It’s a modern day 🔥book-burning🔥! Can I get an AMEN, ALLELUIA?! Link in comments
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (48)
sorted by:
In what history or stories have the book burners ever been the good guys?
This is not The Way.
I don't disagree with book burning but Nazi's burnt pro-Communist propaganda as well as pro-Democratic propaganda.
But what when the democratic rule (mob majority) becomes the norm, and worse the LAW? What then? “An unjust law is no law at all.” -St. Thomas Aquinas TBH, Christendom is incompatible with democracy/ constitutional republics, because it is “man rights” over God, and error has no rights.
You wanna know why we need to remove and/or burn the books from school libraries...the same books the Germans burned? THIS is why: https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/141YNKYI6a/lott-whats-happening-here-video/c/
I feel dirty now. Ugh
😂It’s a church, not a political party/ govt. Freedom of speech works both ways. I’ll burn a book, be it the Quran or satanic bible or Heather Has 2 Mommies or pornography ALL DAY LONG. 🔥
Censorship is whack
While I disagree with the content of the books, I do not advise such events as mass book burnings.
First off, it's bad publicity.
Second, I'm just simply against censorship. If they want to create books of shear fantasy, go ahead and let them. No one will buy them anyway, other than to burn them.
Think about it. By burning them in mass, you have to purchase the freaking books. Which puts money in the pockets of these degenerates.
It's best to just let the book store owners burn the books themselves once they naturally sit on the shelf for 10 months without a single purchase.
It’s First Amendment. Or don’t you support that?
Book burning is a very thin line on the First Amendment. The act of burning something with which you disagree is protected, I agree completely, but the destruction of another's publicized work may not be.
In this case, I'd actually prefer to leave it to the courts. Which means, it's best to avoid causing potential damages to another's intellectual property until a ruling can clarify your full rights. It wouldn't be a wrong or right moral stance, but rather a "don't poke the bear" stance.
I won't stop anyone from burning things, but I won't encourage the behavior either. Just like the books themselves, I'm just gonna ignore it and let people make their own mistakes.
Burning books, etc isn’t an infringement of another’s intellectual property tho. It’s as legal to burn a pagan CD as it is to sell it on eBay.
Accosting stores, seizing the books, and intercepting their sale could be infringement of another's intellectual property. In the Constitution, it is considered under the term "Free Press", which is to say that the Press should be Free from dictates of any governing body, be it official legislators or unofficial mobs.
You have to think about this logically. Suppression of the information goes both ways. If you say it's okay to suppress this book, they can claim the same rights for your book, including the Bible.
This is one of those things that Nations must remain neutral on, for the sake of the honest as well as the dishonest.
Bias can cloud judgement.
The burning is fine, as it falls under demonstration protections, but if they continue to prevent access to the book then you've expanded the discussion into attacking the Free Press.
I wasn’t saying these people accosted books or interfered with sales, that’s a different thing. But you’re so right, First Amendment works both ways; the Constitution is actually incompatible with Christianity. We are forced to co-exist with statues of Satan in public buildings, black masses offered on govt property, etc. The constitution says they have rights, but God says error has no rights. What business hath light with dark?
I'm all for burning any books, just not the Bible. What good have they done for us anyhow? Let the libtards "get smart". All I need is the Bible.
If you never learn how people do things wrong, don't be surprised when you wind up following in their footsteps.
They craft these failed doctrines, and just having the book around to see how they failed so hard and make notes on how to avoid it is worthwhile by itself.
Don't buy them, don't burn them, just ignore them. Fools just want attention -- giving it to them only fuels their foolishness.
Read what they burned. It wasn’t history books. https://www.newsweek.com/right-wing-pastor-greg-lockes-witchcraft-book-burning-1675784
That certainly does change things, but I'd still hold firm on my principles.
Principles aside, as someone who has read Satanic Grimoires in my hunt to figure out how the Cabal functions, I can tell you that the contents of those books are as spiritually effective as praying to God that your favorite sports team win a match.
Real Satanic Grimoires read like law manuals. They are dry, cold, heartless, will even invoke the name of Jesus Christ and use Psalms of David to enslave demons, and any and all rituals are performed with about as much passion as programming a mechanical arm to jerk you off.
The fantastical nonsense in these wicken and pagan books are only as harmful as psychological manipulation can get and have no spiritual significance other than what the reader is already capable of.
Giving them this much attention only empowers them to ACTUALLY have spiritual significance. Best let things of the Devil languish in obscurity rather than struggle with them in combat. Satan is clever, and you can't outsmart him in a battle of wits. Only by showing love and tenderness can you defeat him because it is the only thing he doesn't understand.
Publicizing the burning of these books only strengthens the resolve of the enemy, and encourages their poor depraved followers to buy them out of spite.
If they are intent of ridding the world of something potentially, spiritually harmful, they should have done it in silence.
Ah, but did Christ suffer quietly at the moneychangers in the temple, or did He Himself patiently braid a whip and drive them out, verbally reprimanding them, flipping their tables? There is something to be said for righteous anger.
Good point, but keep in mind that Jesus didn't give it a lot of pretense. He basically just walked by the temple one day, saw them using the grounds for vile acts, and then braided a whip on the spot and took it to them.
It was a spontaneous act, and he acted alone. The reason the money changers didn't confront him that day is because they knew they were in the wrong by desecrating the temple as they did.
Jesus was vindicated not because they were changing money, but because of where they were changing money. If they wanted to do that, that's their choice, but for those who came to Temple to worship, the presence of the money changers defiles the purpose of the Father's House.
Jesus didn't dare walk into the Roman Pagan shrines and do the same thing, nor did he destroy their properties. He largely ignored them in their places of work and instead asked to be invited into their homes to break bread and offer a shoulder to cry on as he forgave them of their sins.
He confronted the pagans in their homes, not out in the open just to make a spectacle.
Yes, they defiled God’s House & Law. What are we to think of pornography, which defiles the sanctity of the body, the Temple of the Holy Ghost? Or sodomite books, the sodomy which God called an abomination, and “men with men, working that which is filthy”, the same crime for which HE destroyed cities? Or ouija boards and crystals, which are direct sins against the First Commandment? God has no problem with our destruction of such things. “But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, nor hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth... Such as I love, I rebuke and chastise. Be zealous therefore, and do penance.” Apocalypse (Revelation) 3:16, 19 🔥 📚
They removed the books from SCHOOLS not bookstores. Parents have the right to censor what their children are exposed to.
Sieg Heil!
I believe they are connecting this book burning with the one the nazis perpetrated. I agree with him, burning books is an authoritarian revisionist slight against truth and knowledge. Even evil books containing garbage and filth. Burning them not only SHOWS fear but it begets it, too. I hate these books as much as the next guy, but burning them is just misguided.
Burning history is covering it up. This is not good
Harry Potter is history?
What good does burning harry potter do? Lmfao. I get at one point book burning was an actual thing that made impact but uhhh the internet exists. There are unlimited copies of harry potter out there same with every single other book out there. A book burning is only effective if the community wont have further access to that book. So unless you live in a cult in the woods or maybe in a remote town without access to internet then you arent doing shit except making a fool of yourself and drawing more attention to the things youre burning.
It’s a symbolic effort towards a moral revolution, and they’re doing more for that cause than keyboard warriors. Plus God is keen on the smashing of evil so...
I dont see how book burning would convince anyone to join our cause. Is it just sybolism for the sake of symbolism? Theres no point. Who on earth looks at a book burning event and thinks "man those guys really have some good and loving views, i should join them!" Its like a more violent version of holding up a sign that says "witchcraft bad!"
I don’t think it’s meant to be “loving”. Think about what Moses did when he came down and found everyone worshipping a golden calf. How did he handle that evil?
and theyre doing more than keyboard warriors??? HAHAHA yeah right. Some small group in some random town burns some books that anyone can get online anyway and that has more of an effect than patriots dealing memes and hard facts to a global audience on a public forum online. Yeah youre totally right
You clearly don’t understand it. Unfortunate.
Lol no i understand it perfectly. You explained it very well. Its unfortunate that its such an awful idea cause you seem really enthusiastic about it.
Lmfao how does golden calf = unlimited online book resources? I get that the books are like an idol but thats the loosest analogy.
This is the bottom line, you do the book burning as a symbol of whatever value you want to push. The purpose of such a protest is to strengthen support and send a message right? Well the message youre sending isnt a good one cause Book burning is IMMEDIATELY associated with authoritarian dictatorships by the vast majority of people. Go ask anyone you pass on the street "what comes to mind when i say "book burning"?" And see what they say. The only people who will look favorably at your actions would be people who are already as extreme and bad at coming up with ideas as you and that pastor.
You don’t understand SYMBOLISM, and this has nothing to do with online books. Further, they burned ouija boards, Disney glasses, etc, so you didn’t read the article. Burning this evil DOES send a message that WE are not going to tolerate filth and satanic witchcraft. If you can’t get that, I can’t help you. Further, this isn’t “authoritarian dictatorship”; this is a church. No, he’s not my pastor. I’m Catholic, we have an Index of Forbidden Books. For a reason. And lastly, no one here championing First Amendment should have any problem whatsoever with this FREEDOM. It works both ways.
Lol yea. It is history.
😂
https://www.newsweek.com/right-wing-pastor-greg-lockes-witchcraft-book-burning-1675784
I have no problem with this, it's their community and their decision to make.