Putin IGNORES Easter truce ... fresh attacks by Russians try to steal victory ...
Putin's invasion ...
Russian warmonger boasts ... will be ready to strike Britain by AUTUMN
Mass graves ... 'liberated' by Russia ... extent of Putin's carnage ... orders ... starve them to death
One of Putin's choppers ... blasted out of the sky
Marine Le Pen slumps in the polls ... a Russian puppet who would spark CIVIL WAR
Putin's Chechen warlord ...
Very one-sided. Plus, he has a weird way of capitalizing words in titles, which is not the "official" way of doing things (I do it all the time, but I don't get paid to promote propaganda like he does).
That's not the point. The point is that it is one of many biased titles, and none that were biased in the other direction. Ergo, anything he writes is suspect, because he is clearly not an objective reporter/writer.
Are we supposed to have a vested interest in Putin winning big and not selling disinformation himself?
Nope. But again, not the point.
The point is the bias, not the specific claims. Not only is the writer biased, but he appeals to emotion, which is another indication of manipulation rather than objective journalism.
Hah! From the 'DailyMendacity' themselves, who use Ukro-Nazi statisitcs.
No, my friend the Russians are winning it. It just takes longer without killing civilians. And this is what the Russians are doing.
That "pride of its navy" was a 40 year old ship. That spells out a ship at the very end of its longevity. Whether this was a false flag act or not (I have my suspicions), it has become Russia's own 'Pearl Harbor' and has completely galvanized the Russian people behind the Russian Police action in Ukraine.
Yet in spite of the details the Ukrainians are losing so badly it is not even close...seems Force Adcdefyadayada is doing just fine with out the hardware. 😀
Russia says the ship was being towed back to port, and during that move a storm sank the ship.
So, both towing and sinking could be true.
What is really REVEALING, though, is that it seems that no "journalist" as gone to the minimal trouble of finding out if there WAS a storm in that region at that time.
If not, they could shout and scream that Russia is lying.
But they don't seem interested in that.
They also don't seem interested in finding out if Russia retaliated against the "missile strike" by blasting the Ukranian source of the missile.
They also don't seem interested in finding out if Russia STILL has ships in the area, which would mean they are not concerned about any missile strikes sinking other ships.
Gee ... I wonder why ...
Could it be ...
Nah, unthinkable!
I mean ... could it be ...
That the Deep State Propaganda Media is ... I dunno ... LYING about the Ukranians sinking the ship?
There would be several avenues of investigation to get at the bottom of the truth.
But they just don't seem interested for some reason ...
Ukrainian narrative = Russian ship sank due to Ukrainian missile(s); crew lost at sea
Russian narrative = Russian ship had an accident on board and caught fire; the ship was evacuated and towed to port; while being towed to port, a storm sank the ship
Which story is closer to the truth? I have no idea.
This seems to be the reason for the claim that the sailors were lost at sea:
At a farewell ceremony for the sunken ship, however, journalists noticed that a memorial ribbon displayed during the event was inscribed, “To the ship and its sailors.”
Seems like a flimsy thing to make such a claim.
In the next sentence, it says:
The next day, Russia’s Defense Ministry published footage of a meeting between the Moskva’s crew and Navy commander-in-chief Admiral Nikolai Yevmenov. Reporters at The Insider determined that roughly 100 sailors appear in the video.
Seems like they are alive, after all, unless this is propaganda of some sort.
Then again, there are some other sources of info in that article from people who claim to have relatives who are still missing. But just a handful. That seems more like an explosion on board, rather than a missile attack that put the ship at the bottom of the Black Sea.
Would be nice if some reporter did some ... jouralism ... and find out if there was actually a storm in the region at that time.
This is just the first article that came up in my search, and I don't take it as gospel, but it's a place to start.
If I am in a military operation, and the other side sinks my ship with a missile ... then my response is to blast the FUCK out of wherever that missile came from.
I don't see any stories about that.
Does Russia still have ships in the region? Do they seem AT ALL concerned about another "missile strike?" If no, then that answers who is telling the truth.
Anyway ... nothing about it being a British ship in that article.
Since the claim was made, but nobody can cite any source for it, I assume it is probably not true.
I don't trust Putin, but I do trust that Putin has enemies that are the same people who are also enemies of the free world.
Have you read the speech he gave just prior to this miltary operation?
I know for sure you didn't see anything about it in the fake news media.
But it is worth a read.
When he talks about what has happened since 2014, it sounds exactly like what the globalist criminal mafia want to force onto the entire world, with Ukraine being the test case.
I watched the speech (with subtitles) and, later, read the speech.
In asymmetric warfare, in which disinformation is necessary, trust no one. Everyone and everything they say must be scrutinized and measured against their actions.
Agreed. However, that does not mean we throw up our hands and walk away because we can't know 100% for sure about the whole thing.
We can still evaluate certain specific claims. Either there was a coup in Ukraine in 2014 to overthrow the duly-elected government, or not. Turns out, there was. Plenty of resources to verify that out there.
Either that coup was funded by the US/CIA or not. If not, then funded by whom? Certainly, someone joined at the hip with US/CIA.
Either Putin's history lesson in his speech is more or less accurate, or not. Could be that he was making a lot of interpretations favorable to his case there, but the claims that US/NATO have been progressively encroaching towards Russia, while constantly lying and saying otherwise, is obviously true.
The weight of evidence tends to favor Putin's claims, and not the US's/CIA's/Fake News Media's claims. That doesn't mean he is 100% in the right, but it does mean that the US/CIA/Fake News Media is not.
It may just mean that we are watching a bad guy war against other bad guys.
Possible. My only concern in that scenario is that both bad guys are engaging in a fake war to target the free people of the world.
But I just don't believe that Putin would give a speech like he did if it was all fake. After all, the Fake News Media prostitutes will sell themselves to anyone they think is in power. They will promote any bullshit story.
So, who needs details and reasons for a military invasion? Just let the Fake News prostitutes get on their knees and do what they are paid to do.
Everything about this story makes me think that Putin is more on the good guy side than the bad guy side -- at least as it relates to his interests in Ukraine and fighting the NWO criminal mafia -- but it's just a hunch.
Well, yes, although you have a very good headstart with understanding Ukraine if you have been reading the alt-media about it since 2014 and following the events in Donbass.
Normies did not care about that conflict because is didn't hit the MSM.
Which brings up an interesting question: Why would some Ukranians want to be joined with Russia, considering the evil that the Soviets did to Ukranians in the 1930's?
Obvious answer is that only some Ukrainians want that. Namely the ones who have ethinic ties to Russia and not Ukraine. Now that the valid Ukraine government was overthrown 8 years ago, and the current Ukraine government is attacking these people, it stands to reason they want OUT. Just like the people of Crimea did in the weeks following the illegal coup in 2014.
Which is basically what Putin said.
Now that I think about it, Putin's version of what is going on lines up with evidence and critical thinking a hell of a lot more than the other side (which makes no sense at all).
Eastern Ukranians (Russians) do want to be part of Russia. The Ukranian government, with help of the Azov Battalion, has been cleansing the Ukraine of Russian-speaking people for years.
bullshit
Utter and total.
Always consider the source.
Here is a list of articles by that author.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=&authornamef=David+Averre+For+Mailonline
Titles of articles:
Very one-sided. Plus, he has a weird way of capitalizing words in titles, which is not the "official" way of doing things (I do it all the time, but I don't get paid to promote propaganda like he does).
Author is right about Le Pen and the polls.
Are we supposed to have a vested interest in Putin winning big and not selling disinformation himself?
That's not the point. The point is that it is one of many biased titles, and none that were biased in the other direction. Ergo, anything he writes is suspect, because he is clearly not an objective reporter/writer.
Nope. But again, not the point.
The point is the bias, not the specific claims. Not only is the writer biased, but he appeals to emotion, which is another indication of manipulation rather than objective journalism.
What are the real numbers?
Russia put out some disinformation numbers themselves a couple of weeks ago.
What is really happening there?
How would I know?
How would you?
Exactly
Agreed, but again that does not mean we can't do some critical thinking to try and figure out which cliam(s) is closer to the truth.
Agree, again. (I like you.)
Keep encouraging critical thinking.
First thing that jumped out at me in the article is "333 aircraft" lost. Looks like D33pst@te comms again. And propaganda no doubt
😂😂😂
The Daily Mail
😂😂😂
Fecking useless paper... https://files.catbox.moe/26l3dy.jpg
What is your accurate source for Ukranian war news? What are the actual numbers?
Hah! From the 'DailyMendacity' themselves, who use Ukro-Nazi statisitcs.
No, my friend the Russians are winning it. It just takes longer without killing civilians. And this is what the Russians are doing.
That "pride of its navy" was a 40 year old ship. That spells out a ship at the very end of its longevity. Whether this was a false flag act or not (I have my suspicions), it has become Russia's own 'Pearl Harbor' and has completely galvanized the Russian people behind the Russian Police action in Ukraine.
I'm Rootin' for Putin.
...Because you can never go wrong with an ex-KGB billionaire.
Putin is fighting the NWO and the world economic forum. Also Putin NEVER forced me to take a kill shot that is going to kill me.
Putin is fighting NATO, who, in part, happens to be the NWO.
Yet in spite of the details the Ukrainians are losing so badly it is not even close...seems Force Adcdefyadayada is doing just fine with out the hardware. 😀
I know for a fact that ship was towed back to port. If any of it is a lie, its all a lie.
Russia says the ship was being towed back to port, and during that move a storm sank the ship.
So, both towing and sinking could be true.
What is really REVEALING, though, is that it seems that no "journalist" as gone to the minimal trouble of finding out if there WAS a storm in that region at that time.
If not, they could shout and scream that Russia is lying.
But they don't seem interested in that.
They also don't seem interested in finding out if Russia retaliated against the "missile strike" by blasting the Ukranian source of the missile.
They also don't seem interested in finding out if Russia STILL has ships in the area, which would mean they are not concerned about any missile strikes sinking other ships.
Gee ... I wonder why ...
Could it be ...
Nah, unthinkable!
I mean ... could it be ...
That the Deep State Propaganda Media is ... I dunno ... LYING about the Ukranians sinking the ship?
There would be several avenues of investigation to get at the bottom of the truth.
But they just don't seem interested for some reason ...
Lies and disinformation all part of asymmetric warfare.
...but even TASS reported that the Moskva sank:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/tass.com/defense/1441959/amp
Yeah, no. Russia is running a purely humanitarian mission. The ship at the bottom of the Black Sea was British.
Any sauce on that?
I didn't see anything with a quick search.
Search, Russia towed the ship back to port. There is your answer.
I just pulled up an article. Looks to me like:
Ukrainian narrative = Russian ship sank due to Ukrainian missile(s); crew lost at sea
Russian narrative = Russian ship had an accident on board and caught fire; the ship was evacuated and towed to port; while being towed to port, a storm sank the ship
Which story is closer to the truth? I have no idea.
This seems to be the reason for the claim that the sailors were lost at sea:
Seems like a flimsy thing to make such a claim.
In the next sentence, it says:
Seems like they are alive, after all, unless this is propaganda of some sort.
Then again, there are some other sources of info in that article from people who claim to have relatives who are still missing. But just a handful. That seems more like an explosion on board, rather than a missile attack that put the ship at the bottom of the Black Sea.
Would be nice if some reporter did some ... jouralism ... and find out if there was actually a storm in the region at that time.
This is just the first article that came up in my search, and I don't take it as gospel, but it's a place to start.
https://meduza.io/en/feature/2022/04/18/at-least-thirty-seven-dead
I'm thinking ...
If I am in a military operation, and the other side sinks my ship with a missile ... then my response is to blast the FUCK out of wherever that missile came from.
I don't see any stories about that.
Does Russia still have ships in the region? Do they seem AT ALL concerned about another "missile strike?" If no, then that answers who is telling the truth.
Anyway ... nothing about it being a British ship in that article.
Since the claim was made, but nobody can cite any source for it, I assume it is probably not true.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/tass.com/defense/1441959/amp
Russian news says that it sank while being towed.
Me either.
Sure...Putin has a storied history of being a KGB humanitarian.
Like him more than you.
But please, lecture us more. It's quite convincing lol.
Yes...Putin is definitely more likable than me, for sure. 🐸
I don't trust Putin, but I do trust that Putin has enemies that are the same people who are also enemies of the free world.
Have you read the speech he gave just prior to this miltary operation?
I know for sure you didn't see anything about it in the fake news media.
But it is worth a read.
When he talks about what has happened since 2014, it sounds exactly like what the globalist criminal mafia want to force onto the entire world, with Ukraine being the test case.
https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/president-putins-full-text-of-february-21-2022-speech-to-the-nation/
I watched the speech (with subtitles) and, later, read the speech.
In asymmetric warfare, in which disinformation is necessary, trust no one. Everyone and everything they say must be scrutinized and measured against their actions.
Agreed. However, that does not mean we throw up our hands and walk away because we can't know 100% for sure about the whole thing.
We can still evaluate certain specific claims. Either there was a coup in Ukraine in 2014 to overthrow the duly-elected government, or not. Turns out, there was. Plenty of resources to verify that out there.
Either that coup was funded by the US/CIA or not. If not, then funded by whom? Certainly, someone joined at the hip with US/CIA.
Either Putin's history lesson in his speech is more or less accurate, or not. Could be that he was making a lot of interpretations favorable to his case there, but the claims that US/NATO have been progressively encroaching towards Russia, while constantly lying and saying otherwise, is obviously true.
The weight of evidence tends to favor Putin's claims, and not the US's/CIA's/Fake News Media's claims. That doesn't mean he is 100% in the right, but it does mean that the US/CIA/Fake News Media is not.
Discernment, Pede.
Agree that there was a 2014 coup.
That doesn't mean that Putin is a good guy.
It may just mean that we are watching a bad guy war against other bad guys.
Possible. My only concern in that scenario is that both bad guys are engaging in a fake war to target the free people of the world.
But I just don't believe that Putin would give a speech like he did if it was all fake. After all, the Fake News Media prostitutes will sell themselves to anyone they think is in power. They will promote any bullshit story.
So, who needs details and reasons for a military invasion? Just let the Fake News prostitutes get on their knees and do what they are paid to do.
Everything about this story makes me think that Putin is more on the good guy side than the bad guy side -- at least as it relates to his interests in Ukraine and fighting the NWO criminal mafia -- but it's just a hunch.
People must really have their head in the sand to believe any of this.
Don't people really have their head in the sand believing any news that comes out of Ukraine?
Well, yes, although you have a very good headstart with understanding Ukraine if you have been reading the alt-media about it since 2014 and following the events in Donbass.
Normies did not care about that conflict because is didn't hit the MSM.
The pertinent Ukranian history goes back further than 2014. World War II, anyone?
Yes, of course.
Pre-WWII with the Holodomor.
Which brings up an interesting question: Why would some Ukranians want to be joined with Russia, considering the evil that the Soviets did to Ukranians in the 1930's?
Obvious answer is that only some Ukrainians want that. Namely the ones who have ethinic ties to Russia and not Ukraine. Now that the valid Ukraine government was overthrown 8 years ago, and the current Ukraine government is attacking these people, it stands to reason they want OUT. Just like the people of Crimea did in the weeks following the illegal coup in 2014.
Which is basically what Putin said.
Now that I think about it, Putin's version of what is going on lines up with evidence and critical thinking a hell of a lot more than the other side (which makes no sense at all).
Eastern Ukranians (Russians) do want to be part of Russia. The Ukranian government, with help of the Azov Battalion, has been cleansing the Ukraine of Russian-speaking people for years.
Right. Those are the people who want out, just like the people in Crimea did.
It's why they declared indpendence from Ukraine (Declaration of Independence, anyone?).
Russia then officially recognized them as independent countries, and stepped in to assist them.
He might be doing other things, as well (biolabs, etc.), or maybe not.
Time will tell -- but will we get the truth of what really happened?
Agree...only time will tell.
Will we get to the truth of what really happened?
I don't know, but I hope so.
Nah. But he wishes.
A compleet load of shit. LOL.
What are the actual numbers?
Why has it been removed? Is it not worthy of discussion?