcare ruling at all? They are using the logic of “federal money” based on what I’m understanding.
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/141FAZqHch/x/c
I tried to give a decent explanation of the ruling. I believe it should cover healthcare workers and military