Disclaimer: I make no claim the holocaust did or didn't happen. But when you look at facts beyond the official narrative things get questionable. When you look at those same facts with the mindset that we've been hoodwinked for millennia, the official narrative gets questionable.
https://www.realhistorychan.com/holohoax-scholar-puts-foot-in-mouth.html
From my own research, I think that even a lot of anons are going to be surprised at the level to which we have been lied too for our entire lives and the holocaust is just another part of that.
Oh man, most people have no idea what the evidence suggests once you really start looking. How deep does the rabbit hole go?
I think it would take tens to hundreds of thousands of years to get to the end of it (major spoiler in that sentence).
Those Bolcheviks are pesky little killers.
That's popped to mind numerous times watching Europa: The Last Battle
That opened in no less. No seals or appropriate windows(or windows at all), long long list of etc's.
This is an excellent rebuttal of the official holocaust narrative. At some point I will dig deeper into the supporting evidence for and against.
I have seen a fair bit of evidence that the holocaust, and indeed the entirety of Nazism was, at least on some level, designed by "Jewish" (AKA Zionist) interests to secure Israel (and the Temple of Solomon) and set up the UN as a one world communist government, both of which were accomplished by the "failed" Nazi war.
Could they have created a hoax to do it? Possibly, though most lies are based on the truth with a change of scope (lies of omission, lies of exaggeration, lies of context, etc.), so who knows what really happened.
If you haven't heard of or seen Europa: The Last Battle, I'd check it out. It covers from the communist manifesto up to current mass migration. While it repeatedly mentions Jews, I suspect it's Jesuits behind it all.
It is 12 hours, I have about an hour left, but many things more to search further into.
https://ww2truth.com/europa-the-last-battle/
The Jesuits are the Jews...
Or at least they are the Zionists.
I honestly don't even know what a Jew is tbh. The more I dig, the more confusing that word gets. My ex is a Jew (by birth, not religion). Back in the day (long before I had any idea about anything) when I asked her about it, she had no idea what a Jew was, except a specific phenotype that looks virtually identical to a German (in her family's case). It was also the Religion according to her, and you could be a Jew, but not a part of the Jewish religion, or you could be a part of the Jewish religion but not a Jew. I have since come to find out there are multiple, virtually completely distinct Jewish Religions (something I'm fairly certain she did not know).
So is a Jew (by religion) that is not Jewish (by birth) that is not of the Jerusalem Jews, but of the Babylonian Jews, a "Jew" according to the Jews (by religion, not by birth) that are of Jerusalem? How about vise versa? How about the Jews that are Jewish (by Jerusalem religion) v. the Jews (by birth, not religion). Do either of them consider the others to be Jews?
The whole thing is so terrifically confusing. I think one of the world's greatest mysteries is; "What is a Jew?"
Of course you can't really ask anyone that question, because that would be anti-Semitic, even though none of the Jews I know look Semitic (AKA the children of Shem, i.e. Arabic).
I also think that most Jews (by birth) are almost as clueless as the rest of the world about what a Jew is.
Yeah, I've found that to be elusive as well. I'd off shot searched it a couple times while watching Europa being "Jews" kept being used in a blanket sense but surely couldn't be all.
I did find this on sects within the Judaism: https://spirituality.visualstories.com/different-sects-of-judaism
But honestly haven't looked at it yet but have it opened on a tab.
After I finish Europa I'm going to revisit this history of the Jesuits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPOo7DRiqZk
I don't recall Zionists being used with Jesuits, but there is something with Jesuits purporting to be Jewish which is how I drew the conclusion that it's the Jesuits up to their typical tricks.
BIngo. Find the reports from 1925 and 1928 where Polish and Czech Zion nationalist were openly going into Germany and killing small communities and farms. In early 1933, Hitler asked UK and France for help, they told him to fuck off.
Sooooo...... until the Allied forces crossed the Channel, Hitler walked to Paris unopposed. The Nazi's , however, DID make sure to completely destroy Poland and the Czech Republic - why?
And don't forget about March 24th 1933
If you want to kill a lot of people, send them on a looong walk without food. Preferably at winter. It’s been done quite a few times. Why complicate things with gas chambers?
Typhus apparently is also effective, and quite likely the actual culprit of all the gas chamber killings.
The "but" in your "disclaimer" makes it very clear what side you're on...
he's on the side of truth. HOLOHOAX
The butt in your reply make things clear about you as well :P
Im sure he doesnt want pc faggots to jump all over him for his opinions.
No they don't.... It's crystal what side they're on...
The holocaust existed, it wasn't just jews. People were sent to camps and killed in mass. The earth is not flat, humans made the pyramids, the elite are not reptilian. Jews are not evil. The evil elite are evil, and pretend to be Jewish when they are actually Satanists.
how you do explain ALL main stream media owned by Jews then?
How long does it take to reduce a body to ash, TODAY, in a crematorium? 8-9 hours.
Let's say the Nazi's could do that in 1943. How many camps had "death ovens"? 2 Auschwitz and Belsen ; 4 ovens at each site.
Do the math. They'd be burning bodies for 200 years. There was ONE mass grave found over all the camps.
Pictures from Allied soldiers on the days they liberated the camps, why are there no smoke stacks on any of the buildings? You go there today they are there, but clearly can see the brick / masonry work does not match.
How did we know what exactly the Nazi's were doing? They were dumb and wrote down / recorded EVERYTHING they did. Their numbers say about 260,000 died in the camps. The Red Cross world consensus for 1940-1945 had about 260,000 European jews not accounted for : the exact same number the Nazi's said died in the camps.
Ever heard of Typhus? What does Typhus do to you physically? Guess what is used for delousing Typhus?
I'm not a holocaust denier, but man.... a LOT of shit does not add up.
You also have to remember ; when you win the war, you can write the books about it however you want so your kids know we were the good guys. Sometimes, you have to make bad people seem a whole lot badder because you had to do some pretty bad shit yourself to stop them.
That logic is exactly what third wave fees use and what the new black panthers use to justify their hate. The world has been ruled and controlled and decimated by white people or males. And thus white males are evil and should be extinguished. In reality, you found a pattern and attribute that pattern as the reason for the issue. You are just being distracted.
If you find only 1 mass grave does that mean there could only be 1? The fact that there was a mass grave proves the existence.
You are desecrating the memories of the lives of the Patriots who gave their life to save the world. You saying the entire army died for a staged event? These are real solders, who lost their lives, or had extream PTSD when they came back, the stories of what they saw passed down to their families, the pictures the solders took or had taken, that aren't in museums but in homes are real. My great grandmother who survived a camp and talked about the soldiers who saved her, how her favorite food is still apples because that was the first food she had experienced outside of potatoes since she was born inside the camp. Is not nothing but a liar and fraud to you.
I've heard that oversimplified saying before. When you win the war you write the history? No when you kill your enemy you can write their history so long as noone was observing. The issue is that winning or loosing a country write what they want to teach. There were many, many countries that went to war, and they all wrote the same thing.
Could thing have been exaggerated? Sure. Will we EVER know? Most likely not. Did the holocaust happen? Yes...
My friend, I have always, always, my whole life believed we went over there and did the right thing; and I still believe that 100%. I stated I'm not a holocaust denier, because that IS a very large lie to pull off.
I've seen documentaries from survivors that said they never saw the showers, heard about them, but never saw them. I know the person that told the shower story was a Jewish prisoner who was used as Adolf Eichman's bitch persay.
You can easily look at images from the death camps. Show me the connections to the shower areas. Show me how they got the gas into the showers through the water pipes. There doesn't seem to be any images of this set up, ever. No pumps, no contraptions to hook the gas lines up to the water pipes. They just went ahead and cleaned all that up and dismantled everything as the Allies were approaching? The camps were mostly abandoned by the captors when the Allies arrived. I would imagine they dropped everything and ran? That's how we found all the documents and realized what was really going on.
When the Allies and Russians closed in on Germany, there were many Jews that the Nazi's were employing. It's not a stretch to believe these Jews would think they would be considered the enemy. Tell a story - save yourself? That's not really too far of a stretch either.
Hitlers' mom was half Jewish,and Hitler wasn't even German, he was Austrian. The fact that the Zionist groups were attacking German solidifies to me why they targeted the Jews ; plus all the other things I mentioned.
1+1 is not equalling 2 in a lot of this. That's where I actually stand. Exactly like you said : Could it be exaggerated, and will we ever know the real truth?
Just because I ask questions and make factual statements doesn't represent my belief. I don't believe anything... kinda why I'm here with the rest of you :D
Then why havent "real" jews EVER called out the fake jews?
"It wasn't real jews" sounds an awfully lot like "It wasnt real communism". Which is also a jewish invention.
I guess Jesus was evil then? (He was jewish) just thought you should know. I guess you also think the elite don't worship Satan? Odd view you have. If you ever learned history its cabauul that they are apart of. A satanic group that present themselves as Jewish. But you can continue to believe lies. Its fine. Continue hating your brothers and sisters and just make sure not to look up, don't wanna know who is pulling your hateful strings.
He was asking you very simple question why haven't the real Jews called out the fake Jews then? Why do they always embrace and defend them or at least not call them out for certain things?
Many Jewish people have. Maybe you don't know any? Or maybe the ones you happen to know are leftists or sheep like the majority of the county.
Jesus was not Jewish by any measure, be it religion or ethnicity.
He simply was raised by two Jewish parents and taught from the Torah. :)
Nice try rabbi
Cognitive dissonance. You can't argue with my logic so you brush it off by attacking my character so that your mind doesn't have to wrestle with the facts.
Two types of Jew: ethnically / religiously. Jesus was a Jew in both senses.
He completed the Jewish religion by serving as the Messiah (Christ) whom the prophets had long foretold.
The completed form of the Jewish religion is known as Christianity.
Jesus was a Jew by descent, and He lived a Jewish life.
Born in Judah to a Jewish mother
Raised in Galilee in a Jewish home.
Taught in Jerusalem, the Jewish capital.
Ministered throughout Israel: “He came to His own [the Jewish people], and His own [the Jews] did not receive Him” (John 1:11, NKJV).
Jesus said, “You [Gentiles] worship what you do not know; we [Jews] know what we [Jews] worship, for salvation is of the Jews” (John 4:22).
The son of David, the son of Abraham” (Matthew 1:1).
When the angel Gabriel announced Jesus’ birth, he spoke of Jesus’ having “the throne of his father David” and of His “reign over Jacob’s descendants forever” (Luke 1:32–33).
In writing of Jesus’ unique priesthood, the author of Hebrews says, “It is clear that our Lord descended from Judah” (Hebrews 7:14).
Judah was a son of Jacob, and it’s from his name that we get the word Jew.
Mary’s genealogy, in Luke chapter 3, shows that the mother of Jesus was a direct descendant of King David, giving Jesus the legal right to the Jewish throne and establishing without a doubt that Jesus was a Jew by descent.
Jesus’ parents were careful to do all that the law required of them (Luke 2:39).
Jesus often taught in synagogues (Matthew 13:54; Luke 6:6; John 18:20), and even in the temple (Luke 21:37).
In His teaching, Jesus pointed to the Law and the Prophets as authoritative (Matthew 5:17; 12:5; Mark 10:19)
He taught others to keep the law (Matthew 23:1–3)
He Himself observed the commandments.
Jesus identified with the religion of the Jews and was considered a rabbi (John 1:38; 6:25)
He strongly rejected the pharisaical reinterpretation of the religion.
As a Jew, Jesus observed Passover (John 2:13)
The Feast of Tabernacles (John 7:2, 10)
Hanukkah, (John 10:22)
Jesus was called the King of the Jews (Mark 15:2).
The Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament was a Jewish savior, one chosen by God for a special purpose. The Messiah was to serve God by redeeming Israel and then ruling from Zion, bringing peace, righteousness, and security to Israel (see Isaiah 9:6—7; 32:1; Jeremiah 23:5; Zechariah 9:9). Jesus is the Jewish Messiah, the Son of David sent to the Jews, and in His earthly ministry He focused on “the lost sheep of Israel” (Matthew 15:24). But in His death and resurrection, Jesus secured salvation for all who would trust in Him, regardless of their nationality or background. The Jewish Messiah became the worldwide Savior (Ephesians 2:11–22).
If you wanna call me rabbi, that's fine, because I just schooled you.
No, you didn't. And I don't engage with people who use mistranslations and subversion as the basis of their arguments.
There were no "Jews" anywhere in the Bible, and the fact that you try to claim so shows that you're either a lying sack of shit or just simply don't know anything.
Well, there you have fellow conspiracy theorists. Time to crumple the foil hats, disconnect VPNs, and go back to blue pills.
Nothing to see here, everything is exactly as presented.
No, just that not EVERYTHING is a conspiracy. Its like yall have gone so deep that you just flip everything. White is black, up is down.
Yep, and we follow Q!
Its a great day for an awakening, how about getting to it,huh?
Yeah you will eventually awaken to realize 90% of the conspiracies are fake and created by the elite to confuse you and make you sound stupid to the masses. The elite evil pedos are a real thing. Most of the rest is not.
And this matters how when 90% of "reality" isn't real?
The holocaust never happened, not at all to jews. It was typhus that killed them. Shoot, some of the "concentration camp" photos are actually of Germans killed by Allied forces.
Wrong, I personally knew jews that were there and spoke to them. I knew several soldiers from the war. You sound ignorant to the facts And denying something real.
Maybe to you, but I'm okay with that. I personally knew Jews and soldiers that said I don't sound ignorant to facts. So there.
Making statements of "not true" when there is reasonable evidence presented to the contrary is not a rebuttal, it is a denial of the evidence.
If you don't want to address the evidence presented that's perfectly fine, but don't say "it's not true" when you haven't even looked. The only honest response if you won't address the evidence is to say nothing at all. If you want to engage, point out, piece by piece (or even just ONE piece) what is wrong with the evidence presented.
Did you even read the article linked to in the OP? It is compelling. If there is evidence to the contrary of that Holocaust Rebuttal, then show it.
Talk is cheap. Evidence is king. The Debate is All.
Yes I read the article. Having a recreation of a camp is not a sign of it being all faked, the ruins that were bombed not having evedence of an active gas being present is also not evedence of it all being fake.
I considered this to be the least convincing evidence in the article. Did you read the whole thing?
Actually, that's pretty fucking huge. The science of chemistry suggests this is a massive red flag. They found signs of it in the delousing room, but none in the kill chambers.
No fucking way.
That is massive. There would be clear signs of any chemicals used in any chamber, because stone soaks up these small gaseous chemicals like a sponge, The triple cyano bond is very strong (cyanide was a component of the gas), and even if it bonded to something else, it would leave a clear signal of a cyanide group in anything else it bonded to. It is impossible from a chemistry perspective to get rid of such a signal entirely, even if you tried really, really hard. You would basically have to drop an actual nuke to get rid of it entirely from a stone building.
This also was no where near the total of the evidence. Some of the best evidence was in what the official narrative said. It sounded exactly like a fact checker, using all sorts of fraudulent argument techniques.
How do you suppose humans built the pyramids?
Hahahhaha!