Meanwhile on the Controlled Opposition Network (CON actually better suits FNC), Laura Ingraham last night started treading the waters into actual criticism of Paul Ryan's sister-in-law. Instead of addressing Hawley's findings however, she went with a story on the judge's support of CRT. Not that CRT cheerleading isn't a problem, but leave it to FNC to go the divisive route. Certainly every normal person can agree being soft on pedos is a bad thing, but like CNN and MSNBC, Fox wants us to hate each other. It's so glaringly obvious 🙄.
“And her sentences were consistent with legal experts' arguments that find the sentencing guidelines for receiving or sharing child pornography to be too harsh at times.“
First of all, I hate it when someone attempts to start a sentence with “And”. But more importantly, how do we know these “legal experts” he refers to aren’t pedophiles? Appeals to authority are the weakest of arguments. I bet if I tried I could find some legal experts who think Pedos need harsher penalties. That would not make my position more valid either. I suppose I could follow up on these legal experts opinions, but I don’t really want to. Pedos deserve all the jail-time they get, and all the ridicule that comes with this offense. They deserve no empathy. Other than that, this D-bag really had nothing substantial to say.
You know it's a DS hit piece when they claim allegations (or any information really) is "dangerous."
Count me in
Who is QAnon?
Meanwhile on the Controlled Opposition Network (CON actually better suits FNC), Laura Ingraham last night started treading the waters into actual criticism of Paul Ryan's sister-in-law. Instead of addressing Hawley's findings however, she went with a story on the judge's support of CRT. Not that CRT cheerleading isn't a problem, but leave it to FNC to go the divisive route. Certainly every normal person can agree being soft on pedos is a bad thing, but like CNN and MSNBC, Fox wants us to hate each other. It's so glaringly obvious 🙄.
What about prison inmates serving life who has never heard of Q and either killed or seriously assaulted a convicted pedo?
Are they wackos too?
“And her sentences were consistent with legal experts' arguments that find the sentencing guidelines for receiving or sharing child pornography to be too harsh at times.“
First of all, I hate it when someone attempts to start a sentence with “And”. But more importantly, how do we know these “legal experts” he refers to aren’t pedophiles? Appeals to authority are the weakest of arguments. I bet if I tried I could find some legal experts who think Pedos need harsher penalties. That would not make my position more valid either. I suppose I could follow up on these legal experts opinions, but I don’t really want to. Pedos deserve all the jail-time they get, and all the ridicule that comes with this offense. They deserve no empathy. Other than that, this D-bag really had nothing substantial to say.