409
Comments (59)
sorted by:
53
Grady_Wilson 53 points ago +53 / -0

In what world is it logical to send a President or VP to an actual active war zone if the war zone is as bad as Pravda is saying it is?

22
Quantachyon 22 points ago +22 / -0

NOTHING is logical with the current administration...

Unless of course their plan is to destroy the USA.

6
Callmejuls 6 points ago +6 / -0

You mean regime? Fully communist which is why nonsense

3
LiquidRitz 3 points ago +5 / -2

GEOTUS did walk into North Korea... just saying.

7
Grady_Wilson 7 points ago +8 / -1

It wasn't an active warzone with missiles and artillery flying around, now was it?

And Rocket Man had to have known there was at least one nuclear sub not far offshore that had already target locked most of NK during that event.

0
LiquidRitz 0 points ago +1 / -1

We both know it wasn't but NK was far more vocal and active in their threats than Russia.

We also know 99% of the BS coming out of UKRAINE could be used to fertilize the NK DMZ and feed the world.

You know the comparison is relevant and works but go ahead and be an idiot about it.

8
MEGAMAGAULTRA 8 points ago +8 / -0

None. Zero. I can't think of a major engagement or conflict in which a major country sent their president. It's extremely unusual they would send Biden. I mean with CoViD he should probably just stick with a video call lmao

5
Nomoralcompass89 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is there a reason were not including all the times a U.S. President went to Iraq or Afghanistan to visit troops on a holiday like Thanksgiving or Christmas? While i dont care for the other lesser presidents, when Trump did it, it was very secretive and all the MSM could report was how Trump was nowhere to be found around D.C. Nothing was told to the MSM and pictures of Trump with the troops only surfaced after AF1 was back in the air on his way back.

8
Bully_Solution 8 points ago +8 / -0

And the US Military controlled the skies when Trump went. Where do they want to send Biden? Tell me again who has control over there?

4
MoLibertyson 4 points ago +4 / -0

FDR went to Morocco when the US invaded North Africa 1942-43 is the only one that comes to mind. And that was eighty years ago.

2
KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

What would they do, throw cheap hashish at him?

1
MoLibertyson 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was the Casablanca Conference with Churchill.

1
MEGAMAGAULTRA 1 point ago +1 / -0

And that was FDR, being FDR, wouldn't really expect anything else from him haha.

2
Diana22 2 points ago +2 / -0

UK sent Boris Johnson. I know, it’s Boris, but he is Prime Minister. They even did an outdoors walkabout…

Crazy.

1
Voteordie 1 point ago +5 / -4

Trump went to North Korea… lol

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Korean War was in the 50's..

-1
Voteordie -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yeah because that’s what I was talking about genius. War isn’t just boots on the ground anymore, try to keep up ya boomer.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having a rough day?

-2
Voteordie -2 points ago +1 / -3

Your stupidity has no bearing on my day, Per-usual boomers don’t understand that.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny thing is I'm not a boomer yet you keep insisting it, showing your ignorance. I'm 30 years old, you brilliant mind.

1
MEGAMAGAULTRA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not an "active" war zone, but I understand your point.

0
Voteordie 0 points ago +1 / -1

The armed guards shooting people on sight in the DMZ would beg to differ.

6
Jacurutu99 6 points ago +6 / -0

They don't give a fuck about logic and I have always suspected that the person playing Biden would be eliminated permanently at some point in all of this. Either not knowing exactly what he signed up for and they send him to his death or make it appear so, and his character is taken off the table, probably much to his relief. To the normal sphere, the Biden "death" (in in a bombing fashion or assassination) is going to achieve a degree of sympathy that will not be achieved otherwise. Cnn faithful will say "Well, he was a flawed man, but he was trying, he was confused when he headed over there, and we should be respectful of what he tried to do for us." They will go for the same type of JFK saddness for someone who doesn't deserve it. They don't get to unlock those emotions without his "death."

3
PandoraBoxed 3 points ago +3 / -0

"...the same type of JFK sadness" could NEVER be duplicated with Potatus. I remember my teacher coming back late from lunch, crying, dismissing the class to go home early. I remember my mother crying and the black-and-white television coverage of the funeral. The nation was mourning and in shock. CNN faithful will NEVER unlock those emotions felt in 1963.

2
Jacurutu99 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, it definitely wouldn't be the same type of sadness... I should have phrased it as they would push for that sort of reaction. The normal folks who have been made to think Joe can possibly do no wrong will be the only ones that this approach would work on.

4
MuckeyDuck 4 points ago +5 / -1

Where are the White Hats that Q says are in control of Military and events?

Nuclear War is a steep price to pay to wake up a few normies.

4
REDCYBER45 4 points ago +4 / -0

No white hats except us. We are the only ones. And we're damn good and we are the best. They underestimated us.

2
KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe, but at times it does feel like we'll be taken to gulag and someone will say "it's part of the plan, white hats are in control!" 😆

3
UltimateMastermind 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just remembered something about shot heard around the world. But I think it has different meaning and it would be too much.

13
TSearch 13 points ago +13 / -0

Can’t even begin to imagine the logistics for either one to visit a war zone not controlled by the U.S. military. Easier to imagine the event happening on a soundstage.

1
Voteordie 1 point ago +4 / -3

Trump went to North Korea… literally stepped foot into NK. Come on guys let’s not be stupid

11
VetforTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

Theybdont uave to send biden to Ukraine for that. They could kill him and make up any story they want and the idiots will all believe it with a sigh of relief.

3
DesertBrat 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's my thinking. Remember when that one guy was poisoned in the UK a few years ago. It was reported that Russia was responsible. Similar type scenario could happen within the U.S.

9
numina18 9 points ago +9 / -0

We don't have to go to war if there is a Presidential assassination. Never have done it before, even though the other Presidents were murdered in America. Just let the wheels of justice turn VERY SLOWLY.

6
VetforTrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sadly corrupt Americans killed all our own guys

4
ghost_of_aswartz 4 points ago +4 / -0

One way Biden can be safe is to bring Hillary Clinton with him

Because evil never dies

4
Awakenednotwoke 4 points ago +4 / -0

Biden is going to the Ukraine? That's crazy. But Julian's Rum has a great theory.

3
tars357 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's their plan for sure. World War I began with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what they tell you.

3
LilyBee24 3 points ago +3 / -0

They love to make martyrs out of pedophiles.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
trolltide 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed

2
Cuomos_nipple_rings 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whoa that sounds like a very strong possibility. Imagine whitehats actually having to try and keep Brandon safe from his own regime to prevent ww3

2
ravonaf 2 points ago +2 / -0

If White Hats are in fact in charge. This will never happen.

1
Brent75 1 point ago +2 / -1

Agreed. They’d put things in place to keep Xiden from being harmed. Because I don’t see a way they’d avoid the sheep calling for war if Xiden is killed/boned while being there, and they say it’s Russia’s fault. All the sleeping sheep would demand revenge. And anyway, isn’t Zelensky not even in Kiev but somewhere else and safe? Probably safe near a nice movie/TV studio in Romania or Poland so he can freely shoot his propaganda.

2
MuckeyDuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well this kind of goes along with Col. Macgregor's statement Friday:

The most dangerous time will be when the Russians are close to achieving their objective in Eastern Ukraine, and the western media will be faced with having to reconcile the difference between the propaganda they have been selling to western citizens and the actual truth on the ground. That’s when the western alliance is likely to do something drastic.

1
CoolAsACucumber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this on Truth Social? I can't find the message online

1
LiquidRitz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they'll capture him and we can pretend he never happened in the first place...

Just kidding. He needs to see justice here.

1
angrysnowpede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Send Kamala to cackle the Russians to death.

1
uk9994 1 point ago +1 / -0

They could just give him a booster shot...

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +1 / -0

And they also want it to retain power over distracted, fearlful populace.

1
Island_Photo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I miss JR... What about? Zelensky accidentally chemically neuters Ol'sniffy heads, chastised by the Easter Bunny as he lays chocolate eggs (not the bunny you fool!)

1
Island_Photo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Triggering the Geneva Convention..

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Merkava_4 0 points ago +1 / -1

I thought the military was in control, but that was before they started "vaccinating" all the personnel; now I have my doubts.

-1
WeAreTheBadGuys -1 points ago +1 / -2

Not going this way. Nice clickbait.