Here's something to consider for those of you that are not religious or on the fence.
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Logically either all religions are either false or only ONE is true since they conflict.
If one is true and the world is being run by evil that is lying to us then that true religion would be disproportionally attacked while false ones would be left alone or encouraged.
I can only think of one religion that is attacked above all others.... Christianity.
If it's being attacked / misrepresented by the people trying to enslave / kill me then it must be a threat to them / their plans.
Ergo you should examine Christianity.
Ok, at this point you're just trying to win an argument where you know you're wrong. Especially since with each response you ignore at least one point I made that you can't refute. (No rebuttal for pagans in the previous comment, and now no rebuttal in defense of islam or buddhism).
Also, you're now changing the topic entirely. The original topic wasn't about "religions" being useful in explaining scientific processes, it was about them being incompatible on a fundamental level with one another.
I also want to point out you just proved my point by saying God and "gods" are different. A religion that assigns aspects to various deities is fundamentally incompatible to a religion that assigns omnipotence and omniscience to a single supreme being.
I'm not going to be responding to any further responses from you in this thread. If you wish to continue making an ass of yourself, be my guest. But a word of advice, don't start an argument on theology when you're ignorant of the most basic tenants of most world religions, like you clearly are since nearly every concept I've mentioned seems to allude you.
Keep insisting God has a Son to a devout Muslim, and you may find out what the conflict is very quickly.