the Post has been pretty good the past few years.. maybe you are confusing it with the times?
Regardless I don't think anyone is taking everything the post says as true. the entire point of this is to be able to discern for yourself, research and make your own decision. Don't look at posts as statements of verified fact, but as interesting topics for possible research.. or shitposts and fun/lighthearted entertainment.
Don't expect everyone to come loaded with all the facts, if you are open to a new idea or thought on a topic you'll entertain ideas and research.. and if you're not you'll get angry and rationalize why you're unwilling to.
That being said it's always appreciated when anons share their research too. So why do you think the New York Post is wrong on this story?
the Post has been pretty good the past few years.. maybe you are confusing it with the times?
Regardless I don't think anyone is taking everything the post says as true. the entire point of this is to be able to discern for yourself, research and make your own decision. Don't look at posts as statements of verified fact, but as interesting topics for possible research.. or shitposts and fun/lighthearted entertainment.
Don't expect everyone to come loaded with all the facts, if you are open to a new idea or thought on a topic you'll entertain ideas and research.. and if you're not you'll get angry and rationalize why you're unwilling to.
That being said it's always appreciated when anons share their research too. So why do you think the New York Post is wrong on this story?