So the weird thing is the Catholic church is essentially the original Christian church, at least officially in terms of an organization, yet deviated over the years (and almost from the start) from the Bible with its own various (and I would argue, wack) stuff (this post is full of where it came from I'd say, by the way).
What do Catholics consider "Catholic"? Why are they willing to accept random and destructive deviations added along the way like this? Why do modern Catholics accept the modern state of the religion as anything like acceptable when it deviates from the Bible in such significant areas?
(I'm not being rhetorical, I'm actually curious if people want to offer views on this stuff.)
Very roughly - when Rome converted to Christianity it was a bureaucratic decision to consolidate power under the church. They kept pretty much all of the pagan rituals and holidays but slapped Jesus's face on them. They even kept the pantheonic system but renamed them under biblical terms like demons and angels, and then added the saints to replace local deities in newly conquered lands.
There is no "Catholic Church" in the Bible and the Popes have never adhered to the Biblical teachings of Jesus. They use the Christian ideals of sin and forgiveness to enforce obedience and taxation.
With 1700 years of hindsight, it seems like the Catholic Church is just a front for what they themselves would call "satanism" and they could even be likened to what we would call corrupt globalists today.
Well, the first mention of the term “catholic church” is in the Apostle’s Creed. “Catholic” is a term that refers to the universality of the church, that no matter where in the world you go to a body of believers in Christ, we are all united together as Christians.
That said, that original meaning has been long lost to time and distortions, as what became the Roman Catholic church essentially pushed the “heaven on earth” idea way too far by saying that the bishop of Rome is the spokesman of God Himself.
Say what you like, but the words of Scripture (the canon that does NOT include the Apocrypha) are the words of God, and those words alone are the true guide to spiritual truth. Anything attempting to mix other religions (I’ve seen people on this site mention about Islam and Christianity sharing the same God, for example, along with some melding Christianity with Eastern thinking) with the Bible and its gospel truth is falsehood. It might sound close-minded, but I can say that it’s the only spiritual way that doesn’t lead to very dark places.
I have nothing against individual Catholics but I have come to learn there is much about Catholicism I was never even taught. It was an open secret.
Whenever one visits a Roman Catholic Church for a wedding, funeral, or what not, one can ask the priest which relics are contained in the altar. And, if one wants to really appear in the know, one can ask if it's a first-class, second-class, or third-class relic.
What's a relic? Relics are sometimes pieces of clothing, but, in many cases, are the actual body parts of the "saints."
Just what are relics and what meaning do they have for disciples of Jesus Christ?
The word relic comes from the Latin relinquo, literally meaning I leave, or I abandon. A relic is a piece of the body of a saint, an item owned or used by the saint, or an object which has been touched to the tomb of a saint. Traditionally, a piece of the body of a saint, especially that of a martyr, may be with the permission of the local ecclesiastical authority used in solemn processions recalling the specific holy person.
It may seem strange that Christianity, which so adheres to the belief in the resurrected body after the final judgment, should attach veneration to body parts of the faithful departed. But as Dom Bernardo Cignitti, O.S.B., once wrote, In a religion as spiritually centered as Christianity, the remains of certain dead are surrounded with special care and veneration. This is because the mortal remains of the deceased are associated in some manner with the holiness of their souls which await reunion with their bodies in the resurrection.
There's actually Roman Catholic churches which not only supposedly contain the finger of St. Joachim or some other saint in the altar, but are actually constructed almost completely with skeletal remains.
If you've never heard of Sedlec Ossuary, prepare to have your mind blown-
So the weird thing is the Catholic church is essentially the original Christian church, at least officially in terms of an organization, yet deviated over the years (and almost from the start) from the Bible with its own various (and I would argue, wack) stuff (this post is full of where it came from I'd say, by the way).
What do Catholics consider "Catholic"? Why are they willing to accept random and destructive deviations added along the way like this? Why do modern Catholics accept the modern state of the religion as anything like acceptable when it deviates from the Bible in such significant areas?
(I'm not being rhetorical, I'm actually curious if people want to offer views on this stuff.)
Very roughly - when Rome converted to Christianity it was a bureaucratic decision to consolidate power under the church. They kept pretty much all of the pagan rituals and holidays but slapped Jesus's face on them. They even kept the pantheonic system but renamed them under biblical terms like demons and angels, and then added the saints to replace local deities in newly conquered lands.
There is no "Catholic Church" in the Bible and the Popes have never adhered to the Biblical teachings of Jesus. They use the Christian ideals of sin and forgiveness to enforce obedience and taxation.
With 1700 years of hindsight, it seems like the Catholic Church is just a front for what they themselves would call "satanism" and they could even be likened to what we would call corrupt globalists today.
Well, the first mention of the term “catholic church” is in the Apostle’s Creed. “Catholic” is a term that refers to the universality of the church, that no matter where in the world you go to a body of believers in Christ, we are all united together as Christians.
That said, that original meaning has been long lost to time and distortions, as what became the Roman Catholic church essentially pushed the “heaven on earth” idea way too far by saying that the bishop of Rome is the spokesman of God Himself.
Say what you like, but the words of Scripture (the canon that does NOT include the Apocrypha) are the words of God, and those words alone are the true guide to spiritual truth. Anything attempting to mix other religions (I’ve seen people on this site mention about Islam and Christianity sharing the same God, for example, along with some melding Christianity with Eastern thinking) with the Bible and its gospel truth is falsehood. It might sound close-minded, but I can say that it’s the only spiritual way that doesn’t lead to very dark places.
100%
I was born, raised, and educated Roman Catholic.
I have nothing against individual Catholics but I have come to learn there is much about Catholicism I was never even taught. It was an open secret.
Whenever one visits a Roman Catholic Church for a wedding, funeral, or what not, one can ask the priest which relics are contained in the altar. And, if one wants to really appear in the know, one can ask if it's a first-class, second-class, or third-class relic.
What's a relic? Relics are sometimes pieces of clothing, but, in many cases, are the actual body parts of the "saints."
Just what are relics and what meaning do they have for disciples of Jesus Christ?
https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/culture/catholic-contributions/church-teaching-on-relics.html
There's actually Roman Catholic churches which not only supposedly contain the finger of St. Joachim or some other saint in the altar, but are actually constructed almost completely with skeletal remains.
If you've never heard of Sedlec Ossuary, prepare to have your mind blown-
https://unusualplaces.org/sedlec-ossuary-the-gothic-wonder-of-thousands-of-bones/
This kind of pushing it in terms of "ick"???