Comments (14)
sorted by:
nolasquid33 8 points ago +8 / -0

I just don't understand bc if it wasn't for AJ and IW I would NOT be awake

M67frag 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not necessarily true, other people might have picked up the same stories and covered them in a way that added legitimacy to them. For years Alex Jones was an incredible tool for making a story untouchable. Got something you cant hide but want ignored? Have Alex Jones talk about it, and when anyone else brings it up smear them by saying it's a alex jones conspiracy theory.

Alex may not even be in on this. He could be totally innocently trying to bring people the truth, but because he is bombastic and a offputting to "serious" folks he was funneled stories as a limited hangout and discredit mechanism.

But Alex developed a track record for being right about things, and they ended up turning him into a folk hero and embarrassing themselves.

KekistaniMemeLord 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like this take the best

TangerineShine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or you have the “keep your friends close and enemies closer” take.

If you watch Infowars, you know Alex invited on Dr Ardis this past week. He discussed the venom and water topics.


As an IMEDIATE follow up he brought on Dr Richard Flemming. Dr flemming immediatley pointed out holes in Dr Ardis’ training.


If you don’t watch the clips, you’re lacking information therefore unqualified to speak on the matter.

TangerineShine 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same. Don’t buy this shit. Alex is highly effective and we are watching a HUGE attack on pretty much every honest patriot.

How do I know?

Because I’ve never seen x22 attacked by people outside the movement until this past week. Dave is legit and Alex is legit. They need to infiltrate our movement with false narratives in order to drive us from the truth.

Which makes more sense? Alex Jones is a “JoO MoSsAd” or our movement is being infiltrated by agents and their false narrative?

It’s part of their playbook. Think of everything you’ve witnessed.

RealCleanUpPhilly [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

Bottomline: the idea that IW is bankrupt due to Sandy Hook lawsuits is fake news. They were covered by insurance for this event. What changed? Ukraine's black hat IC government, closely tied to CIA/Mossad/Five Eyes black hats, has fallen to Russia. IW won't be the only IC funded op that lost its primary revenue stream.

RealCleanUpPhilly [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

And I say this as someone who is an IW superfan and was shocked when Q posted that we need to dig on who pays for IW and why. The answer is it is a limited hangout meant to keep news coverage on unapproved topics in the rough. AJ reveled in being labeled a conspiracy theorist and anyone trying serious journalism was marginalized like David Knight or PJW. Can they survive without black hat funds? I think it is possible. But expect big changes.

winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

and now they're switching AJ out with their new fresh face of bullshit mixed w truth: Stew Peters

000000001 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here we go. The Stew Peters shill crew are back.


winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am warning people about him and the other grifty liars that people who follow him also follow. If I were a nefarious agent I would promote "Watch the Water" with the same energy I'm opposing it with

lovecymru 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why should we donate to Mossad?

TangerineShine 1 point ago +1 / -0


ThisIsHowItStarts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for taking sense!

hisnamewassethrich17 1 point ago +1 / -0