Specifically, has anyone here ever played through the Dark Brotherhood Assassination Guild storyline?
SPOILERS!
Remember how one of the members went rogue and swapped the dead-drop instructions for contract murders the player would follow to arrange new targets, which you later discover were members of the Dark Brotherhood, in order to exploit the compartmentalization methods of the organization as to very quickly take out key operation-critical positions within the guild, all while planting a paper trail to the player's handler, thereby framing Lucian Lachance, such that the other heads of the guild mutilate him most violently for betraying the guild, concluding with arranging a meeting with the Night Mother to name a successor where the rogue member would be in attendance all for the grand purpose of destroying the spiritual heart of the evil organization and destroying the Night Mother?
Why am I bringing this up?
Oh, because it's actually a good plan, if you disregard the fact the guy who enacted it had serious mental problems stemming from a pent-up aggression which manifested from having witnessed his mother get beheaded by a member of the guild, sending him on a life-long journey to avenge his mother while also fulfilling his desire to slaughter and torture people to appease his mother's rotting head.
Just consider the fact that all news anchors, politicians, CEOs, tech giants, and everyone else who is either blackmailed or profits off the dissemination of propaganda requires what are effectively dead-drop 4AM talking points in order to hypnotize the masses or make critical policy decisions.
Oh, and if they question their orders they will immediately be blacklisted as hostiles for being non-cooperative to the NWO agenda. The Paranoia in such a system is palpable. It is a mafia, after all. They must necessarily police themselves.
It would be a shame if someone with a grudge were to come along and replace all the dead-drops, giving all the agents instructions to follow, telling them to target key Cabal infrastructure, narratives, and interests, aye?
Say you found out someone was cheating at chess, and had an earpiece where they were getting instructions from a thinktank of chess masters who have bet everything on you losing the match.
Would it be wise just to cut the feed to the mic?
Or is it a smarter idea to take control of the mic feed, and then tell your adversary moves that 90% of the time make sense and look like good moves?
But 10% of the time you give them disastrous instructions which sacrifices pieces that set them back at least 2 moves in progress...
Would they lash out and stop following the instructions? Well, since 90% of them are good instructions, if they were to refuse to follow them then they would give themselves, effectively, a 90% chance of losing the game -- a damn near guarantee that they'll fail.
It actually would be better if they just yanked the mic out, and cut off influence from the power of suggestion.
BUT, here's the clever part, what if arrange it so they never know for sure that the mic feed has been intercepted.
Keeping up that illusion casts a fog of war so thick that they might as well be underwater.
Or even better, you let the bad guys keep control of the mic until the critical move, then intercept the mic feed at just the right moment before they have a chance to suspect anything. Those are the big-brain plays right there, but you only have one shot before the bad guys take the mic control back and tell your opponent that last message wasn't from them. Otherwise, maybe it's just better to permanently cut the mic from then on, huh?
I feel like I've seen this scheme in a movie before... Any recomendations?
Of course, you can't just tell them to checkmate right as soon as you gain control of the mic. The goal is to drag it out so long and make it look like a real game, then, at the last moment, tell them to make critical errors and rely on the fact that they've been conditioned to just follow instructions and not play the game themselves. Lulled into a sense of security, they make the key suicidal move without realizing it, and it may even take a couple turns to realize they've been had and the jig is up.
The shellshock would then blind them long enough to hand you a sure victory.
Why is it taking so long?
Because, I suspect, Patriots are following this method. This is why the narrative has gotten so extreme. The mouthpieces don't know they're making bad decisions. Throughout Trump's presidency, they'd been lulled into a sense of security, that their moves were being directed by their real masters and that Trump didn't manage to yank the mic controls away.
They likely suspected something was wrong, however, but since the plays were all logical, the fact still pervaded their minds -- that any and all deviation from the instructions would be seen as siding with the enemy during a time of war, which is grounds for immediate termination.
They are backed in a corner, and have to do as they are told.
Which is to say, they know that some are being instructed by their enemies, but there is no clear pattern to determine WHO has had their mic feed intercepted. If they deviate, they are punished, and no one really can tell who punished them.
No one is sure of anything.
Their compartmentalization tactics, where everyone is on a need-to-know basis with only top-down instructions with no ability to question commands is the soft patch on the belly of the dragon.
I suspect that the total insanity we are seeing right now alludes to the fact that the checkmate is FINALLY being set up, and the shock of these news anchors and politicians pushing narratives they know will ruin them but still can't be sure it didn't come from their crazed NWO masters is becoming ever more noticeable.
This is the PANIC and Enjoy the Show which Q talked about.
Their communications have been irrevocably damaged, but it wasn't immediately so. Things moved so slowly they thought they still were winning. If they discovered they'd lost from the very start, they would have blown everything up.
The only way to prevent the hostage from getting shot is to assure the hostage-taker that they have a chance to get away. As soon as they realize they can't win, they'll off the hostage. In other words, don't let the snipers on the roof be seen, or your hostage is gonna need a body bag.
The final nail in the coffin is that after decades of never having to think for themselves, they are all lost and scattered as to what they should do now to not go down with the ship. Their head has been cut off, and are running around like headless chickens now.
Anyway, that's my theory. If I were to choose a plan, this would probably be it, so I guess it's safe to say it is happening in some capacity.
Thoughts?
Thanks. I've been thinking about starting my own blog for odds and ends.
Is there a way to keep a substack account anonymous?
Also, there is some benefit in keeping everything on a single platform, as I have done here on GAW. It makes it so I don't have to keep track of two discussion threads at a time.
I'd also like to iterate thanks. Excellent post OP. It's been too long since Ive played Oblivion, but you got the cogs turning in my braincase...
Do you remember the Q/Q+ MSGS "Punished Trump" hypothesis from the chans? Your TES correlation to various habbenings is spot on!
Not only does the DS broadcast shit to us via the media, but they also steal ideas from it too. "like why didn't we think of that!?"
No doubt this circular ven method of connections is used by both white & black hats. Anywhere the web can intersect is justifiable as it strengthens the timeline's structural integrity.
Also, I wanted to add that your post reminded me of the game system comms. That shit was wild when it was initially uncovered and confirmed by Q. Power to the players indeed.
The decoding symbols guy is anonymous on WordPress. Seems to work for him. Don't know about other platforms.
Great analysis. And yes, it was a great storyline. Brotherhood in Skyrim was a let down in comparison… don’t think I finished it, just got too dark!
Oh, and their plan to hedge against this is as follows:
Which is to say, that having more than one mic feed might be cumbersome, but it's the only way to ensure you are getting untampered instructions.
If even one of your dead-drops has a differing set of instructions, then you know the whole scheme is compromised and to demand a new set of talking points.
A diversity of instruction sources is necessary.
This, however, hasn't worked for them.
Why?
Because their leaders were so freakishly power-hungry and cutthroat that they secretly consolidated power in a big circle-jerk.
Just like how CNN writes a story about an investigation into Trump citing the FBI as their source while the FBI cites that exact same CNN news story as their evidence in the investigation.
There are indications they've done this and had not realized it.
Because of their sloppiness, they've disqualified the "Diversity is our Strength" tactic from ever being a plan of action. They can't forgo their scorpion nature long enough to get across the river on the back of the frog. Or, if you'd rather, Trump's favorite version "The Snake."
Give a man enough rope and he hangs himself.
I have heard Ricardo Bosi say something supporting your hypothesis which is an impressive spiel.
I paraphrase but something about the "the middlemen are not getting their talking points or strategic advice" and that they are cut off.
I am sure I have also heard him alluding to them getting specifically wrong orders/ talking points from white hats inserted into their comms hierarchy.
Nice work here.
I used to play this 'game' nearly every night before going to sleep for decades. Not the video game you mention, but what gave birth to it. the idea of
How to unravel the centuries old Gordian Knot.
One could say the game theory plotline is almost identical in Assassin's Creed: Odyssey and even GTA.
Form follows function, Necessity is the Mother of Invention and "write what you know" as Game Developer.
Game Developer as both Predictive Programmer and creator of virtual realities.
Shall we play that game?
Searching for clews in the Labyrinth.
Q: Did Discordian Gregory Hill aka "Malcalypse the Younger" become a Game Theory poobah at S. Illinois U. ?
Switching up his game and character in the Magnum Opus? Mr. Mystery says 'Hmmm...."
Greg is from McGraw-Hill publishing family. Before that, railroad parts. A serial killer in the family. Shh.....
Mother was "The Lady in Red" of Jfk assass infamy. Jean Hill
Did he marry a prominent Ivy League prof black woman and have Lauren Hill as a daughter?
Gee it's hard to say. The guy disappeared with Doppleganger prints thrown down. Who's Lauren Hill's father? Good luck. What happened to Lauren Hill again?
The Games people play.
Ketanji getting nominated might be a marker.
Like I said with the hostage situation -- you lose when the hostage-taker thinks he cannot escape. They will blow away the hostage.
So, you have a car drive up with a bag of cash in the back.
They ease off the trigger a bit, but that doesn't mean you have any intent of letting them step foot in that car.
We're waiting for the hostage-taker to move the gun away from the head of the hostage for just a single moment.
Boom.
Clean. No deals. Hostage safe.
It may take a while, and the hostage IS IN DANGER, but there is no other way.