I've started watching the earthquakes around the world, using an app called Earthquake Alert. I'm amazed at how many quakes in the high 3 to low 5 Richter Scale range occur at that depth. Did I read here that the DUMBs are at that depth? Also, all the quakes around Tonga are at that depth. Interesting?
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Shallow earthquakes near faults or hot spots is normal. Where it is not normal is when they occur in mid plate areas. More often mid plate seismic activity is much deeper than 10 Km.
The things that bother me about the earthquakes being at 10km being DUMBS theory are:
I'm not trying to be be oppositional.
The machines they use to dig tunnels are quite secretive. There’s one called Alice and I’ve read of them being able to meld the walls of the tunnel as they dig.
How long they’ve had the technology or advanced the technology is we don’t know.
Some will say that at 10km deep you would be cooked alive. Maybe.
The deepest depths of ocean are 30km down. There is no evidence I’ve seen that identifies the ocean floor as a hot bed.
In the same way that an altimeter measures height above the surface maybe there is a system for burrowing at a consistent level of 10km below surface level. Maybe, this is an optimum level associated with a secretive tunnelling project.
Hate using the word maybe, but given the secretive nature of the DS what else can you do?
I think the deepest part of the Marinas Trench in the Pacific is around 11km.
Yes, when you see a lot of earthquakes at 10 km (amongst other depths, I think 35km is another) that is usually an indication of DUMB action. We saw a bunch around Australia in the past few months, and all near big cities.
Why and how would these dumbs be so deep?? 6 to 20 miles is really down there!
20 miles… yeah that’s gotta be toasty haha
Most of the quakes register at 10km.
You’ll be told that the USGS uses this as a default number.
That holds up until you realise that their equipment can pinpoint genuine earthquakes at depths over 500km.
Either the DUMB theory is right or the USGS is calling it in 75% of the time.
What I haven’t read anywhere is how come the Tonga ‘ volcano ‘ registered around 5.5 to 6 but images exist of a huge type of fallout cloud as a result.
Every week there are scores of earthquakes of 5 to 6 on richter but I’ve only seen an after event cloud once before.
In 2011 when Fukushima was hit by a 9 pictures showed a distorted cloud rising above the power plant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale
Richter scale means that a 6.1 is twice that of 6 so following this through the Tonga event was either off the scale and is being underplayed or the cloud etc may be some form of CGI
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1366055/Japan-earthquake-tsunami-America-nuclear-alert-Fukushima-explosion.html
This might be the most detailed article from the time. The fireball is tiny in relation to Tonga.There used to be images of the sound wave bubble on line.
You can't really equate part of the structure around a nuke plant exploding to a volcano/earthquake. All it would take to verify Tonga is for people to record/live stream it and post it.