Nobody wants to hear about it.

I'm neither defending Anna, nor promoting her viewpoints. However, I'd surmise since it appears everybody is all but helpless to do anything about SRA, as it's protected by all those we consider "our protectors", there's nothing to gain from harping on and on about it, as sad as the reality of this is.

Also, in fairness to her, whether or not there are above and beyond the normal trafficking networks, which we can presume are in EVERY country, has yet to be established. Thus far, it's pure assumption. Could be true, could not be true. Again, anything above and beyond what can be found in any country.

There's a ton of disinfo and misinfo being spouted right now. As an example, there are no "Bioweapons Labs" --- ANYWHERE --- in the sense that "BioWeapons" are "being created" --- because viruses don't exist and bacteria aren't harmful disease-causing organisms -- so there's nothing to "weaponize". "Gain of function" research is a 100% red herring. So any way you slice it, there's simply "no such thing" as a "BioWeapons Lab", which is what everybody is trying to pass these off as right now.

Now, are the chemical weapons labs in Ukraine? Almost certainly. Once again, we can safely assume these are in every country however.

If we're to believe these "BioLabs" are performing inhumane experiments on animals and humans, this needs to be clarified by the anons spreading the "BioLab narrative".

Bottom line, the mix of falsehood and truth still seems to follow the 80/20 rule. Trying to make sense of it all is near impossible.